Comments on: Podcaster: So good, Apple won't let you have it
Despite what Apple says, it does not duplicate iTunes functionality. It does much more.
Despite what Apple says, it does not duplicate iTunes functionality. It does much more.
Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Cell phones have so much potential, but are being heavily restrained. I'm sure its all based on the network, and the vulnerability of the networks to be overloaded with streaming data, and constant downloads. We just have to wait out the wireless networks to be abundant and capable of handling larger amounts of data.
Because this function was explicitly forbidden, Podcaster could not access the podcast section. Which means that podcasts from Podcaster did not show up in iTuned or the iPhones iPod section. Which means that a user had to switch over to Podcaster for getting podcasts. Which makes it difficult for users to keep track of podcasts, if they subscribe to them with both iTunes and Podcaster. Which means double downloads, and when you're listen to one in one program, this status does not get transferred over. In short, the program does not achieve the quality that Apple strives for.
The iPhone is not a computer. It needs clear definitions to keep the user interface simple, and information easily accessible. As such, I'm more likely to side with Apple.
If you don't like this, you have to jailbreak. Then you can do whatever you want.
Which also means that Apple or AT&T can refuse service if you do so. Your choixe.
I beg to differ at your point. Duplication of functionality doesn't means that you have to axe something which is better then whats already there. Without doubt Podcaster has something which is better then the native iphone app and if people find it useful then they will completely switch it. They wont go for the native app hence no confusion.
I think if apple has something like this in their contract then its a backdoor to protect their market or applications from developers outside. And from my prospective its lame, something that even Microsoft hasnt resorted too ever.
I want the latter. Firstly, I hate phones: They promote what's good for the carrier or the manufacturer rather than the owner. They tend to have weird limitations in what they can do imposed by the carrier. They are a limited software ecosystem that eventually stagnates. I like pocket computers: They let you run web, mail, games, and creative things such as writing or blogging anywhere. You can count on on the software ecosystem to release any kind of app that would be popular. And it's handy for pocket computers to also have a phone and camera so I don't have to carry these separately.
I think Palm did this right with Treo (which dominated the smartphone market at one point), Microsoft does this right with Pocket PC, and Apple is doing it wrong. They cling to the idea of selling phones when clearly consumers want pocket computers, and they're breaking trust: Users trust the software ecosystem to meet their future software wishes, and Apple breaks this.
I have four macs, and yet I refuse to buy an iPhone so far. The iPhone isn't earning Apple any goodwill from me, quite the opposite.
http://media.libsyn.com/media/kaos/CamiKaos-StrangeLove-Episode039.mp3
Cami Kaos
Dr Normal
www.strangelovelive.com
Apple: nothing but Dijon mustard and extra cheese.
So what we have is a set of very vague rules which Apple apparently feels they can interpret however they want, whenever they want. In one sense of course, they can - their playground, their rules. But if that is how they are going to chose to do business they need to be viewed in the same light as other monopolists such as Microsoft.
Here's hoping that the upcoming Google entry into this market will provide for some real competition (though I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical on that point).
So what we have is a set of very vague rules which Apple apparently feels they can interpret however they want, whenever they want. In one sense of course, they can - their playground, their rules. But if that is how they are going to chose to do business they need to be viewed in the same light as other monopolists such as Microsoft.
Here's hoping that the upcoming Google entry into this market will provide for some real competition (though I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical on that point).
- by limweiseng September 28, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
- Developers said they will boycott and not building new apps.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)If boycott is really their means, they should withdraw all the apps currently available in store.