Used Euphoria Programming Language for Windows?
Developer’s Description
Used Euphoria Programming Language for Windows?
Full Specifications
- GENERAL
- Release
- Latest update
- Version
- 3.0.1
- OPERATING SYSTEMS
- Platform
- Windows
- Operating System
- Windows ME
- Windows Vista
- Windows 98
- Windows XP
- Windows 10
- Windows 95
- Windows NT
- Windows 2000
- Additional Requirements
- Windows 95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP/Vista
- POPULARITY
- Total Downloads
- 51,013
- Downloads Last Week
- 1
Report Software
Program available in other languages
Last Updated
.png){kind=icon}
User Reviews
4.3/5
26 User Votes
Easy to learn and to use. wonderful language
manwoo21- Pros
- I am an engineer. I do not need complicated GUI program. At this view, I think EUPHORIA is very easy and useful.
- Cons
- Not popular language. So it is diffcult to find out someone who use EUPHORIA. And homepage give much information for coding and enough.
- Summary
- I think it is good language for beginner. And almost (engineer's) problem can be coded.
Good language for everyone
CoolNile- Pros
- It's easy , fun , creative and functional
- Cons
- Lacks of help & support catalogues
- Summary
- lordmachiavelli
- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
Easy to learn, easy to debug and fast ... and now open source
ma-da-lin- Pros
- Depends on what kind of application you are trying to build, Euphoria can be the best or the worst choice. I do not recomend this programming language if your application must have a lot of GUI elements, windows, dialogs or things like this. You will spend more time designing your GUI than programming the algoritms. Here I am talking about Windows GUI. For MSDOS programming there are a lot of libraries available for Euphoria... <p>For any other goal Euphoria is a good choice. There is a good Euphoria database system. There are a lot of libraries and solutions for almost any common problems. I have a complete dinamic website based on Euphoria, running faster than another one based on PHP for example.<p>I can't recommend this product highly enough because it's an interesting concept, easy to understand and use. No matter if you are an experienced C or C++ programmer or a beginer with no programming skils, you will spend only some days to learn Euphoria.<p>Easy to learn, easy to debug and fast. This is how it is.
- Cons
- Dealing with Windows dinamic link libraries is difficult. There are no complete Windows dll "wrappers", there are some good libraries for dealing with that, but you will always encounter a situation where some functions or some constants from Windows API are not defined...
- Summary
Easy to learn, easy to debug and fast...
ma-da-lin- Pros
- Depends on what kind of application you are trying to build, Euphoria can be the best or the worst choice. I do not recomend this programming language if your application must have a lot of GUI elements, windows, dialogs or things like this. You will spend more time designing your GUI than programming the algoritms. <p> <p>For any other goal Euphoria is a good choice. There is a good Euphoria database system. There are a lot of libraries and solutions for almost any common problems. I have a complete dinamic website based on Euphoria, running faster than another one based on PHP for example. <p> <p>I can't recommend this product highly enough because it's an interesting concept, easy to understand and use. No matter if you are an experienced C or C++ programmer or a beginer with no programming skils, you will spend only some days to learn Euphoria. <p> <p>Easy to learn, easy to debug and fast. This is how it is.
- Cons
- Euphoria interpreter should be open source... Only if you spend some money you can get the source code.
- Summary
Easy, clear, powerful, and very fast
JacquesGuy- Pros
- The syntax is clear and regular, making for terse, very readable code. Terser than Pascal, immensely more readable than C (which is downright cryptic). Automatic garbage collection is a godsend and so is the Euphoria type "sequence" which I can best describe as typeless, dimensionless arrays. Writing in Euphoria takes me a fraction of the time it used to take in Borland Pascal -- perhaps one fourth -- and debugging is hardly ever needed.
- Cons
- Summary
A good programming language
Vincent(Xaero)- Pros
- Euphoria is a small, simple, elegent, and fast programming language. Dynamic sequences makes the language powerful. <p>There is a binder, & Euphoria to C translator which makes standalone EXE or DLL files.
- Cons
- Very little in terms of professional development tools are provided in the package, such as IDE's, Windows/Linux editor, and packaging utilities. The standard library is aging, and offers only basic functionability. Windows/Linux support is bare bones, with no integrated OS API of anykind built in to the language, thus making it very challenging to produce a Windows/Linux GUI application. (Thanks to a dedicated team of people, a library called Win32Lib has wrapped a significant amount of the API for the Windows platform).
- Summary
Great
petopeplib- Pros
- It is a good programming language for beginners, but not as easy as BASIC. <p> <p>You do not have to compile.
- Cons
- You have to type 'ex' to run the program, and if you want to distribute it, you have to include the .e files, and the ex program.
- Summary
Best thing out there!
- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This thing rocked since I've ran DOS 5!
How do you use it again?
- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- I found the documentation awful, the program did not run on my computer at all. I use windows xp. It smells like a shareware language, and unfortunately it is not polished at all. Windows functionality is non existant, dont bother with this trash.