- Quick specs
- Price: Free to try (Some features disabled); $99.00 to buy
- Operating system: Windows Vista, Windows 95, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows 98
- Date added: December 11, 2006
- Total Downloads: 18,562
- Downloads last week: 24
- See full specifications
A newer version of Vextractor is available.
(Download doesn't provide access to previous versions of this program.)
- Average user rating: stars out of 2 votes
See all user reviews
Publisher's description
From VextraSoft :Vextractor is a vectorizer software for transforming raster images into vector formats by building centerlines and outlines. This tool could be used for vectorizing of charts, drawings, maps, and schemes for input to CAD or GIS systems. Also you can vectorize logotypes and other similar line art images for using in Vector Graphic Design software.
Main features of Vextractor: Create centerlines and outlines; recognize arcs and circles; recognize ortholines; built-in vector editor; polylines smoothing; smart trace method for passing polylines crossings; input raster formats: BMP, GIF, TIFF, GeoTIFF, JPEG, PCX, TGA, PNG, RAS, WBMP, ICO; noise filtration; TWAIN32-compatible scanner support; output format for vector information: DXF, DXB, WMF, EMF, EPS, SVG, ArcView Shapefiles, MapInfo MID/MIF, ASCII XYZ.
Version 3.5 significantly redesigned and improved user interface.
More popular Image Editing Software downloads
- 170,264 downloads 1. IrfanView
- 141,686 downloads 2. PhotoScape
- 39,298 downloads 3. Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended
- 26,261 downloads 4. FastStone Image Viewer
- 18,104 downloads 5. Paint.NET
- See all Image Editing Software downloads
User reviews of Vextractor 3.5
- Average user rating: 0 stars Not yet available
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 1 of 1 user reviewSee 1 user review
This software version | All versions -
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful
Version: Vextractor 3.5
Pros: Lots of great options, it would be great if it worked.
Cons: When I tried to vectorize an image it would work correctly.
- See 1 user review Write review
Submit your review
Previous Versions:
