• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
The Download Blog
advertisement
March 18, 2008 4:58 PM PDT

Get your hands on Vista SP1

by Seth Rosenblatt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 31 comments

Long gone are the days where Microsoft service pack releases such as Windows XP SP2 would deliver shocks measurable on the Richter scale. Redmond has returned to its old habits of including mostly security repairs and crash fixes, but nothing in the way of new features. That doesn't mean that Vista users should skip out on Vista Service Pack 1.

Downloading anything from Microsoft is never easy, in my experience, and Vista SP1 is no different. Microsoft has announced that it won't begin to roll out the service pack through its automatic updates until April, so you must actively visit the Microsoft Web site and seek it out to download it.

This leaves users with two options: go with the recommended method for home users, the stand-alone update, or forcibly download the 435MB file. I was unable to get the stand-alone update to work, but if you've got Windows Update activated on your machine, you can try it yourself by clicking on the Start button, going to All Programs and hitting Windows Update. Alternatively, you can try through the Control Panel, then System and Maintenance, then Windows Update and Check for Updates.

If neither of those work, this link will take you to Microsoft's download page for the full installer. At nearly half a gigabyte, it will take users on slower connections a while to download. Once downloaded, the file is a self-extracting EXE that took my computer with 2GB of RAM about 40 minutes to install. Also important to note is that not all device drivers are simpatico with SP1, and Microsoft has programmed SP1 to postpone the update push if it detects incompatibilities.

There are no new features to try. I repeat, No. New. Features. So if you don't like the way that the existing Vista feature set looks or behaves, you shouldn't look at SP1 to assuage your concerns. However, since all of the changes that are included are "under the hood," many users should find Vista simply runs better.

Some of the tweaks pertain to bandwidth usage. Microsoft claims that SP1 uses less bandwidth when browsing networked drives, and it seemed a bit faster. Users who are in situations where they need to choose between wireless and wired Internet connections should find that Vista now automatically chooses between the two. However, users of ReadyDrive, ReadyBoost, and SuperFetch will probably see slowdowns until SP1 recollects old data.

BitLocker encryption has been enhanced for the Ultimate and Enterprise versions of the operating system, and you can now encrypt nonbootable drives. Driver response times to sleep and wake-up commands have been improved, and improvements address data loss while ejecting NTFS-formatted removable media. As CNET's Rob Vamosi points out, though, the average home user will see "little or no" changes.

Although I think Vista got off to a rocky start, the various security patches and improvements, culminating with SP1, have greatly improved the performance of the operating system. It's still a bit of an unwieldy and messy beast, and for that I can recommend nothing less than the limited edition Windows Vista toilet paper from the Japanese electronics store Akiba.

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Tell the time and destroy the Death Star: iPhone Apps of the week
Windows Starter Kit refreshed for 2010
Big changes in Security Starter Kit 2010
Why to embrace Firefox 3.6's new-tab ethos
Sale: CoPilot Live GPS for iPhone, $19.99
Three apps we're thankful for
Mozilla issues near-final Thunderbird 3
eBay opens auction app for BlackBerry
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)
by NORMAN KIPHUTH March 18, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
NORM WHAT ONES ARE FREE AND WHAT ONES NEED TO PAY FOR AND THEN
TRERE ARE THE ONES SAY FREE SCAN BUT YOU HAVE TO PAY BEFOR YOU CAN GET IT FIXED AND TO ME THAT IS VERY MISS LEADING.OTHER COMMENTS???
NLKIPHUTH@LIVE.COM
Reply to this comment
by Nik_I March 22, 2008 5:42 AM PDT
firstly, learn to write so that you make some sense, and secondly, STOP YELLING!
by saintckk March 19, 2008 3:01 AM PDT
Well, you are absolutely right, no new feature at all! I immediately downloaded the SP1 within 24 hours from it official release, kind of a disappointment after the installation. No immediate improvement was noticeable. Unlike MAC OS X Leopard upgrade, where immediate changes were noticeable with my laptop.

SP1 sound more like a finally completed product of the original Vista, which MS took more than a year to complete.

Any how, there is no choice for Vista user, but to upgrade it, but just don't expect any high expectation at all, or you will be disappointed.
Reply to this comment
by amit182 March 19, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
Going by the past XPerience, I'd be waiting for a SP2 before anything changes or even stabalises with M$ Vista.
Reply to this comment
by djnvdjnv March 19, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
I downloaded & installed it...not impressed at all, seems they went backwards, it slowed down my system, file transfers were slow...the beat before the reboot looping beta was the best, what happened? I'll pass & wait for SP2...maybe
Reply to this comment
by Leria March 19, 2008 1:23 PM PDT
Sorry, but you are wrong about that 'not on Automatic Update' thing. It is on Automatic Updates, my computer just asked me to give permission to install it..... which I have it set to do for everything but security updates, which SP1 is not.

To djndjnv and amit182..... Vista is more stable than XP RIGHT NOW. I've been using it since Vista first came out on notebooks, and it has worked just fine. No lockups on my parents XP Media Center, now Vista Home Premium computer. No lockups on my notebooks, except when I was installing one game that was KNOWN to have a problem before it was patched or when I created the problems myself by turning on DEP.
Just no problems period and done with.

Secondly, it does speed up a lot of things, and if your system slowed down..... DEFRAGMENT! After a big install like this, it is going to need it in order to get the speed of your computer back.
Reply to this comment
by djnvdjnv March 19, 2008 2:19 PM PDT
to LERIA :defragmenting has nothing to do with the fact that VISTA SP 1 is now slow compared to the beta versions, i installed it last night & used it for 2 hours, copying files from one drive to the other took way too long so did startup boot time it also somehow feels glitchy, Vista SP1 was good in beta (superfast boot up & file transfers).. crap in final...they did something to the code before the final release, here come the patches for SP1, i can see it now!!! LOL LOL
Reply to this comment
by Leria March 19, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
Excuse me..... but I used Windows Vista when it was still in the Beta 1 stage, and the speed of Vista Beta 1 and 2 is comparable to the speed of Vista RTM and Service Pack 1.... i.e. both are pretty fast.
Secondly, the bootup of Vista Beta 1 and 2 was NEVER fast, in fact it took longer than XP's loadup time because it was.... betaware and wasn't optimized yet.
Third, copying files from one drive to another is ALWAYS slow as crap, especially when it's between two internal drives.... though I don't know what you mean by slow: moved a 2GB file from my hard drive to my parents computers hard drive over a Wireless-G connection.... took only 10 minutes..... Same file on Vista RTM and Retail from Vista to Vista machine took over an HOUR, which is still faster than it transferred from Vista to XP machine and XP to Vista machine, even from XP to XP machine.... 4, 3 and 5 hours, respectively, with me doing NOTHING else on those computers during those transfers.
For the drive to drive transfers.... 2GB transferred in about 3 minutes..... much faster than in Vista without any Service Packs: 10 minutes before.

As to shutdown and startup times: same speed, and I clock with a stopwatch: Vista takes 50 seconds to reach the screen where you input your name and password or just password if you have it set up that way. Same thing for Vista SP1, though I wasn't really expecting a big increase in those speeds.
Oh, and the OTHER reason that Vista Beta was so fast.... no big library of drivers and no huge bundles of drivers that Vista has too look through like now... I really would have preferred that they didn't include ANY extra drivers but the ones for the motherboard, hard drives, and other important things: i.e. no USB things included, no sound card drivers included, etc.
by Mr Shaun Warburton March 19, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
I Could'nt agree more, My system has slowed down. conpared to pre- SP1 installation.

I have run defragmenter and reg optimizer with no increase in speed. What the hell is going on with this Microsoft? FOR GODS SAKE GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER.
Reply to this comment
by Leria March 19, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
Funny..... everyone else who I have talked to who has installed SP1 and who TIMED THEIR SYSTEMS before installing it said that SP1 neither sped up nor slowed down their systems.
The problem, and I am assuming something here, might be that you do not have enough memory in your computer to take advantage of Vista. Anything less than 2GB and Vista is SLOW AS HECK, to be perfectly honest, becasue of all the 'disk thrashing' it has to do.
by chad633 March 19, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
Install went smooth, no problems there. I haven't noticed any increase or decrease in performance. Everyone's experience will vary depending on their hardware and other software installed on their computer. Vista came preloaded on my HP notebook that I bought in July of 07 and it has worked flawlessly since then. No blue screen and no program hangs or errors. I love vista and wouldn't go back to XP for anything. Guess I'm just lucky! In my opinion user error is the most likely culprit for most peoples computer issues.
Reply to this comment
by FormerlyGoofy March 19, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
I may be the only one so far... but I am actually having better luck with the final SP1 than the RC's. I had the latest RC on my rig up until last night, and had severe slowdown as opposed to my clean install. I installed the final SP1, and I am seeing significantly higher speeds when accessing files, and all of my programs seem to respond faster when launched.

Hope some others out there have some good luck with the update. =)
Reply to this comment
by ferretboy88 March 19, 2008 8:46 PM PDT
I installed it and everything works great.
Reply to this comment
by djnvdjnv March 20, 2008 5:47 AM PDT
Like i said i had better luck with the 2nd last beta before the endless reboot loop beta, that beta was far more stable & quick than this final version...I was actually amazed...the install of this final version was slow hangy & took way longer than the others, so i removed it, the fact that a gaming service i use doesn't work with SP 1 at all is crappy, until the gaming service i use catches up with an update to their player i will avoid SP1, thanx for playing M$
Reply to this comment
by saintckk March 21, 2008 1:36 AM PDT
There's very interesting, I meant that MS is taking a step back where beta is better than the final products! MS are you hearing this? Well, if you are a gamer, stick with XP is a better option! All the DirectX 10 promised by Vista, remain a distant dreams!
by Xemm March 20, 2008 6:32 AM PDT
New machine. No problem with Vista. Downloaded SP1 last night, about 50 minutes from start to finish.

Runs fine....

I think, maybe, in some situations PEBKAC....
Reply to this comment
by Pranav360 March 20, 2008 7:20 AM PDT
No problems with install, really smooth sailing + system is somewhat more responsive and slightly faster.
Reply to this comment
by Boomstickedition March 20, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
The initial slowdown is superfetch relearning since it was wiped during the install process.
Reply to this comment
by BALTHOR1 March 20, 2008 9:58 AM PDT
The power of Microsoft is likened to all of the farmers on Earth,all at once.You have to have milk and you have to have Microsoft.The difference is that farmers make sense to me and Microsoft doesn't.
Reply to this comment
by GEO2003 March 20, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
Installed SP1 and the computer is running smoothly.
I noticed during the final step, when it log on to the desktop, that it was preparing settings for Windows Mail 7 (that's right Windows Mail 7, did they push a new version of Windows Mail, I am not sure but the built says, Ver.6.0.6000.16386(rtm.061101-2205) Yes, it says rtm not SP1.
So for the first time in 8 months I encounter a a complete freeze while reading emails and had to shut down completely since it did not recover. After that it has been fine and it seems a bit snappier.
Any comments or advise on the version listed above?
Does anyone else shows the same version for Home Premium, I would realy like to hear some comments
Reply to this comment
by steinbergi March 20, 2008 6:36 PM PDT
Installed SP1 tonight and no issues at all....works as great as it did before....I did notice my wireless connection seems to be working smoother....I was streaming a video stream from www.ustream.tv before the update and it had to buffer alot...after the update it worked great.....of course other factors could play into that......in summary....no issues at all
Reply to this comment
by gw2212 March 22, 2008 8:49 AM PDT
SP1 downloaded through an automatic update for me.
Reply to this comment
by wacwac01 March 22, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
I am completly baffeled as to what C/net or others expected SP 1 to do -Drive your car? Walk the kids home from school?...Here's a clue...IT'S A SERVICE PACKAGE!!! Downloaded stand alone on 3 home units..noticed improved graphics and recovery speed.....I like Vista, I like Vista!-It's REDMOND that I have trouble with!
Reply to this comment
by will2348 March 22, 2008 9:57 AM PDT
Cool my mate has Windows Vista and has noticed an improvement however for me i have XP.

So does anyone know when Windows XP SP3 is coming? or
When the touch screen Windows 7 operating system will be coming out? i know it is in 2010 but does anyone have more details. Visit my profile and contact me.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics