Get your hands on Vista SP1
Long gone are the days where Microsoft service pack releases such as Windows XP SP2 would deliver shocks measurable on the Richter scale. Redmond has returned to its old habits of including mostly security repairs and crash fixes, but nothing in the way of new features. That doesn't mean that Vista users should skip out on Vista Service Pack 1.
Downloading anything from Microsoft is never easy, in my experience, and Vista SP1 is no different. Microsoft has announced that it won't begin to roll out the service pack through its automatic updates until April, so you must actively visit the Microsoft Web site and seek it out to download it.
This leaves users with two options: go with the recommended method for home users, the stand-alone update, or forcibly download the 435MB file. I was unable to get the stand-alone update to work, but if you've got Windows Update activated on your machine, you can try it yourself by clicking on the Start button, going to All Programs and hitting Windows Update. Alternatively, you can try through the Control Panel, then System and Maintenance, then Windows Update and Check for Updates.
If neither of those work, this link will take you to Microsoft's download page for the full installer. At nearly half a gigabyte, it will take users on slower connections a while to download. Once downloaded, the file is a self-extracting EXE that took my computer with 2GB of RAM about 40 minutes to install. Also important to note is that not all device drivers are simpatico with SP1, and Microsoft has programmed SP1 to postpone the update push if it detects incompatibilities.
There are no new features to try. I repeat, No. New. Features. So if you don't like the way that the existing Vista feature set looks or behaves, you shouldn't look at SP1 to assuage your concerns. However, since all of the changes that are included are "under the hood," many users should find Vista simply runs better.
Some of the tweaks pertain to bandwidth usage. Microsoft claims that SP1 uses less bandwidth when browsing networked drives, and it seemed a bit faster. Users who are in situations where they need to choose between wireless and wired Internet connections should find that Vista now automatically chooses between the two. However, users of ReadyDrive, ReadyBoost, and SuperFetch will probably see slowdowns until SP1 recollects old data.
BitLocker encryption has been enhanced for the Ultimate and Enterprise versions of the operating system, and you can now encrypt nonbootable drives. Driver response times to sleep and wake-up commands have been improved, and improvements address data loss while ejecting NTFS-formatted removable media. As CNET's Rob Vamosi points out, though, the average home user will see "little or no" changes.
Although I think Vista got off to a rocky start, the various security patches and improvements, culminating with SP1, have greatly improved the performance of the operating system. It's still a bit of an unwieldy and messy beast, and for that I can recommend nothing less than the limited edition Windows Vista toilet paper from the Japanese electronics store Akiba.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 
TRERE ARE THE ONES SAY FREE SCAN BUT YOU HAVE TO PAY BEFOR YOU CAN GET IT FIXED AND TO ME THAT IS VERY MISS LEADING.OTHER COMMENTS???
NLKIPHUTH@LIVE.COM
SP1 sound more like a finally completed product of the original Vista, which MS took more than a year to complete.
Any how, there is no choice for Vista user, but to upgrade it, but just don't expect any high expectation at all, or you will be disappointed.
To djndjnv and amit182..... Vista is more stable than XP RIGHT NOW. I've been using it since Vista first came out on notebooks, and it has worked just fine. No lockups on my parents XP Media Center, now Vista Home Premium computer. No lockups on my notebooks, except when I was installing one game that was KNOWN to have a problem before it was patched or when I created the problems myself by turning on DEP.
Just no problems period and done with.
Secondly, it does speed up a lot of things, and if your system slowed down..... DEFRAGMENT! After a big install like this, it is going to need it in order to get the speed of your computer back.
Secondly, the bootup of Vista Beta 1 and 2 was NEVER fast, in fact it took longer than XP's loadup time because it was.... betaware and wasn't optimized yet.
Third, copying files from one drive to another is ALWAYS slow as crap, especially when it's between two internal drives.... though I don't know what you mean by slow: moved a 2GB file from my hard drive to my parents computers hard drive over a Wireless-G connection.... took only 10 minutes..... Same file on Vista RTM and Retail from Vista to Vista machine took over an HOUR, which is still faster than it transferred from Vista to XP machine and XP to Vista machine, even from XP to XP machine.... 4, 3 and 5 hours, respectively, with me doing NOTHING else on those computers during those transfers.
For the drive to drive transfers.... 2GB transferred in about 3 minutes..... much faster than in Vista without any Service Packs: 10 minutes before.
As to shutdown and startup times: same speed, and I clock with a stopwatch: Vista takes 50 seconds to reach the screen where you input your name and password or just password if you have it set up that way. Same thing for Vista SP1, though I wasn't really expecting a big increase in those speeds.
Oh, and the OTHER reason that Vista Beta was so fast.... no big library of drivers and no huge bundles of drivers that Vista has too look through like now... I really would have preferred that they didn't include ANY extra drivers but the ones for the motherboard, hard drives, and other important things: i.e. no USB things included, no sound card drivers included, etc.
I have run defragmenter and reg optimizer with no increase in speed. What the hell is going on with this Microsoft? FOR GODS SAKE GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER.
The problem, and I am assuming something here, might be that you do not have enough memory in your computer to take advantage of Vista. Anything less than 2GB and Vista is SLOW AS HECK, to be perfectly honest, becasue of all the 'disk thrashing' it has to do.
Hope some others out there have some good luck with the update. =)
Runs fine....
I think, maybe, in some situations PEBKAC....
I noticed during the final step, when it log on to the desktop, that it was preparing settings for Windows Mail 7 (that's right Windows Mail 7, did they push a new version of Windows Mail, I am not sure but the built says, Ver.6.0.6000.16386(rtm.061101-2205) Yes, it says rtm not SP1.
So for the first time in 8 months I encounter a a complete freeze while reading emails and had to shut down completely since it did not recover. After that it has been fine and it seems a bit snappier.
Any comments or advise on the version listed above?
Does anyone else shows the same version for Home Premium, I would realy like to hear some comments
- by will2348 March 22, 2008 9:57 AM PDT
- Cool my mate has Windows Vista and has noticed an improvement however for me i have XP.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)So does anyone know when Windows XP SP3 is coming? or
When the touch screen Windows 7 operating system will be coming out? i know it is in 2010 but does anyone have more details. Visit my profile and contact me.