- Quick specs
- Price: Free
- Operating system: Windows Vista, Windows Me, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows NT, Windows 98
- Date added: March 11, 2008
- Total Downloads: 8,077
- Downloads last week: 31
- See full specifications
A newer version of Lively Browser is available.
(Download doesn't provide access to previous versions of this program.)
- Average user rating: stars out of 10 votes
See all user reviews
Publisher's description
From Livelybrowser :Lively Browser supports traditionally Tabbed mode and our originally Tree mode to surf in Internet as a Web browser. Moreover, We provide the most popular websites(Ranked by popularity, by countries and by languages), forums(Ranked by popularity, by total posts and by total members), and software(Ranked by popularity, by top editor rated and by top user rated), especially Alexa top sites list. In addition, they are auto-updated weekly.
Version 3.4 adds a search function in toolbar, including Google, Yahoo, MSN and Alexa by default; adds a "URL Filter" function in "Resource" view.
What's new in this version:
Version 3.4 adds a search function in toolbar, including Google, Yahoo, MSN and Alexa by default; adds a "URL Filter" function in "Resource" view.More popular Web Browsers downloads
- 76,876 downloads 1. Mozilla Firefox
- 49,964 downloads 2. Internet Explorer
- 46,067 downloads 3. Avant Browser
- 19,632 downloads 4. Google Chrome
- 13,648 downloads 5. Opera
- See all Web Browsers downloads
User reviews of Lively Browser 3.4
- Average user rating: 0 stars Not yet available
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 1 of 1 user reviewSee 1 user review
This software version | All versions -
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
Version: Lively Browser 3.4
Pros: So very different from any other browser and the choice of many thousand sites
make this one quite exciting That, and the recent price reductions make it a must have program. The software provider is also unusually receptive to comment
Cons: The search facility is likely to be updated shortly as it is rather difficult to use naturally and needs to have "and" and "not" to cut down on sites found in "Search"
- See 1 user review Write review
Submit your review
Previous Versions:


