Comodo Internet Security
A newer version of Comodo Internet Security is available.Or, Learn More About Comodo Internet Security
Full user review
"Fails The Big Tests"
There is a "free" version.
It fails a lot or tests.
I am participating in a thread on the COMODO Forum for COMODO Internet Security and it has come up numerous times how great CIS has done on the Matousec test to which I replied...
I had to research Matousec as the first time I ever heard of it was in this thread. As far as I can tell, they test firewalls but make more demands of firewalls that are kind of silly such as key logging. A firewall should protect against and stop leaks. The anti-malware part of the program should protect against and remove malware. Yet Matousec tests with the anti-malware portion turned off.
It also appears vendors can pay Matousec to retest giving the vendors the right to either publish the results or not publish them. This is a mafia-style extortion tactic...
"Hey your product didn't score well in out test. If you don't want the results published, pay up and we will retest it and if the results are still not good then we won't publish any results. This is an offer you can't refuse!"
And apparently they score the results of 10 tests across 11 levels even if they all are not run. Take ESET for example...
In the latest test it got 33% but only ran in 6 tests. Take the total product percentage of 360 and divide it by 6 and it is 60%. All tested products need to be ran across all tests.
I found a lot of criticisms against Matousec...
So in taking all of this into account, Matousec is meaningless to me. I still want to see CIS kick butt at real tests like the VB100, AV-TEST, AV-Comparative, ICSA, and Checkmark. It is not the responsibility of the end user to independently test security software to find the best one.