• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
The Download Blog
advertisement
June 18, 2008 7:47 AM PDT

Statistics show Firefox 3 spreading fast

by Stephen Shankland

Firefox 3 gained market share rapidly, even before it was 24 hours old.

Firefox 3 gained market share rapidly, even before it was 24 hours old.

(Credit: Net Applications)

Firefox 3 is spreading fast, claiming more than 4 percent of the share of Web browser usage less than 24 hours after its release.

According to Net Applications, which monitors browser usage at major Web sites, Firefox 3 rapidly ascended to what I'd call force-to-be-reckoned-with status, something Web designers shouldn't be ignoring. For comparison, Apple's Safari had 6.25 percent share in May, and Opera had 0.71 percent.

Undoubtedly, most Firefox 3 activity is from existing Firefox users, but it's still a notable achievement, given that software companies constantly struggle to get users to adopt the latest products.

Mozilla, which sponsors and oversees development of the open-source Web browser, released Firefox 3 for download on Tuesday. It primed the publicity pump with an effort to set a 24-hour download record, and interest by the abundant Firefox loyalists brought Mozilla's servers to their knees for nearly two hours Wednesday.

Mozilla has been fulfilling pent-up demand ever since. Sometime after 7 a.m. PDT, downloads crossed the 7 million mark, according to Mozilla's download counter, which is fun to watch, even though it's badly formatted.

The download rate, which peaked at 14,000 per minute Tuesday, was about 6,600 per minute Wednesday morning.

For full coverage, including reviews and videos, see CNET's Firefox 3 resource center.

Originally posted at News Blog
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Now on Download: Bigger, better screenshots!
After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges
Shazam iPhone app gets premium Encore
Review redux: Flixster movie app for BlackBerry
Official NASA app and a hovercraft racing game: iPhone apps of the week
Popular iPhone movie app flops on BlackBerry
Must-have utilities for your Windows toolkit
Opera Mobile 10 beta browser: First Look video
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ewelch June 18, 2008 8:40 AM PDT
Heh,

Funny how Apple has a more standards-compliant browser than Firefox.

Good read:

http://www.bigcontrarian.com/2008/06/17/stacking-the-odds/

Firefox fanboys are as bad as Apple fanboys. Who'd a thunk?
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok June 18, 2008 9:03 AM PDT
Nope, nobody's as bad as Apple fanboys. I like Firefox, but at least I don't have to justify overspending on designer hardware.
by Penguinisto June 18, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
...as opposed to MSFT's deck-stacking (that is, you either accept IE on your machine or you don't get Windows at all), right? Idiot.
by dwr50 June 18, 2008 9:06 AM PDT
I use Firefox on Linux,Vista, and Apple OS 10.2.8. Firefox... the one browser that rules them all.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 18, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
Ditto here. Safari is pretty nice, but I tend to use Firefox because I can use it across Linux, OSX, and Windows, no sweat. Safari has no Linux equivalent (except maybe Konqueror, which it got a huge chunk of its original code from), which is kinda sad, because it actually stands a chance of competing with FF. IE doesn't run on anything but Windows (and is still the biggest security hole of them all). Opera I guess I've just never gotten into.
by Penguinisto June 18, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
Stephen: You're welcome :)
Reply to this comment
by cnetcensorssuck June 18, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
....and the clueless, ewelch, are even worse than fanboys. Safari is no more standards compliant than Firefox 3.
Reply to this comment
by WileySkier June 18, 2008 9:49 AM PDT
Firefox 3 is better than the previous version. The only complaint is it sets itself as the default browser without asking you.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 18, 2008 9:58 AM PDT
Actually, I thought it simply kept your previous settings (FF is set as default on everything by one of my Macs, but Safari remained the default there). May be a Windows/Mac thing?
by Shankland June 18, 2008 8:37 PM PDT
On Windows, it definitely asked me whether it wanted to be the default browser--though it checked the box by default.
by JCPayne June 18, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
The ONE thing I would say. Mozilla next time you plan a huge download day. POST the time zone.... There was sooo much mass confusion with people from Australia saying it is June 17th and nothing is available... And then when it reached the USA it was even more confusion... 10am Pacific Time Zone is also not- usually a good time to post by. Nextime tell everyone the time according to Internet time--- a.k.a the UTC time zone.
Reply to this comment
by angrykeyboarder June 18, 2008 9:55 AM PDT
They did post it (just not in the right places). :D
by angrykeyboarder June 18, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
One thing to keep in mind.

Here is my user agent string from Firefox 3 (downloaded yesterday). : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052912 Firefox/3.0

I have been using Firefox 3 since Beta 1 and the user agent string included "Firefox/3.0" starting with RC1. This means the Firefox 3 stats they got could include stuff tracked well before the official release (e.g several weeks before)..
Reply to this comment
by Shankland June 18, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
I think Net Applications is being more sophisticated than that, because they showed 0 percent usage for Firefox 3 until June 17, when the final version was available for download.
by The_Decider June 18, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
"something Web designers shouldn't be ignoring"

Web designers need to test on all major browsers, but they should never, ever develop for specific browsers. Code to standards not browsers.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland June 18, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
I'd think pragmatic concerns would prevail here. Code for the user. Coding to standards is well and good if the page renders well in the browser. But it's telling that Microsoft wants to push toward standards.
by The_Decider June 18, 2008 10:20 PM PDT
Code for the user? Of course, but those are features and has nothing to do with coding to standards.
by June 18, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
"Mozilla has been fulfilling pent-up demand ever since. Sometime after 7 a.m. PDT, downloads crossed the 7 million mark, according to Mozilla's download counter, which is fun to watch, even though it's badly formatted. "

Use FireFox and you will see it is formatted correctly.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland June 18, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
I *am* using Firefox, version 3 no less. The issue is that it expects a very large screen, I believe. (It doesn't work well for me even with 1280 pixels width available.) I just tried it on IE7 and it looks gicky there, too.
by diegoEL June 18, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
Using Safari also looks good. However, IE doesn't display the site properly (oh, what a surprise).
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement
Click Here

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics