Iridient Developer for Mac

User Reviews

• Excellent...

  RogueNovember 22, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />I have a Fuji S3Pro, and 90% of my shots are in RAW. I have tried Adobes option and a few others. RAW Developer is by far the best IMHO. Takes a little bit of time to get use to the interface, and a few items bug me, but the output is excellent.

  ---

• Gorgeous rendering

  arodneyMay 17, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />What this product has first of all is beautiful, clean, "film like' rendering, at least for all the RAW's I've tested from my Canon Rebel XT. I sent this product as well as LightRoom, and Aperture 1.1 some tricky files and the rendering quality of this product is noticeable superior. LightRoom is a beta and so that might not be totally fair. Aperture is getting better but no contest. Now I'm ONLY referring to the quality of the RAW rendering. For workflow, Aperture (when you don't hit it's numerous hurt me bug) is head and shoulders superior. But RAW quality is the most important consideration in my book (if you can render fast and ugly, what's the point?). There are lots of areas for improvement in this product but that should be relatively easy to do since great RAW processing is tough! Anyone that wants a link to my iDisk with comparisons, of these three products, email me (andrew@digitaldog.net) and see for yourself. Each RAW file is 22mb and I have the RAW original for download too. This isn't a "pretty picture" but one that shows a lot of warts in a RAW rendering. Definitely a product to keep your eye on. If I could only get this level of quality with the workflow of Aperture, I'd be one happy camper.

  ---

• Interesting and maybe choppy work flow

  mphotdolJanuary 24, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />I wonder if this RAW Developer is designed for the beholden consumer or the experienced professional. When I tried RAW Developer, my priority was to investigate the actual work flow worthiness, as well as the effectiveness for the results. I found this decently priced program adaquate in it's ability to process RAW files but when I cut to the chase, the work flow is choppy and the results were less than stellar for the effort. This program loads raw files very quickly but was slow, sometimes delayed, to render curves and other adjustments to just PREVIEW large files, where much invested time can be critical for the desired outcome. All processing was much quicker. As you set up your work flow, you jump from dialog box to dialog box, which are large but can be placed independently within your monitor workspace in your own preferred order. If there is any monitor real estate left, you can view your working image file. This program packs a lot of good things. It depends on how much time you want to spend with this program to cue it to your standards. I'd wait for the upgrades to kick in before I invest my valuable time, even if the price is right.

  ---

• Great test results against ACR

  rpphoto555January 4, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />After opening the same Canon raw file and making the best possible adjustments in Adobe Camera Raw and Raw Developer, wow. Adobe Camera Raw looks like mush, with much less detail, and has colors less rich and smooth. Raw Developer looks MUCH better. I might have to buy this one; too bad I missed the discount sale last month...

  ---

• Great test results against ACR

  rpphoto555January 4, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />After opening the same Canon raw file and making the best possible adjustments in Adobe Camera Raw and Raw Developer, wow. Adobe Camera Raw looks like mush, with much less detail, and has colors less rich and smooth. Raw Developer looks MUCH better. I might have to buy this one; too bad I missed the discount sale last month...

  ---

• Looks quite nice

  arodneyJanuary 2, 2006

  Pros

  Cons

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.<br />I need to spend a lot more time comparing the quality of the conversions to other converters but this looks like a very nice, robust RAW converter. Nice UI, well designed product. Most certainly worth downloading and checking out the demo.

  ---

• Show reviewsHide reviews
• Rate it