Adobe Photoshop Lightroom for Mac

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom for Mac

Editors' Rating:
4
Excellent
Average User Rating:
4.2
out of 4 votes
See all user reviews

Quick Specs

Version:
5.0
File Size:
427.32MB
Date Added:
June 10, 2013
Price:
Free to try (30-day trial); $149.00 to buy (Buy it now)
Operating Systems:
Mac OS X 10.7/10.8
Total Downloads:
73,526
Downloads Last Week:
114
Product ranking:
Additional Requirements:
Not available

Editors' review

The bottom line: Critical enhancements in areas like noise reduction, video handling, and printing make Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 a recommended upgrade for most current users.

For the uninitiated, Lightroom is Photoshop's specialized sibling; where Photoshop is an imaging Swiss Army Knife, Lightroom is a steak knife for photographers. Like its most well-known competitor, Apple Aperture, you use it to organize, process, nondestructively retouch, and output volumes of raw files. Now with version 3, Adobe enhances the product in some critical ways that make it a significant upgrade over version 2.x. There's pretty much something for everyone here, including improved performance, killer noise reduction, potentially powerful export tools, and extremely flexible printing options.

Installation and interface
Lightroom is a much faster, lighter installation than Photoshop. You can choose to purchase a license key immediately, which you will receive by e-mail, or try out the program for 30 days. When you receive your key, you can copy and paste the entire string directly from your e-mail into the first dialog box, and the other boxes will automatically populate. There's a 164MB download for Windows or 77MB on a Mac. Like most of the applications coming out of Adobe these days, it uses the Adobe AIR installer.

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3

Unlike the rest of Adobe's imaging applications, which do a terrible job of helping you migrate to a new version, you can actually upgrade Lightroom. The installation won't overwrite the older application, but it provides an automated way to upgrade your catalog, including catalogs created in Photoshop Elements. LR3 doesn't have the face-recognition capabilities in Elements, but it will import all the tags that already exist for recognized faces. Still missing, however, is the ability to import a copy of the old catalog and continue from there. Processed images in your catalog that use algorithms from previous versions--most notably the old noise-reduction--will retain those processing parameters unless you force an upgrade to the newer ones.

In general, the program's interface hasn't changed much. It's still broken into five modules--Library, Develop, Slideshow, Print, Web--with panels that fly in on demand from the sides of the screen. I'm not sure everyone will start with it, but on at least one install I got a relatively blank screen with instructions to click on a button that wasn't visible. LR3 adds a compact, ostensibly less-distracting import view, which uses your previous settings. I'm not sure it's really necessary to have multiple import interfaces, but some people might like it. Adobe has tweaked the main import interface to provide greater clarity as to source, options, and target settings. The application visually separates removable devices from nonremovable ones, which is a nice feature.

Lightroom can now catalog some video formats shot with cameras, and you can manage the files within the application and pass them through on export. It may not be much of an issue for some people, but I continue to be frustrated by Lightroom's handling of unknown file types (because I use so many new, as-yet-unsupported cameras). At the time of this writing, that included Sony's first NEX models and the AVCHD MTS files created by Sony and Panasonic cameras. If the program can't import the file into the catalog, it doesn't even give you an option to just copy it to the hard disk. It simply pops up a dialog with a list of the files, which you can save.

Shooting directly to your computer can be quite useful, and LR3 makes a start with its tethered-shooting implementation. It's extremely basic and unidirectional--you can see but not change the camera's settings and there's no real-time preview--but for some people it's still sufficient and better than shelling out for extra-cost applications.

Features
Adobe's been touting its overhauled noise-reduction engine, and with good reason: it's much improved, and I think one of the best engines now available. Plus, compared with much of the software out there, it's easier to understand and tweak the settings. I do think Adobe is a little conservative with its default, however, which only performs color NR and no luminance NR. Since luminance NR controls sharpness, I can understand why it's harder to pick a good default value--everyone has differing opinions on the appropriate sharpness/noise trade-off--but just a bit of luminance NR really did make an improvement without sacrificing much visible sharpness in most of the photos I worked with. Shadow areas especially benefit from the improved algorithms, displaying far less clipping, and it does a much better job in out-of-focus areas than its predecessor. On my wish list: intelligent NR that analyzes the image and automatically applies different amounts/types of noise reduction depending upon sharpness and tonal values.

As with the Adobe Camera Raw plug-in for Photoshop, LR3 adds manual and automatic profile-based lens corrections to address distortion, chromatic aberration, and vignetting. At least in the final release I tested, it had a pretty meager selection of predefined lenses, and was missing some important ones, like the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens. And in many cases, I was able to get much better results (for chromatic aberration, at least) with manual tweaking. It's also a bit annoying that the profiles don't tell you what settings they're automatically applying. Adobe is still tweaking its profiles, and we do expect some slipstream upgrades subsequent to launch. Still, I was pleasantly surprised to see one of the automatic fixes remove vignetting caused by incomplete flash coverage, in addition to the lens fix. (I didn't have a chance to work with the custom lens calibrations; read Stephen Shankland's comments on them as well as his take on the software.)

On the effects and retouching front, there are also several changes. For grain freaks, you can now easily make the images shot with your very expensive equipment look like they were shot on a plastic camera with high-speed film. I think the grain controls are pretty nice, but some people might want finer control over the shape of the grain, rather than a generic "roughness" factor. LR3 has also added a couple more vignetting blend modes to its single Paint overlay option that was available in LR2.

One hole in Lightroom's feature set has been the ability to edit tone curve points the way you can in Photoshop. Not anymore. And it may seem trivial, but you can now hide the "pins" the application drops on the image when performing localized retouching operations or apply a graduated filter.

LR3 includes a fairly complete watermark editor, which works in conjunction with the various types of exports to batch watermark images. It's certainly better and more useful than previously, though there are a few tweaks that would improve it for batch output. For instance, I'd like to see the ability to invert a graphic watermark (from black to white and vice versa) on demand; rule-based blend modes so that dark watermarks show up on light areas or vice versa; and the ability to save two watermark placements in a given preset, one for landscape and one for portrait orientations. And it doesn't support native Photoshop or Illustrator files for graphics.

Another big addition to LR3 is a new export interface, the Publishing Manager. Essentially, it allows for more export automation, using monitored folders. With a third-party plug-in it will allow you to automatically synchronize exported photos and take advantage of site-specific features, such as downloading comments from Flickr. Without a real plug-in, it's just a bit more powerful than the existing export tools, because it tracks which photos have been uploaded already.

However, the whole thing feels slightly undercooked. That's partly because there are only two Publish options, for Flickr and Facebook (the latter added in version 3.2). But it's also frustratingly disconnected from Export. Even though most of the settings are the same, you can't import or link to existing Export settings when creating a new service, and if you decide you'd rather use Export--or need just a slight variation of an existing service for ad hoc export--you have to recreate it from scratch. It's also not integrated well enough with the Smart Collections; you should be able to designate collections to monitor within the service, for rule-based automatic publishing.

Though the Print, Web, and Slideshow modules have a lot more templates, the Print module has the most improvements. It's much easier to create custom layouts, and is now capable of non-grid-based designs. You can also drag and drop images into the layouts. But you still have relatively little control over fonts in these three modules. At least, as far as I could tell, because in the drive to leave more of the help content online, Adobe's help systems in general have become pretty useless (although props to the company for using a Creative Commons license on its help content).

Performance
Because Adobe changes the weighting of background versus foreground operations, it's hard to make real direct speed comparisons from version to version. I used Lightroom on four different systems: a 32-bit cement block of a corporate system with 3GB RAM running Windows XP, a multiprocessor Xeon 64-bit Windows Vista workstation with an Nvidia Quadro FX1800 and 8GB RAM, a 4GB dual-core MacBook Pro running OS X 10.5.8, and a dual-core Asus notebook running Windows 7 with 4GB RAM. The slowest system clocked about 4.6 photos per second on in-place import, whereas the Vista system clocked about 13 photos per second, for what that's worth. In general, running in 64-bit seems much faster and smoother than in 32-bit. In general, it does seems faster than LR2, and more memory definitely helps.

Conclusion
Lightroom still lacks some of the frills, like face recognition and decent geotagging support, and some of the new capabilities, like Publishing Manager, won't be truly useful until the developers start delivering their plug-ins. But overall it's a great workhorse tool for processing and organizing photographs.

Publisher's Description

More Products to Consider

All User Reviews

    Results 1-4 of 4

  • 3 stars

    "Wait for Lightroom 4 (beta is now downloadable)"

    February 28, 2012   |   By Cerrito_kid

    Version: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.6

    Pros

    1) If you are just a traditional photographer, Lightroom eliminates the need for spending the really big bucks on Photoshop. Most users of Lightroom, that I know, now do very little to nothing in Photoshop.
    2) If you have a PC, lightroom is the best.
    3) Price has been cut to $149, but that is because a new version is coming. Whether or not Lightroom 3 will be upgradeable and the cost of the upgrade (or the new version) I know not.
    4) For PC users, I give it 5 stars but then cut it because you need to wait for Lightroom 4.
    5.) 3 stars for MAC user when compared to Aperture. But if you know Adobe speak/logic, Lightroom might be okay

    Cons

    1) For MACs, Aperture is equally as good and costs only $80. I don't think Lightroom is worth the additional cost.
    2) Sluggish on my late 2008 MacBook Pro.

    Summary

    For MAC get Aperture. For PC get Lightroom.

    Reply to this review

    Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  • 4 stars

    "Trying Demo of LR3"

    November 29, 2010   |   By bmurds

    Version: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.2

    Pros

    Fast! Complex, makes managing imaegs easy if used correctly.

    Cons

    I am used to Pshop tear off menus and 2 screen workspace. LR seems to strive to HIDE what you are not using.

    Summary

    I like it and will purchase a license for it soon. LR allows me to keep all imagers in 1 place on an external drive and gives me the security of data that I need.

    Reply to this review

    Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  • 5 stars

    "All in one - from simplest to advanced"

    May 12, 2010   |   By ivczan

    Version: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.7.0

    Pros

    - good library organising
    - easy and smooth editing
    - develop, export, web album, slideshow, print - all there
    - simple and fast to work with
    - loads of plugins on web
    - nice interface
    - must have for pros or advanced amateurs

    Cons

    - missing better back-up system (although there is one pretty good)
    - sorting Collections could be simplier (iPhoto style?)
    - using mac i have that PC/Windows feeling from it (i'm spoiled, i know :)
    - some controls seems to do the same as some others

    Summary

    I was trying few applications (avaliable for Mac) for sorting and editing photos from my SLR. I found Lightroom doing exactly what I wanted and even more, but that I leave it to professionals who has the time and determination to do so. Editing photos in the RAW was never easier and with such a speed and efficiency I never seen before. And even more, you can develop several "virtual" copies of your picture without physicaly creating a new file each time - saving your HD. Exporting to web album or to Picasaweb is very easy and is included as a interface or plugin, so is for print (never used thoug as I am using an online print company) and presentation as a slideshow.
    If you are professional or advanced amateur after trying Lightroom (avaliable in trial version) you are gona love it. I am thinking of only one what can beat it and it's Photoshop. But if you don't need the rest of the big package of PS (also the price is different) and will use it only for photos then I would go for LR - well I did :)

    Reply to this review

    Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  • 5 stars

    "Superb program."

    January 20, 2010   |   By catherineford

    Version: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.6

    Pros

    Easy file management. Able to do basic to moderately advanced non-destructive editing easily and well. Works well with Photoshop and Photoshop Elements.

    Cons

    There is a learning curve, though not nearly as steep as Photoshop's.

    Reply to this review

    Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  • Results 1-4 of 4

Add Your Review

Quickly sign in with: or Login or create an account to post a review.
You are logged in as . Please submit your review for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom
Add Your Review

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Update your review

Since you've already submitted a review for this product, this submission will be added as an update to your original review.
Submit

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Previous Versions:

Close[x]

Submit a problem report for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom

Please describe the problem you have with this software. This information will be sent to our editors for review.

Problem:

The Download.com Installer isn't working as expected

The download link does not work

The software has a newer version

The product contains malicious software

Other

Description:

Please select a feedback type.

Please enter a description.

Submit Problem Report

Close[x]

Problem Report submitted

Thank you for submitting a problem report! The Download team is committed to providing you with accurate software information.

OK