Comments on: New Firefox beta even faster than FF3
Firefox 3.1 beta 1 delivers the fastest iteration of Mozilla's browser yet, although it takes a small tweak to activate the new JavaScript engine.
Firefox 3.1 beta 1 delivers the fastest iteration of Mozilla's browser yet, although it takes a small tweak to activate the new JavaScript engine.
Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.
Add this feed to your online news reader
www.browserasaplatform.com
The only drawback is that 80% of my add-ons don't work with it.
I also did the same test in google chrome, and it improved from 3.1beta(4800), to google chrome(4400), so google chrome if the fastest so far.
Chrome 2754ms
Firefox 3 4843ms
Firefox beta 3953ms
after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms
what does this option do exactly?
after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms
what does this option do exactly?
Personally, I've no real interest in running Javascript faster. I'm much more likely to block it.
If designers would write better code, be it Javascript, html, or whatever; I'm sure the performance boost would
be even better. Lazy web designers. They also need to stop running a lot of their junk client-side,
especially in the "web-apps" department.
Chrome = ~2200
Firefox 3.1 beta = ~2600
Firefox 3.0.3 = ~3100
IE 7 = ~29000
Ran each test twice. While Chrome and FF 3.1 are a little faster, I'm not seeing the leaps and bounds that some people are reporting...
Using a Lenovo T61, T7300 @ 2.0 Ghz, 2 GB DDR2 667.
Opera 9.6 = ~3800
FF 3.1 Beta: 1318.8ms
Chrome: 1518.0ms
FF 3.0.3: 2673.4ms
IE 7: 33884.8ms
We can see that the Beta version of FF is the fastest of the current Browsers, can anyone confirm my results .
Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms
Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms
IE 7: : 37817.0ms
If all of these browsers were each even faster than it's predecessor as the claims claim then double clicking on its icon should have no response to the naked eye because the browser had already opened, downloaded the page and closed again faster than the blink of an eye...
;)
Wasn't private browsing originally something that came with Safari and something that Chrome (and IE 8) copied? To give Google the credit is misleading.
i dont want to press the small "+" at the very right side, i want it right there next to home button.....
- by sims2k October 15, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
- Here are my results:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms
Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms
IE 7: : 37817.0ms