NeoDownloader for Windows

User Reviews

• A bit better than free Webripper

  KuhscheissSeptember 7, 2014

  Pros

  Shows a panel of downloaded thumbs, shows selected enlarged, can keep folder ID

  Cons

  If shut down in the middle of a download, it deletes the file, even a 500 Mb video. It refuses to keep operator minimum size selection. It drops down to thumb size, viz 25 kb for next download. Won't download on many sites at all, even though clicking link gets the pic. Won't download yahoo although Bulk Image Downloader has no problem. Stores as many as 7 layers of folders for 1 pic. Help non-existent. Queries about min file size settings unanswered. the various selections of 1 page, 1 gallery, whole site etc seem completely undependable. 1 page downloads one page when it works at all. Whole website sems to work - a lot of pix. Layers and outside links don't seem to work. Like free Webripper, there's a lot of action with no results.It can go on for minutes with no downloads. It also can delay the download of the selected images for hundreds of files. Altogether, overpriced for it's performance. For pix, Bulk Image Downloader is far better and offers control of what's stored

  Summary

  If Neodownloader Lite does all you need and more, MAYBE the pro version will do it for you. I would just as soon use free Webripper which REQUIRES you to set pic and image size for every download, so you can't blame it for getting mostly thumbnails<br /><br /><span class='notifyMsg'> Updated </span>on Sep 7, 2014<p/>The user who said it worked on every site either has only a couple of sites he uses or he's on something pretty powerful<br /><br /><span class='notifyMsg'> Updated </span>on Oct 26, 2014<p/>Dumping a few pix into each folder is OK for a total of 15 pix. If you're downloading a few hundred, rummaging through a hundred folders gets tiresome. No help from Help. No reply from website. Having YOUR settings reset to the original every time is annoying and time-wasting. Leaving artifacts for evry deletion is also puzzling. If I delete a pic, why do I need a reminder of what it was? This seems more like a beta version than a finished product.<br /><br /><span class='notifyMsg'> Updated </span>on Jul 31, 2017<p/>I just did a tumblr download with a 3 year old version of Neodownloader. I ended up with 14,000 files which, with duplicates removed came in at 2200. I had 14 duplicates of one file. Thank God for "fast duplicate file finder". It took so much time, I would have been better off with free webripper

  ---

• Best image downloader there is hands down!

  ctembyJune 27, 2013

  Pros

  -Works on every site I've tried, unlike all other programs I have tried -Really fast -Intuitive

  Cons

  None that I can think of

  Summary

  I have tried a number of image download programs, and this one is the best hands down! It just works!!! Initially when purchased, I provided feedback, which was taken onboard. Now, I cannot even think what improvements could be made when they release v3, as it's flawless now.

  ---

• Great Program / Poor Support

  LeptoidOctober 3, 2012

  Pros

  Program works amazing and fast.

  Cons

  My registration code got deleted when my email was hacked. Customer support has a specific section for lost registration codes but when I contact them, I get no response. I paid for 2 pieces of their software totally about $39.00 and have ZERO support.

  Summary

  Good program, crappy support.

  ---

• Best bulk image downloader

  Robert-RodriguezMarch 30, 2012

  Pros

  I've tried a lot of image downloaders and NeoDownloader is the best among competitors.

  Cons

  None so far.

  Summary

  Highly recommended.

  ---

• Wonderful Product

  Kensey159753March 26, 2012

  Pros

  Very easy to use Fast downloads Able to grab from multiple galleries Can create multiple projects to save time

  Cons

  None so far

  Summary

  Wonderful product Does as it says it does.

  ---

• This Is The Best

  fuzzyheadinfoJanuary 25, 2012

  Pros

  Best image capture and download software ever!

  Cons

  it works so good it can take a while to get thru all the images

  Summary

  I use this extensively in my web design work

  ---

• BY FAR THE BEST PROGRAM OF IT'S TYPE - EVER!!!!!

  fordmansk64January 8, 2012

  Pros

  EASE OF USE - THE EASIEST OF THE DOZENS I'VE TRIED! RIPS JPGS THAT OTHERS JUST PASS BY!

  Cons

  DOESN'T SERVE ME COFFEE IN THE MORNING! :-) NO CONS, IN MY MIND

  Summary

  ---

• Good job, good program

  drpopsDecember 20, 2011

  Pros

  Fast, compact, stable. Can process almost all sites. I don't need search sites in the Internet. Now I can search in repository only.

  Cons

  I can't see any problems

  Summary

  very GOOD

  ---

• 3 Years Using A Great Program!!

  columbiariverleeDecember 16, 2011

  Pros

  Most User friendly, intuitive website downloading program I've ever used in 25 years of websurfing! Program is extremely efficient and trouble free at whatever task I apply it to. (I download approximately 30-40 THOUSAND images a day, with never a problem worth mentioning.

  Cons

  Since installing the latest (last 2) versions, my control bar does not appear in the full-screen mode of the image viewer (P;ay, Pause,Stop, Next, &#38; Previous buttons). I don't know if the omission is due to the latest versions of the viewer no longer having the controls in full screen mode, or if Windows 7 is not allowing them... main page (small) viewer does have them. Rarely, when deleing finished projects from the list in the main screen, a Windows error screen pops up saying the program has created an access violation at such &#38; such a hexidecinal address, and this is remedied by restarting the Neo progtam. No big thing.

  Summary

  Buy it!! You'll like it!!!

  ---

• Great software

  coop251November 19, 2011

  Pros

  It is fast and complete

  Cons

  Locks up sometimes, it could be due to the web site and not the software.

  Summary

  Great software. It gets the job done!

  ---

• Show reviewsHide reviews
• Rate it