ADmitMac

User Reviews

• No fuss, no problem integration

  macinenterprise5/6/2011

  Pros

  End-to-end from file integration to AD and MCX

  Cons

  Not a specialist in UNIX/Linux/Z integration

  Summary

  Many folks will try and say their product is the best. I'd say download all the vendors and decide what works best in your environment. How is their Mac support? Do all their features work? Do they under promise and over deliver?

  ---

• Challenging setup, but runs perfect once this is...

  Gulliver646/22/2007

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  ...done<br />This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />Challenging setup, but runs perfect once this is done.

  ---

• Good for mac survival in pc/lan

  mabeo1/22/2005

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />excellent product but expensive. Connect mac with AD without problems. Improved installation and configuration

  ---

• hmmmm

  Indyk12/23/2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />do we need need ADmitMac when Panther supports AD out of the box ?! MacDevCenter.com has got good instructions on Panther to make AD work anyway.

  ---

• Excellent

  Compufix0110/27/2003

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />This software has a few advantages over the OSX SMB client. 1. It uses the NTFS stream to store resource info in a maner that is compatible with Services for Macintosh (SFM) and ExtremeZ-IP. 2. It supports DFS 3. It has a much better directory browser and printing plugin. There are other things about it that Make it nice, however the coimpatibility with ExtremeZ-IP and SFM make it crucial in any environment that needs to still support OS9 clients.

  ---