Downsize for Mac
- By Stunt Software
- Trial version
- User Rating
Used Downsize for Mac?
Full Specifications
- GENERAL
- Release
- Latest update
- Version
- 2.7.2
- OPERATING SYSTEMS
- Platform
- Mac
- Operating System
- Mac OS X 10.6
- Mac OS X 10.4
- Mac OS X 10.5
- Mac OS X
- Additional Requirements
- Mac OS X 10.4 or later.
- POPULARITY
- Total Downloads
- 1,241
- Downloads Last Week
- 1
Report Software
Program available in other languages
Last Updated
User Reviews
4.3/5
3 User Votes
Some annoying drawbacks
tlaloc44- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />Downsize watermarks images in one of two ways. It either allows you to superimpose a smaller image on a larger one, or even better allows for the superimposition of text through the program interface. This last is done well, the etxt looks extremely professional and can be applied to batches of images at great speed. BUT the text can only be on one line. This means that the amount of image the watermark can carry unobtrusively is quite limited. In my opinion this program would be greatly improved if the text watermarks could be on multiple lines, say, a line with the image title, and another for copyright. If that change was instituted, "Downsize" would be a far better program.
Too expensive!
Foto555- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />For the limited features it offers. Resizing is done well, but watermarking options are too few for this price.
Excellent, But.......
Terry Constanti- Pros
- Cons
- Summary
- This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />This works just great, very convenient way to batch downsize any number of images. One problem; I had a number of files named IMG_0027.JPG to 0069.JPG (in sequence). For some reason, the downsized files changed the file numbers 0027-0039 to (almost) duplicates of later numbers. i.e. there was no longer any called IMG_0027.JPG - 0039, but there was IMG_0040.JPG, followed by IMG_40.JPG, the latter being the downsized file of IMG_0028.JPG and so on in sequence, IMG_0041 followed by IMG_41 which was really 0029 etc. Anyway. renaming them was still faster than individually downsizing them.