Used QupZilla for Windows? Share your experience and help other users.
Developer’s Description
By David Rosca
Used QupZilla for Windows? Share your experience and help other users.
Full Specifications
- GENERAL
- Release
- Latest update
- Version
- 1.4.3
- OPERATING SYSTEMS
- Platform
- Windows
- Operating System
- Windows ME
- Windows XP
- Windows 2000
- Windows NT
- Windows 10
- Windows Vista
- Windows 2003
- Windows 98
- Windows 7
- Additional Requirements
- None
- POPULARITY
- Total Downloads
- 3,724
- Downloads Last Week
- 2
Report Software
Program available in other languages
Last Updated
User Reviews
3.2/5
5 User Votes
Disappointing (crashes)
MAFinOKC- Pros
- Clean interface, seems to run okay (with major exception, see below)
- Cons
- I installed Qupzilla for one reason only: I do work on a website that makes heavy use of Flash and on which the Flash plugin crashes with depressing regularity, including when running under Chrome which the website developer recommends. I was hoping that Qupzilla would provide a more reliable experience. Unfortunately, instead of just the Flash element crashing, the whole Qupzilla browser crashes with depressing regularity on that selfsame website.
- Summary
- Installed this browser for a limited specific purpose in the hope that it would work better than the "mainstream" browsers on a particular website, but it didn't. I've uninstalled it.
At last I found a browser to play live streaming video.
Gablle- Pros
- Reasonable small download with a quick and smooth installtion. The fastest browser I have ever tried. It's faster than Safari, Opera or Chrome and is even faster than Palemoon 64bit which is my default browser. It is stable with a nice user interface and with speed dial and bookmarks sidebar.. I have been looking for a long time for a fast browser for live online video streaming and this does the job perfectly well.
- Cons
- I could not import my bookmarks from another browser or html files. It kept hanging at 90%+. The way around it was to import the bookmarks in safe mode (windows) and it worked quickly and without a hitch, Also, it does not have the addons bells and whistles of Firefox or even Opera which makes it limited to what comes with it. Finally, this browser has a small user base with a small development team which limits its development potensial so it will either become popular or just disappear quitely like many before it which I believe would be a pity.
- Summary
- This browser is very fast and works perfectly well. I wouldn't recommend it as the main browser but I definitly recommend it as an backup browser. It's welll worth a try.
Poor for this day ad age, not even up to netscape :(
desertdan1- Pros
- None!None !
- Cons
- Importing bookmarks ? JOKE
- Summary
- Tried it dumped it! NOTE: windows doesn't like it and Comodo Virus Scan wanted to shoot it!Some things cnet needs to reject, because this App had to pay to get on cnet !
Best QT WebKit Browsers!
pamacbear- Pros
- Very fast. Has tab scope and excellent ad blocker features similar to FF. Speed dial with drop & drag feature similar to opera. Light on memory and CPU usage. Only QT WebKit browser being updated.
- Cons
- Has a few web sites with streaming radio that do not work due to a WebKit bug, however most sites do work. If you are an add-on happy this is not your browser.
- Summary
- Excellent fast basic browser ideal for older systems.
Fast & Fun
ElObomo- Pros
- Fast and fun. Seems a mix of FireFox and Chrome. Uses WebKit rendering engine.
- Cons
- Has some problems with flash applications - you may have to white out some fav sites, can't find a way to import bookmarks from IE, tries to disable chat feature in Facebook, no spell check that I can see. Not sure what kind of security features it has.
- Summary
- Should be a very good browser after the developer sorts out a few kinks.<br /><br /><span class='notifyMsg'> Updated </span>on Apr 14, 2012<p/>Leaves a folder behind when un-installed.