- Quick specs
- Price: Free to try (Nag screen); $99.00 to buy
- Operating system: Windows 95, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows 98
- Date added: October 18, 2005
- Total Downloads: 2,948
- Downloads last week: 6
- See full specifications
A newer version of J2K-Codec is available.
(Download doesn't provide access to previous versions of this program.)
- Average user rating: stars out of 1 votes
See all user reviews
Publisher's description
From J2K-Codec :Make your graphics look better with an easy-to-use JPEG 2000 decoding component. J2K-Codec can help game developers, screensaver creators and many others to improve their products to achieve smaller size of images with still the same quality. The new image compression standard based on wavelet technology has many interesting features not available in the old JPEG, such as alpha-channel and resolution levels.
What's new in this version:
- Major feature: ActiveX scaling bug fixed.
More popular Components & Libraries downloads
- 889 downloads 1. SimpleOCR
- 813 downloads 2. Microsoft ActiveX Control Pad
- 671 downloads 3. Visual Basic 5.0 Runtime Module
- 653 downloads 4. Unique RAR File Library
- 426 downloads 5. Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86)
- See all Components & Libraries downloads
User reviews of J2K-Codec 1.51
- Average user rating: 0 stars Not yet available
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 1 of 1 user reviewSee 1 user review
This software version | All versions -
Version: J2K-Codec 1.51
"Leaks memory when using c# - can be seen in demo, poor support"
Cons: The memory leak can be seen when simply using the sample project provided in download: "b_Decode". You load the jp2 images into a viewer, as you continue to load, the memory usage continues to climb. The developer has said that linking statically "may" fix this issue. This requires extra work on my part - only to hope that this "may" fix the issue.
Poor support: When I asked for a sample visual studio project using static linking that I can follow as template, I did not receive an email back as to whether this was possible or not.
Save your time and money.
- See 1 user review Write review
Submit your review
Previous Versions:
