SWF Protector (Mac) for Mac User Reviews

• 5.0 stars

  "It is a good program!"

  October 12, 2011  |   By Amar_MK

  Version: SWF Protector (Mac) 4.0

  Pros

  I'm testing a Mac version of SWF Protector. I think This program is one of the best.

  Cons

  I like SWF Protector 4 for Mac. Works against 100% of everything I have thrown at it.

  Reply to this review

  Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

• 5.0 stars

  "Excellent software"

  July 14, 2010  |   By Amar_MK

  Version: SWF Protector (Mac) 2.0

  Pros

  - Simple
  - Fast
  - work against the most popular Flash SWF Decompilers
  - Price is pretty affordable

  Cons

  - More functionality could be included

  Summary

  I liked it from the first time I used it. Works like a charm.
  Waiting for new version to be released

  Reply to this review

  Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

• 5.0 stars

  "Best ActionScript obfuscator I have ever used!"

  June 23, 2010  |   By Roy_8

  Version: SWF Protector (Mac) 2.0

  Summary

  This review was originally posted on VersionTracker.com.
  Pros: - low price
  - pretty simple and reliable
  - cross-platform (Linux, Windows Mac)
  - command line interface available
  - batch file protection in Simple mode (AS2+AS3)
  - choice of protection method and its intensity in Advanced mode
  
  Cons: - it renames original file to original_"name".swf and protected leaves the the same name
  
  Summary: I must say I?m really impressed. It is an excellent tool. The interface is just perfect and it was begging for a drag and drop of the SWF, which I did and it worked wonders. Moreover I had to do nothing, absolutely nothing, just drag the file and click a button. It was perfect! Just like I imagined it.
  
  If you want to protect compiled SWF file so there are several solutions like SWF protector from DComSoft, secureSWF from Kindisoft and SWF Encrypt from Amayeta software. I do have investigated/tested them all and the conclusion is following:
  
  - SWF Protector - as for me it is pretty nice and reliable, simple/user-friendly and cheap. So that is why I am using it;
  
  - secureSWF - reliable and very professional, but as for me - complicated, more expensive of course and from time to time broke my flash games;;
  
  - SWF Encrypt is very expensive for me and actually I don`t know why... maybe there are some powerful algorithms... I have checked the code using decompiler and found nothing except some cycles. Although I am not a very good programmer.
  
  As for the price, SWF Protector gives all the functionality for just 40$, in the same time prices for secureSWF and SWF Encrypt start from 100$ and have limitations.
  
  Regards,
  Roy

  Reply to this review

  Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

• 5.0 stars

  "I like it! This is the best tool I ever used!"

  March 26, 2010  |   By Roy_8

  Version: SWF Protector (Mac) 2.0

  Pros

  - low price
  - pretty simple and reliable
  - cross-platform (Linux, Windows Mac)
  - command line interface available
  - batch file protection in Simple mode (AS2+AS3)
  - choice of protection method and its intensity in Advanced mode

  Cons

  - it renames original file to original_"name".swf and protected leaves the the same name

  Summary

  I must say I?m really impressed. It is an excellent tool. The interface is just perfect and it was begging for a drag and drop of the SWF, which I did and it worked wonders. Moreover I had to do nothing, absolutely nothing, just drag the file and click a button.
  It was perfect! Just like I imagined it.
  
  Summary, if you want to protect compiled SWF file so there are several solutions like SWF protector from DComSoft, secureSWF from Kindisoft and SWF Encrypt from Amayeta software. I do have investigated/tested them all and the conclusion is following:
  
  - SWF Protector - as for me it is pretty nice and reliable, simple/user-friendly and cheap. So that is why I am using it;
  
  - secureSWF - reliable and very professional, but as for me - complicated, more expensive of course and from time to time broke my flash games;;
  
  - SWF Encrypt is very expensive for me and actually I don`t know why... maybe there are some powerful algorithms... I have checked the code using decompiler and found nothing except some cycles. Although I am not a very good programmer.
  
  As for the price, SWF Protector gives all the functionality for just 40$, in the same time prices for secureSWF and SWF Encrypt start from 100$ and have limitations.
  
  Regards,
  Roynald

  Reply to this review

  Was this review helpful? (0) (0)

  Report this post Email this post Permalink to this post

You must be 13 years of age or older to submit personal information to CNET Networks. In compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, CNET Networks does not accept name and e-mail address information from users who are under 13 years of age.

All submitted ratings and written comments become the sole property of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET) and may be used at CNET Networks' sole discretion. Ratings and written comments are generally posted within two to four business days in batch groups, not in real time. However, CNET Networks reserves the right to remove or refuse to post any submission for any reason. You acknowledge that you, not CNET Networks, are responsible for the contents of your submission.

CNET Networks is not responsible for the content of the publisher's descriptions or user reviews on this site. We encourage you to determine whether this product or your intended use is legal. We do not encourage or condone the use of any software in violation of applicable laws. CNET Download.com does not sell, resell, or license any of the products listed on the site. We cannot be held liable for issues that arise from the download or use of these products.