Used LilyPond for Mac? Share your experience and help other users.
Developer’s Description
Used LilyPond for Mac? Share your experience and help other users.
Full Specifications
- GENERAL
- Release
- Latest update
- Version
- 2.21.6
- OPERATING SYSTEMS
- Platform
- Mac
- Operating System
- Mac OS X
- Additional Requirements
- macOS Catalina
- macOS Mojave
- macOS High Sierra
- macOS Sierra
- OS X El Capitan
- OS X Yosemite
- OS X Mavericks
- POPULARITY
- Total Downloads
- 1,274
- Downloads Last Week
- 1
Report Software
Program available in other languages
Last Updated
User Reviews
3/5
2 User Votes
All the people that complain about LilyPond ...
Ulrich Kapp- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />... probably never had to engrave complex music in a professional way. I concede that LilyPond isn't easy to use for the 'first time user', but after a reasonable time of using it, you will be faster than with any other application with a graphical user interface. And the sheet music produced with LilyPond looks really professional and there is very less you can't do with LilyPond. I also tried an X-Windows based graphical interface to LilyPond (which produces the LilyPond source code) but I returned to pure LilyPond immediately. For me, LilyPond is the best music engraving software. p.s.: I've seen one comment who recommended Finale Notepad instead of LilyPond *LOL* Did you really ever tried to edit a music sheet with many staves and lots of lyrics stanzas?
Lilypond is fabulous
pianis- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />Lilypond was started because programs such as Finale, Sibelius, or Overture by default produce a score layout that is well below publication quality. While the majority of musicians might be surprised to hear this, genuinely professional engravers know of the problems and they modify the score to meet their high standards. The occasional element clashes produced by Lilypond are very minor compared to the engraving problems produced by Finale or Sibelius. I came across a score by Meridian Publishing, Inc. that quite clearly used the default output. Fine for casual use, unacceptable for publication. Contrary to what zimbop says almost every aspect of Lilypond's output can be modified. Granted, figuring out how is not always very straightforward. But doing things such as adjusting spacing and moving elements to avoid clashes is usually fairly simple. The high-quality output of Lilypond is due to the fact that they haven't spent any time developing a GUI, but rather focused on researching excellent engraving practices and developing Lilypond to reproduce them automatically. As a composer who takes pride in my scores, I have switched to Lilypond and do not intend to go back. Lilypond is probably not for the person who likes to print up scores on the computer with a minimum of fuss. But Lilypond is for the composer or musician who is willing to spend a little more time in order to produce a beautiful score. And it really only takes a little more time once you become accustom to Lilypond's input. But it does have a reasonable learning curve.