Comments on: Firefox 3? Not yet
With the early release of Mozilla Firefox 3 Release Candidate 1, the official version 3.0 can't be far away. If it's not going to change much from now until then, why not upgrade now? Peter Butler weighs the pros and cons and sticks with version 2.

and, as i am using the portable version of rc1, i haven't faced any conflicts between ff2 and rc1.
and, as i am using the portable version of rc1, i haven't faced any conflicts between ff2 and rc1.
Loads slightly faster, seems a little peppier, some UI refinements.
rc1 does seem slightly less stable than the beta's - I've had a few crashes, whereas beta's 4 & 5 were rock-solid.
I've also experienced a few site-specific HTML/CSS rendering problems with rc1.
download: http://tmp.garyr.net/tab_mix_plus-dev-build.xpi
discussion: http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7031
Al-in-one sidebar is also essential to me.
This should work for almost all extensions that work in Firefox 3 beta and many that work in Firefox 2.
This should work for almost all extensions that work in Firefox 3 beta and many that work in Firefox 2.
I like fire fox too much
http://tmp.garyr.net/dev-builds/tab_mix_plus-0.3.6.1.080416.xpi
FF3 is noticeably faster on all the sites i visit...In short i'm very pleased with the new Firefox...
btw...more of my favorite extensions and themes are updating every day...In fact my essential extensions are already back.
I am a developer and it breaks all my sites because (I think) the Javascript is not handled correctly, but then again, some of my pages have thousands of lines of Javascript, but they work with IE6, IE7, Firefox 2.0.0.10 through 14, and with Safari on the MAC.
And Real Player, one of the most popular add-ons is not supported. This must be fixed.
- by tiotaco May 21, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
- I'm in my 3rd day with no problems, and enjoying the greater speed.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)