• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
March 10, 2008 6:09 PM PDT

Print-to-PDF battle: Primo versus Do

by Seth Rosenblatt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

Creating your own PDFs used to require purchasing a PDF-creator like Adobe Acrobat. With PrimoPDF and doPDF, though, all that's required is a program with a print function. Interestingly, while both Do and Primo do the same thing, one is stripped-down and simple, while the other adds an extra step and some extra features to attract users.

Both doPDF and PrimoPDF add PDF output to your Print options.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

DoPDF is the more basic of the two programs. It's utterly bereft of features beyond its main function: to let users create PDF documents from within any program using the native Print option. Along with whatever printer you've got hooked up that shows up in the Print dialog box, doPDF adds an eponymous option. Select it, hit print, and you get the chance to change the name of the PDF you're creating. Hit enter and the PDF gets created, then automatically opens for you to proofread it.

Lacking any customization features and the control panel to manage them, doPDF is definitely meant for fast PDF creation with a minimum of fuss. However, not all PDFs are created equal, and that's where PrimoPDF comes in.

Primo uses the same mechanism to create PDFs as Do does: It lets users create PDFs via the Print function of most--if not all--programs that have a print option. However, the addition of extra features should appeal to more advanced users who need their PDFs to be of higher-than-average quality.

The PrimoPDF output and options menu

(Credit: CNET Networks)

Whereas doPDF just gives a simple output dialog box for altering the name and saving location of the PDF, Primo lets users choose from four preset resolution levels plus a custom-set fifth one. The four others optimize the PDF for screen use, Web use, eBook, or prepress. The variations between them adjust image quality more than anything else, because that will instantly jack up or shrink the size of the PDF.

Three features within Primo's Options window should make it truly appealing to advanced users. Users can edit the document properties, which include adding meta info like title, author, subject, and keywords. You can also set two security levels, one for opening the document and another for making changes to it. The app comes with the ability to wrap up your PDF in 40-bit or 128-bit encryption. You can even specify access solely for text-reading programs for the visually impaired. The third feature lets users specify which program opens the PDF, even overriding your system's default PDF reader setting.

However, all these extras come with a cost: PrimoPDF uses about 40MB of RAM when running. That's not a major concern, except it's about 40 times what doPDF consumes. If none of Primo's features sound useful, doPDF is probably the PDF converter you want to use. But for any project requiring a bit more finesse, there's no reason you shouldn't be using PrimoPDF.

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Multiservice chat and 3D racing: iPhone apps of the week
Seize Seesmic Twitter app on BlackBerry, Android
What's new in Google Earth 5.1? Not much
DJ from your iPhone with TouchDJ
Star Wars Trench Run for iPhone: The Force is strong with this one
Browser security features compared
Touch up your iPhone photos--with cats!
After long wait, Trillian finally comes to iPhone
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Chocobito March 10, 2008 8:49 PM PDT
I prefere MagicPDF its tiny, fast , free and produce very optimized PDF files
Reply to this comment
by simwit March 10, 2008 10:39 PM PDT
Seth, you indicate that PrimoPDF allows you to change resolution levels and doPDF does not. This is incorrect as you there is an option window on doPDF where you can alter the resolution, scale, paper size and orientation. You simply click on printer properties before you print (save) the document.

Both MagicPDF and doPDF are very similar, although I favour doPDF, despite MagicPDF producing more optimized documents, simply because MagicPDF cannot print images to PDF with resolutions lower than 150x150dpi while doPDF allows 72x72, 96x96 and 144x144. This is particularly useful if you have a large collection of pages that you must compress to a sensible size to be able to email across.
Reply to this comment
by Utsav Patel March 11, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
Do Any one of it supports other languages fonts ?
Reply to this comment
by soft_opinion March 12, 2008 11:30 PM PDT
Yes, it's true at least for PrimoPDF which I use. If the particular program from which you invoke the print dialoge supports non-Latin fonts, the resulting PDF document will display them correctly. Please note that installing the support for foreign language in the Regional options for Windows does not mean that you will be able to use them in all applications on that system. Here Primo may provide a solution to some problems. For example, there is no way to use the standard (Western) InDesign for typesetting texts in Arabic or Chinese, and sometimes I simply have to include such a component into a page layout. With PrimoPDF I can generate it from Word or OpenOffice, and save as a hi-res PDF to place as an image in InDesign.
by Chocobito March 11, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
Well, I use MagicPDF in my spanish Windows with spanish document and I don't have any problem
Reply to this comment
by clavall March 12, 2008 8:12 AM PDT
Forget about both of these programs. Try PDF Redirect. It does everthing both of these apps can do plus merge or delete pages. Many languages available. Change resolution. Change destination directory. Fast, stable, easy, small,....Free.
Reply to this comment
by camainc March 12, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
PrimoPDF supports merging, I use it all the time.
Reply to this comment
by Linda Tallstar March 12, 2008 2:05 PM PDT
Would someone familiar with OpenOffice.org PDF creator compare it to these two? I am curious if OO is better than these.

Linda Tallstar
Reply to this comment
by oludir March 16, 2008 9:09 PM PDT
Don't forget office 2007 allows you to save as pdf in two different configurations.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics