Publisher's Description
From Wikiwiki Software:
Click'n View is a powerful image viewer.
- Importing images from your digital camera with one click.
- Slide show with sound and effect.
- Easy Printing, crop, rotate Pictures.
- Includes Batch file converter (JPEG/PICT/BMP/TIFF/GIF/PDF/PNG/PDS->JPEG/PICT/TIFF)
- Manages countless pictures in one picture list with less memory.
- Any page of PDF can be cropped, viewed, printed.
- Create your homepage, and keep your homepage up-to-date with user's template.
- Any operation does not change original file.
- Strings and clips can be added to the picture.
- Help File is included in the package.
- Tutorial for novice users included.
- Various movie file formats supported: MOV, MPEG4, AVI, 3GPP, 3GPP2, AMC.
- Mac OS 9.2 supported by PPC version.
What's new in this version:
- Completly free, not evaluation period, no restriction.
- Some bugs fixed, menus are changed as a freeware.
More Popular Photo Editors downloads
- Adobe Photoshop CS5
5,827 downloads
- GIMP
1,187 downloads
- Adobe Photoshop CS6 Beta
726 downloads
- GraphicConverter
645 downloads
- Snapheal
630 downloads
-
All versions:
1.0 starsout of 1 votes
-
Current version:
1.0 starsout of 1 votes
-
My rating:
Write review
Results 1-1 of 1
-
"Confusing and resized photos are of poor quality."
Version: Click'n View 1.3
Pros
At first, it seemed to be well-organized when it ran the tutorial.
Cons
The tutorial was obviously written by someone who doesn't know English well. The tutorial was confusing and difficult to understand. I finally killed it and tried to figure it out on my own. There was no mouse-over text for the odd buttons and the drop boxes had selections in them that didn't match what I thought they meant.
When I resized a photo, I momentarily lost it. When I went looking through "preferences," there was no way to tell where it saves the new images. After a search, I discovered it had created a new folder on my desktop labeled with the date! Then the photo was of the poorest quality I've seen in a long time in digital images.
Inefficient, poor quality image results. I trashed it right away.
Add Your Review
Submit your reply
E-mail this review
Report offensive content
See more CNET content tagged:
Previous Versions:
