World of Warcraft Auctioneer mod 3.9

• Quick specs
• Price: Free
• Operating system: Windows Me, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows 98
• Date added: February 01, 2007
• Total Downloads: 47,348
• Downloads last week: 21
• See full specifications

Add to my list Add to my Watch List

• Average user rating: 3.0 stars out of 7 votes
  See all user reviews

User reviews

• Average user rating: 3.3 stars out of 7 votes
• My rating: 0 stars Write review

• Showing 4 of 4 user reviewsSee all 4 user reviews
  This software version | All versions

• 1 stars

  1 out of 1 people found this review helpful

  Version: World of Warcraft Auctioneer mod 3.9

  "sucks"

  by appledude141 on April 5, 2008

  Pros: sucks

  Cons: sucks

  Was this review helpful? YES | NO

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

  Reply to this review

• 1 stars

  Version: World of Warcraft Auctioneer mod 3.9

  "Horribly buggy and updates abandoned by dev"

  by smtips on July 18, 2008

  Pros: Batch posting when it works

  Cons: Classic version - although "highly recommended" by developers - has a ton of bugs that the devs just refuse to address. Windows won't refresh, slash commands won't stay after logout, Use my current price always comes up LESS than your real current price is, and more. From the developer forum:

  You keep pushing this program on people that won't update to the "current price" (5 silver less when you have the lowest price even though it says it's gonna post the current price), that defaults to descending order not ascending in lists from the top down (how very unnatural, no one wants the highest on the top they want to see the lowest), that won't refresh, that doesn't know how to use "last price sold" even HOURS later and after logouts and logins not to mention several other commands that no longer "keep" after logging out like they did before, that you don't even WANT people to use and that by your own admission you aren't doing anything about...because....why?

  They are directing people to their "advanced" version and even one of the developers says the interface is "pig latin" for Advanced. But if you ask them about any of the bugs in the much easier to use classic, they will tell you they aren't fixing it, to use advanced, but that they are letting people download the classic, AND they are updating the Revision number without even making any changes or bug fixes to it, because "some people have an old database they don't want to lose." In just about every basic function of the classic version doesn't work any more...yet they refuse to pull it and continue to lie to people and "recommend" this and they tell people "it works" and if you don't like it you don't have to use it.

  What the hell kind of ****** up attitude is that for a developer? Go read the forums for yourself...they are a bunch of shortsighted morons who are getting TONS of complaints about this and they just are too stupid to know their users are saying something to them and continue to try to push this advanced with its sucky interface that everyone I know of hates.

  Was this review helpful? YES | NO

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

  Reply to this review

• 4 stars

  1 out of 2 people found this review helpful

  Version: World of Warcraft Auctioneer mod 3.9

  "Quite Good"

  by madeinchina0805 on February 13, 2007

  Pros: Solid program, lots of good features that are good for you to know what the price of an item to put in Aution House is.

  Cons: Takes to long to search through all the items to give you a best price.

  Was this review helpful? YES | NO

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

  Reply to this review

• 4 stars

  0 out of 1 people found this review helpful

  Version: World of Warcraft Auctioneer mod 3.9

  "Helps make gold!"

  by Ghalt on December 28, 2007

  Pros: Learned the ins and outs of this addon from makewowgold.com and it has become a core piece of my gold-making strategy!

  Was this review helpful? YES | NO

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

  Reply to this review

• See all 4 user reviews Write review