ICeCoffEE for Mac

User Reviews

• Yaaaaaaaaay!!!

  artie505March 1, 2008

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />What more need be said? I've been muddling through, but now I can go APE again! So far, so good... No conflicts, no gremlins, my cat is still alive, and my house has not, I repeat... NOT, burned down.

  ---

• Nearly Indispensable Utility

  alajuelaJuly 29, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />I had really been noticing its absence on my MBP. Thanks for releasing it in UB.

  ---

• Amazing!

  XeaterJuly 9, 2005

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />Apple should do this on OS X themselves! I never used the Services menu before because it was such a pain to access, but now I use it quite frequently. This is a good, solid piece of freeware that fills a gaping hole in OS X, where Apple got 85% done with services and then moved on. Of course part of the problem is Apple's moral objection to a standard two button mouse, but thankfully IceCoffee steps in and does Apple's job for them. Thanks for the b!tchin' app!

  ---

• Abso-tively, posi-lutely incredible

  ClassicUserMay 17, 2005

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />With this latest update, once again we have a simple, yet elegant, solution to easily making just about any URL clickable, anywhere. Kudos to Nicholas for updating this must-have utility for Tiger so quickly. This is definitely one of the best additions you can use to enhance the usability of your Mac; I can't imagine using mine without it.

  ---

• IceCoffEE 1.4.2

  bonsai8May 16, 2005

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />I'm glad to have IceCoffEE back in Tiger. So I like to rate it 5 Stars. But the using of APE is a criterial that votes it down to zero. I was glad to have banned APE form Tiger but needed it for URLManger Shared Menus. Now I "must" have these installed because of using these two helpers. Therefore I'm not lucky about that...

  ---

• Very good job,

  ScreenTomMay 16, 2005

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />thank you !

  ---

• APE is not the problem...

  graffixOctober 27, 2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />PEBKAC usually is... Personally, I've had zero problems with the APE framework, and I'm glad that iCeCoffEE uses it... that way the author can concentrate on simply adding features to the plug-in rather than making sure it behaves correctly with every application (which is Unsanity's responsibility). Were it not for Unsanity creating a unified plug-in architecture for OSX, it would be extremely difficult to deploy system-wide 'hacks' like were prevalent in OS9. If you're having problems with APE, e-mail Unsanity with a bug report and hopefully they'll fix it... posting unfounded complaints at versiontracker is dubious at best and won't do anything to solve the problem. I've used iCECoffEE since it was called iCEtEE way back when (in the classic MacOS) and I find it invaluable. 6-stars!

  ---

• cipherswarmMarch 16, 2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />PSmith: that's probably because you have something installed that doesn't cooperate with the OS. I had the same problem, but that's because I had 9

  ---

• Ken LanxnerMarch 15, 2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />A great utitlity! Even without the command-click URL capability, the Services menu options make my life much easier. Apple makes Services hard to use by

  ---

• moribundusMarch 14, 2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />first hooked on ICeTEe, now i need ICeCoffEE. talk about addictive personality...

  ---