Version: 2008
advertisement
Click Here

Norton Internet Security 2010

1 of 95

Full user review

  • 12 out of 17 people found this review helpful

    2 stars

    Version: Norton Internet Security 2010

    "Improved yet one major fault remains."

    by The Sports Fan on November 22, 2008

    Pros: Improved yet one major fault remains. So much of the good things I've read about it are true but it still has one big issue that I can't overlook.

    Cons: Looks great & scans fast but it has an unforgivable number of false positives.

    Summary: I have an ESET Smart Security license good through 5-2010. Needing a reformat of my Vista Ultimate system anyway, I had a look at this 2009 version of Norton. Onb a clean machine with a corrupt, unrepairable driver, I removes my ESET. Installed this, scanned full & it detected 9 viruses. Two in the registry & seven infected files. Needless to say, this is foolish. I reformatted, installed the same programs & added the exact same data, scanned with ESET & its as clean as a whistle. This is completely unacceptable & for this reason I will not recommend this product.

    Was this review helpful? YES | NO

    Reply to this review

  • 8 replies to this review
  • reply by: bakkler on October 29, 2009

    After 5 maddening years with Norton Internet security and the 4 with a Bit Defender product that started out OK but then went down the drain with recent releases, I tried ESET NOD32, but other than the small footprint I was unimpressed -- especially at that price. So I grit my teeth and decided to try Norton Internet Security 2009. I couldn't believe that it installed so quickly (no-reboot required), and had an even smaller footprint than NOD32 (which was merely an AV)!! There have been a few minor issues/quirks, but less than I've had with any other security program. And NOT ONE false positive, quite unlike Bit Defender. Their Forums are extremely helpful (lots of Symantec employees and experts posting), and the often-frustration India-based Mail & Chat support has been improving. I like NIS 2009 so much I'm reticent to upgrade. Oh, and as for price, CNET currently reports that Fry's is now selling it for 3 users for $9.99 with mail-in rebates!

  • reply by: 2qXcKFSfi9FM on October 12, 2009

    NOD 32 is not perfect either. I had it for many years prior to NIS 2009. This version of Norton found a virus that NOD32 did not. I'm trying to decide if I should go with the new version or stay with the (now much cheaper 2009)

  • reply by: stockyjoe on September 19, 2009

    If you have Nod32 there really is no mreason to switch in my opinion. Even if Norton has imporoved its speed and performance Nod 32 is still fast and non intrusive. Unless your someone that needs to have the Big Huge GUI screens and graphics.

  • reply by: Traxide on September 17, 2009

    I found your summary interesting as I have Nortons 2009 installed and in the last 3 months it has been detecting some of my own programmed software as viruses.
    I am not sure what antivirus program to purchase when my Nortons 2009 expires in January 210

  • reply by: shawnscnet on September 13, 2009

    What? You're full of sh*t!! When you look at AV-comparatives' website, it SHOWS Norton is among the software with the fewest false positives. Stop lying for some other company and get your facts straight!!

  • reply by: demonluo on April 28, 2009

    :) okay, norton not only won AV test in av-comparatives but also win IS test for in pc world...
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/158157/top_internet_security_suites_paying_for_protection.html

    Internet Security Suites Test Result:
    1Symantec Norton Internet Security 2009
    2BitDefender Internet Security 2009
    3Panda Internet Security 2009
    4McAfee Internet Security Suite 2009
    5Avira Premium Security Suite 8.2
    6Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
    7F-Secure Internet Security 2009
    8Webroot Internet Security Essentials
    9Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2009

  • reply by: demonluo on March 21, 2009

    :) to all the hater out there after testing & researching, i can confirm that its not only use less hdd(11mb)/cpu(in-active:1%/scan:10-50%)/ram(in-active:2-4mb/menu-screen:7-14mb/quick-scan:12-16mb/full-scan:5-10mb according to my task manager by average) & update/scan alot faster than avg/avast/nod32/kaspersky/mcafee/microsoft etc but also...

    AV Test Result:
    ok, avira get the highest detection rate but even some lousy brand can do almost as good as that w false positive(F/P), so basically, this charts(a bit old since there r no new one out there for now) confirm that if the F/P take into account, norton 2009 beta(not complete ver), could be better than avira(& keep in mind detection doesn't mean it can remove)...
    http://www.secureblog.info/articles/270.html
    http://security.nl/artikel/22931/1/34_virusscanners_getest,_G-Data,_Avira,_F-Secure_en_Norton_bovenaan.html
    http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/09_02
    http://www.av-test.org/down/papers/2008-04_vb_rootkits.pdf

  • reply by: punkyqb1 on March 19, 2009

    Hi:

    I think you give a good review. All I want to say is, to be fair, I have had good luck with 2009 so far. I have it on two pc's. I personally have not gotten any false positives in the 3+ months I have used it.

    I think the uninstall is a point I can more identify with. It as well as other Norton products are difficult to unintall. It even took a Norton Teck some time(but he did have the right tool and got it done). We did a removal and reinstall.

    What type of system do you run? and what is ESET Smart Suite.

    thank you for your opinion and review!

Back to product review See all 95 reviews

Submit your review

Log in or create an account to submit your review for:

Norton Internet Security 2010

ORLog in with your Facebook account
1. Rate this product:
(Mouse over the stars to rate this product and click to set your rating.)
2. One-line summary:(Summarize your review in one line. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 55 characters
3. Pros:(Tell us what you like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
4. Cons:(Tell us what you don't like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
Bottom-line summary:(Explain to us in detail why you like or dislike the product, focusing your comments on the product's features and functionality, and your experience using the product. This field is optional.)
0 of 5000 characters

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks are prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Submit

You must be 13 years of age or older to submit personal information to CNET Networks. In compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, CNET Networks does not accept name and e-mail address information from users who are under 13 years of age.

All submitted ratings and written comments become the sole property of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET) and may be used at CNET Networks' sole discretion. Ratings and written comments are generally posted within two to four business days in batch groups, not in real time. However, CNET Networks reserves the right to remove or refuse to post any submission for any reason. You acknowledge that you, not CNET Networks, are responsible for the contents of your submission.

CNET Networks is not responsible for the content of the publisher's descriptions or user reviews on this site. We encourage you to determine whether this product or your intended use is legal. We do not encourage or condone the use of any software in violation of applicable laws. CNET Download.com does not sell, resell, or license any of the products listed on the site. We cannot be held liable for issues that arise from the download or use of these products.

advertisement
Click Here