• On MovieTome: The next Marvel mutant movie?
January 15, 2008 5:58 PM PST

Nuts and bolts of Vista SP1 RC Refresh

by Seth Rosenblatt

It's called the Vista Service Pack 1 Release Candidate Refresh. It's supposed to be a bug-fixin', feature-enhancin' behemoth that makes Windows Vista leaner, meaner, taller, and sexier.

It'll do your dishes and take out your garbage, too.

Microsoft released this "Release Candidate Refresh" late last week--just one month after the initial release candidate made its debut. The company asserted that it wants additional information from testers, which indicates that even more bugs need to be fixed. But what does RC Refresh really do? Is it really that large? Most importantly, do you need it?

Vista SP1 RC Refresh requires several updates before the actual release candidate can install.

(Credit: Microsoft)

Before we get to the nitty-gritty of whether it's worth downloading, the download itself needs a little explanation. First off, Microsoft warns that the SP1 RC and the Refresh should not be installed on primary or mission critical machines. Make of that what you will. Check out the changelog to Vista SP1 RC. If it's something you think your Vista installation needs, carry on. But keep in mind that, as a release candidate, it's not intended to be a fully stable version.

So, if you installed the original SP1 RC from December, you'll need to uninstall it. Go to your Control Panel/Windows Update/View Installed Updates, and then follow the instructions for uninstalling.

Some people have complained about RC Refresh not installing fully.

(Credit: Microsoft)

The official Microsoft instructions warn users to wait an hour after uninstalling Vista SP1 RC before installing the Refresh because "the installer service needs to clean up and complete the uninstall prior to installing the RC. Failing to do this can result in installation errors when installing the RC version."

Also note that you will be required to uninstall the SP1 RC Refresh before installing the full SP1 when it comes out. That's a lot of installing, uninstalling, and installing to do.

Just like when you were a kid and you had to wait after eating before you could jump back in the pool, you're going to have to get a book or take up knitting before downloading the installer. Once downloaded, extract the files and right-click on the CMD file. Choose Run as administrator. This creates a Registry key to allow the update to install.

Now go back to the Control Panel and go to System and Maintenance/Windows Update, turn automatic updating on, and select Check for updates. This way you stand a better chance of Vista detecting the SP1 RC Refresh on Microsoft's servers. Microsoft's documentation on the installation warns that it can take up to an hour to detect the patch.

The Windows Vista machine I use here runs Vista Enterprise. Vista's many strains includes some versions resistant to certain bugs, and other strains more susceptible. But all versions of Vista will work with the SP1 RC Refresh, which will autoinstall two patches before the full package is installed. However, as with the SP1 RC, the Enterprise and Ultimate versions will install an extra patch to make their BitLocker Encryption functions compatible.

Your system settings will indicate if the Service Pack was installed.

(Credit: Microsoft)

Downloading and installing the patches takes a couple of hours, depending on how many updates your machine needs. However, more than 30 hours after first installing a clean version of the SP1 RC Refresh, it's still finding missing updates linked to the SP1. While the changelog for the initial Release Candidate was long and detailed, the new RC Refresh is beset by a dearth of information.

Given that, the amount of time it will take to load all the patches and bug fixes, and that some of those may not yet be ready for prime time, I'm going to recommend that most users give SP1 RC Refresh a pass until a better update comes out.

Only if you feel incredibly comfortable crippling your machine should you bother with this monstrosity.

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Official NASA app and a hovercraft racing game: iPhone apps of the week
Popular iPhone movie app flops on BlackBerry
Must-have utilities for your Windows toolkit
Opera Mobile 10 beta browser: First Look video
Doom, Command & Conquer revived for iPhone
Mozilla's e-mail group looks toward the cloud
Seven essential free software apps for a new PC
Near-final Thunderbird 3 due next week
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by chustar January 15, 2008 7:33 PM PST
"Only if you feel incredibly comfortable crippling your machine should you bother with this monstrosity."
Harsh, dude. Really harsh.
Reply to this comment
by Marvil12 January 15, 2008 8:56 PM PST
raw
Reply to this comment
by irfakrama January 15, 2008 10:06 PM PST
I want
Reply to this comment
by jifa January 16, 2008 1:15 AM PST
no thans
Reply to this comment
by john3347 January 16, 2008 3:14 AM PST
I tried SP1 RC and it really screwed everything up even much worse than the un-patched Vista was. Even their special error reporting website didn't work. (Probably much overloaded). Chustar calls the authors conclusion harsh, but Microsoft has worked very, very hard with Vista to deserve every word of the assessment.
Reply to this comment
by drmadnan January 16, 2008 7:48 AM PST
vista sucks!! it is sooooooo resource hungry that it cripples my computer. Microsoft should realise that Operating System is a mean to an end, it should not become the end in itself--that's precisely the problem with vista.
Reply to this comment
by tony.will January 16, 2008 10:15 AM PST
Totally agree.Vista sucks the life out of my machine.All games run much slower.I would switch to linux if more games supported it.Have gone back to XP for now.
by dburr13 January 16, 2008 10:18 AM PST
SP1 RC went in fine for me...There is a noticeable improvement in battery life since i installed it in my laptop...So far no problems with the service pack...But i can see where some of the more technically challenged people might have some problems with the installation process.
Reply to this comment
by dusters16 January 16, 2008 3:32 PM PST
I like how my non-vista-certified Dell XPS Gen 2 Laptop is running Vista better than it did on XP. The rc's and refreshes just add to the smoothening out of Vista, making it better, for me at least.

So here's thumbs up for Vista!
Reply to this comment
by romanom January 17, 2008 2:07 AM PST
WARNING- If you have SP1 RC and it doesn't uninstall properly forget you will NOT be able to install any future version without repairing Vista.

I have learned this the hard way! Just wait for the final RTM release.

Just look here at all the people you have gone through the whole process only to have the install fail at the very end. Then Vista will "revert all changes" which takes just as long as the install. You can waist hours for nothing!

http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=1992&SiteID=17

I should have bought an Apple!
Reply to this comment
by AnasQ January 17, 2008 3:08 AM PST
man, it's "waste" not "waist"
use a dictionary!!
by AnasQ January 17, 2008 3:09 AM PST
I like Vista so far, once I got my laptop I had to install up to 300Mb of updates for windows and office 2007.
can't wait till SP1 is out...
Reply to this comment
by GilbertoH January 17, 2008 6:54 AM PST
I just did the update last nigh... (whole night process) the speed was increased, at least for me and lan working..
Finally i was able to set the aero and cost me the same amount of RAM as plain windows vista without the service pack.
But....
After one week only... the computer start to become slow again.... I am not sure what it is because the RAM resources are same, however I still have troubles with the wirelles... I have to disable it and enable it sometimes 5 or 6 times to get WAN connection... LAN connection is ok always...

Note. I am using a Windows CAPABLE PC with 2.5Gigas or RAM.. and Vista Business

Also... to turn it ON, normally take from 3 to 5 minutes... now it take from 2.5 to 3.5 minutes..

To turn it OFF, normally it take 2 minutes... not it take almost 8 minutes.... (real pain when i am on a hurry..
Reply to this comment
by rs3 January 18, 2008 8:44 AM PST
Well for me vista has been running "okay". It really depends on how you use it. I dont have supedup pc; its just a basic computer used for mainly internet. I have disabled the vista theme and and configured some stuff on msconfig and also other little tweaks like the start bar etc. Besides i quite like the classic start bar.

Anyway i say go with vista for who ever want to use it, its gonna end up being one of the vastly used Os's just like xp has bin..............sooo id say wait until a fully tested "less" buggy SP1 comes out.

-cheers
Reply to this comment
by computer_tech February 4, 2008 10:54 AM PST
what makes me laugh is you all think its there fault but over 98% of the time its the fact that users think they know what to do but end up messing it up. for things like vista you need to be sure your cleaning it at least 2 times a week its not like its hard or a time sucker there are many good programs to replace disk defrag such as disk perfect that offers a offline defrag and clearing things like cookies are a 10second process i have vista with minimum ram on a laptop and have little to no problems so go read some books learn how to use your ******* computer then if u still have problems you can blame Microsoft
Reply to this comment
by mammoth213 June 29, 2008 11:36 PM PDT
i really like the look and capabilities of vista
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics