Scholar's Aid Lite for Windows

Used Scholar's Aid Lite for Windows?

This Lite version cannot auto-update through the Internet and lacks certain features found in the paid version.

Developer’s Description

By Scholar's Aid

Free yourself from the grunt work involved in writing a paper.

If you are writing a term paper, research paper, or dissertation, you have probably already experienced the hassle of finding quotes and writing footnotes. This program will manage your bibliography, convert any bibliographical entry into a footnote, and insert footnotes into your document automatically. Furthermore, it can help you manage your index cards or notes, search for text in your notes, transfer items to your document, and create references (for example, footnotes, short footnotes, or parenthetical references) automatically for each note in your document. The last release included a DataGuard function that protects your work, and new context-sensitive help. This program supports several major word processors, including Word 6/7/97/2000/2002, WordPerfect 6/7/8/9/10, and WordPro 97.

Scholar's Aid Lite for Windows

Used Scholar's Aid Lite for Windows?

Explore More

Full Specifications

GENERAL

Release: June 18, 2001

Latest update: February 29, 2024

Version: 4

OPERATING SYSTEMS

Platform: Windows

Operating System

Windows ME
Windows 98
Windows 10
Windows 95

Additional Requirements: None

POPULARITY

Total Downloads: 96,770

Downloads Last Week: 1

Report Software

Program available in other languages

Descargar Scholar's Aid Lite

Last Updated

User Reviews

3.4/5

35 User Votes

my data disappeared
taipeiguyDecember 27, 2009
Pros
has powerful interface for getting information from online libraries
Cons
The program simply lost a lot of data that I entered. It just disappeared without a trace and I couldn't retrieved. I'm scared to use it again. Also, when I sent an email to the company asking for support, they never replied.
Summary
Non-existent tech support
revalancDecember 21, 2009
Pros
The concept is great and just what I was looking for. Keep references and notes together in one system.
Cons
Remote data searches problematic in vista and Win7. Non-existent customer support and tech support.
Summary
I had a problem with the remote records searches and contacted tech support no less than 10 times all through 2009 with absolutely NO response. I gave up and decided to use Zotero a free plugin to Firefox that is much better supported and poised for continual updates, oh and did I mention is was free?
I loved it!!
Leif HenningAugust 14, 2009
Pros
It was comprehensive and well, with its own library that you can create your own "library" in, add notes, and author, visual program gave what it promised.
Cons
It is a "as it is program" . Use at your own risk
Summary
Have to reacquire registerat. key after every reinstall
NiluferMarch 7, 2009
Pros
It is a pretty good program for any researcher with rather manageable instability (if one is very cautions). Uses hierarchical and flexible organization and fine referencing system.
Cons
Even after you purchase the program, you have to reacquire the key online after every reinstall. When it is your work accumulated over the years this is very disturbing. Also, technical support doesn't respond to your technical questions.
Summary
Do NOT buy or rely on this program for long-term commitment. The program misses the main idea "a researcher uses this program to organize his/her notes for a lifetime (ideally)." Even after you officially purchase and own the program, the company is so stingy that you have to re access to them online and reacquire the key so that you can use your own personal item, i.e.: the program. When it is your research notes accumulated over the years this is a very disturbing issue. Also, their technical support is very weak. They refuse to respond to your technical questions. I am desperately looking for another equivalent program. Have already trashed my Master's Thesis notes!!!!
Excellent interface
Ainsley40February 29, 2008
Pros
Cons
Summary
User-friendly and effective
kjvosDecember 25, 2006
Pros
Comprehensive options in the librabry. Has everything you need to soften the burden of writing a thesis. <p>You can use the keyword-feature to select your own sources.
Cons
There are a lot of sources I don't use that are in the database, but when you delete these records, it works like a charm.
Summary
amazing program!!!
icosmoJanuary 27, 2006
Pros
It's have note manager. You can attach records in the notes module to the source in the library module. So scholar's aid is a kind of combination of Endnote and <p>Notelens.
Cons
Summary
December 5, 2004
Pros
Cons
Summary
This program is extremly useful in organizing notes for a research report.
A good, helpful program
emshoreDecember 2, 2004
Pros
Cons
Summary
I have been running an earlier share-ware version of this program for about four years on Windows XP with Word XP. I have been working on my doctoral dissertation, and the program has been invaluable to me, saving me much time in tedious footnoting. The program works well, and the interface IS user-friendly and intuitive. I have recommended it to other students. It's hard for me to understand all this negative feedback. I have found a few gliches, most of them small, but the worse being that once all my data completely disappeared! However, the program has a backup-restore function, which I have used since then to make sure it wouldn't happen again. (It did, and I was prepared.) Besides that, the program is a little complicated when it comes to making user-changes in reference note formatting. However, I compared this to EndNote and found it to be much better -- simpler in design and easier to use. Whereas Endnote has many more features, for the average student, on a shoestring budget, I highly recommend Scholar's Aid. I plan on purchasing the full program as soon as I can.
Cumbersome and badly integrated
February 12, 2004
Pros
Cons
Summary
The user interface is one of the worst I have ever seen. For a program created to perform a simple task, the program is unnecessarily complex. I thought that a program supposedly endorsed by Oxford University would have had a more robust content management system for all the "features" touted. Instead we get an awkward program that often fails to live up to the promise of electronic bibliographic tools: efficiency and time saving.