• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
August 14, 2007 10:14 AM PDT

Living with XP

by Peter Butler
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 122 comments
Microsoft Windows XP (Credit: Microsoft)

Although Windows Vista was released back in January 2007, Windows XP still maintains a stranglehold on personal computing. As of June 2007, according to Net Applications, Windows XP is used by 81 percent of all computer users, compared with 5 percent for Vista and 6 percent for Mac OS and MacIntel combined.

In his weekly column, Killer Download, Jason Parker recently took a look at three popular freeware apps that can extend the power and lifespan of your Windows XP system. CCleaner, RAMBooster, and Auslogics Disk Defrag have all become essential XP tools for those of us on the CNET Download.com team.

Have you switched over to Windows Vista, or are you hanging onto Windows XP as long as you can? If it's the latter, what are your favorite applications for extending the power of Windows XP? Tell me about it in the comments.

Recent posts from The Download Blog
Tell the time and destroy the Death Star: iPhone Apps of the week
Windows Starter Kit refreshed for 2010
Big changes in Security Starter Kit 2010
Why to embrace Firefox 3.6's new-tab ethos
Sale: CoPilot Live GPS for iPhone, $19.99
Three apps we're thankful for
Mozilla issues near-final Thunderbird 3
eBay opens auction app for BlackBerry
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 6 pages (122 Comments)
XP until forced to switch
by skiracer712 August 14, 2007 11:43 AM PDT
I havent made the switch because I have seen no reason to yet. XP has been a great OS and there is nothing Vista really has to offer that entices me to switch. It almost seems like it was too soon for a new OS. But with XP, I know all my software and gadgets are compatable. When I switched from 98 to XP, I lost a few games and a scanner. Some friends though, on switching to Vista have had compatability issues with cameras, scanners, printers, mp3 players, etc... This is not Microsofts fault at all but the manufacturers of the gadgets. But we cant expect to be updating all of their drivers and software for older prodcuts when they want you to buy new ones, that are compatable with Vista. Although some of these issues have been fixed since the release of Vista, not all have been or ever will be.

Pretty much all the previous OS's released by MS had some major differences that you couldnt live without. Vista does not have this. With programs like the ones mentioned in the article, yahoo widgets, and various programs to change the appearance of XP, I see no need to switch, unless new software and gadgets are released to only work on Vista.
Reply to this comment
Vista compared to XP
by johnbeeman1 August 14, 2007 12:48 PM PDT
Recently, I purchased a new Dell with Vista. After 3 months of nothing but solid conflicts - Dell kindly took the computer back. Actually, I asked for an XP disk intending to install XP on the new machine, but Dell declined the request. Instead, they opted to take the machine back. With the software I use daily - Vista was just one conflict/problem after another. I intend to hang onto XP as long as I can. John in Fla.
Reply to this comment
Free programs I use on XP
by Nummers_Dad August 14, 2007 12:51 PM PDT
1. AVG Antivirus
2. Bitdefender AV Free (Used to Daily Scan only)
3. Zone alarm Firewall Free
4. Spyware Terminator Free
5. Adaware 2007 Free
6. Spybot S&D Free
7. Spyware Begone Free
8. Spyware Blaster Free
9. Open Office Free
10. Free Ram Xp Pro
I also use CCleaner & Auslogics defrag which you already have mentioned. I have found that my machine has never run so good before using the above free products and Windows XP
Reply to this comment
Living with XP
by grahamhuntington August 14, 2007 12:54 PM PDT
I am still happy with W2000, to be honest, although the sell-by support date is now long gone. I have an XP license, and will move on eventually, but have absolutely no interest in Vista. I am hoping to be able to settle upon a suitable Linux flavour by the time that becomes necessary.
Reply to this comment
XP and Vista
by THHinc August 14, 2007 1:03 PM PDT
I'm one of the odd balls. 3 family members, 3 desktops, 1 laptop, 1 Tablet PC. As it stands on our 3 WinXP machines the 2 differences we have is Avast for AV and FireFox for Internet, and finally CachemanXP to handle memory.

We have Vista on both the Tablet and Laptop. No problems upgrading either one. And everything that we have plugged into it works. We print, take photos, Surf the net, play several Internet based games like Guild Wars, War Rock, etc. From what I've observed, Vista is a minor upgrade for the general user. The only real benifits I've seen are for Network Administrators who have more tools and gadgets to have fun with. But that's just my 2 cents.
Reply to this comment
Stying with XP and switching to Linux
by JLP August 14, 2007 1:05 PM PDT
I've been testing Windows Vista for about two weeks and it has bin a great disappointment to me. There is nothing very new in it, there are still a lot of problems with drivers (for some devices I couldn't even find them), Vista uses waaay to much system resources like memory. When you install it it also take a lot of disk space (over 5 gigabytes!) and still you don't get much useful software with it. So yuu still have to install Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice.org, a good antivirus and antispyware apps. Another bg minus of Vista is also that it contains integrated DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) which is there just to make RIAA and MPAA happy. It is quite pathetic that they needed more than 5 years to make such a bad piece of software. So I'm just staying with Windows XP, which works better. Because I also don't like the direction in which Windows is going I'm more and more checking out Linux operating system, which is completely free and very powerful. You also don't need any antivirus on it as it is much more secure. And when you see how gorgeous Compiz Fusion 3D desktop looks like yuu feel really sorry for all the poor people with Windows Vista. The only thing I miss on Linux are games. But for this I will keep Windows XP, where games work faster than in Vista anyways. For working on internet and other productive work Linux is just great.
Reply to this comment
I Switched to Vista
by spazman00 August 14, 2007 1:05 PM PDT
I have switched to Vista.
I think the Admin controls work better, and the start menu search utility is my favorite aspect of the new OS. Other than that I find that it works much the same as XP.
Reply to this comment
No reason to go Vista yet...
by papajon August 14, 2007 1:05 PM PDT
I agree with skiracer712 all the way. No need to fix it if ain't broke! So why upgrade until you kinda have to? If you keep your system patched, secure (AVG, an assortment of anti-spyware apps, and hijackThis do just fine) and maintained with a defrag here and there, then there's just no need. (In fact, all I've done with Vista is fix it on family and friend's PCs.) Then, the more memory the more better! If you want to upgrade a component or two after that, have at it!

It's a tough call to judge the break point; That is, Vista takes advantage of quite a few features and has some neat options, but on the other hand I can also read my web based email and play a few games off the CD version of Knoppix or Ubuntu.

Honestly what I'd really like to see a study on is Windows O/S degridation over time. Despite my best efforts to maintain a steady, clean, updated system, inevitably machine after machine and O/S after O/S gets slowly slower and slower... until finally I just redo the thing from scratch.
Reply to this comment
I'm not bothering-- for now...
by Jennifoo August 14, 2007 1:06 PM PDT
I wasn't one of those chomping at the bit for Vista when it was released. I knew that developers were being pressured to push Vista out the door before doing the right thing by testing it properly for perhaps a year or less. I know how greedy companies are and how they want their products on the shelf ASAP whether they are ready or not. If I had the money to get Vista, which I don't, I would have wait at least 6 months before getting it since I knew it would have major bugs within.

I'm hanging on to XP because frankly, I don't have the funds to just go out and buy a new computer, since that's what I'd have to do to get Vista. I'm also keeping XP for now because it's having a good run since there are next to no major flaws in it. If it's working for me, why should I be a computer media slave and run out and get Vista?

Personally, I think business aren't getting Vista anytime real soon either because of my above reasoning regarding flaws. They're waiting for Vista to have the bugs worked out of it, too. If I were a business person, I know I'D wait.
Reply to this comment
Why should I Upgrade to Vista?
by nico_mo August 14, 2007 1:08 PM PDT
I have to agree with skiracer, there really is no need to upgrade. Not for me, I've done my homework and I can see how much the upgrade is going to cost me. And its out of the question. Microsoft are currently fixing bugs in Vista, proving thats its just as buggy as XP was/has been and still is.

If I move to a new house then I will move to a new area, I have already tried various Linux distros over the years and I like what I'm seeing and from what I've seen and used the cost in moving to the a Linux distro (with my current hardware, as an office and web box), well the cost is nothing - its all absolutely free ;)
Reply to this comment
Where's Win2K in your analysis?
by jordandw August 14, 2007 1:19 PM PDT
WinXP? Get real. Win2K (SP4) has no product activation. Still auto updating (although that will end I'm sure). Still supports all productivity apps I need/want. When not, then it's on to Linux or web-based apps. Good bye MS -- it's been over 20 years for this loyal user but you lost me with your heavy handed disregard and disdain for users. My machine is my machine, and I want the freedom to do with it and upgrade it as I want -- when I want. When you charge nearly as much for the OS as I pay for an entire self-built machine, and then have the gall to tell me how I may or may not use my hardware with your next-gen OS strait-jackets, then I've no recourse but to head for the open source (open minded) turnstiles. It was nice knowing ya.
Reply to this comment
Hell no...
by smilestill August 14, 2007 1:22 PM PDT
I possess absolutely now interest in investing the time and money in a new operating system that ultimately does nothing that my current system cannot do (and does really well) but does it with twice the server load. General rule of thumb from my experience, wait at least 2 years, and likely 5 before upgrading a MS Operating system. It gives them time to work out the bugs, give the growing hardware costs a chance to fall, and by then there might actually be some software for it.

What does vista do better than XP? For that matter what does XP do better than 98SE? I can't wait for an operatings system that actually changes the way we see the world and work within it; and for the first time ever I am actually looking a mac...

iMac MultiTouch concept: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7500886980042041332&q=imac&total=4178&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
(this is a concept video, not made by Apple, but I am amazed with what Steve Jobs is doing, and wouldn't put it past him.)
Reply to this comment
Living with Xp and Liking It!
by Sidewinder34 August 14, 2007 1:26 PM PDT
I do believe that it's high-time that we XPers left the Vista boondoggle behind us. Personally I am so weary of the endless flogging of a horse that died at birth. A market share of less than 6% falls a bit short of any motivating influence for me to shift to Vista. I'm waiting for SP3 and if that flops, an Apple diet would seem more attractive and appropriate.
Reply to this comment
Vista is not worth it, and probably never will be
by gilligan888 August 14, 2007 1:32 PM PDT
I will not get vista untill I absolutely have no choice. The thing that worries me is there are some games that are only for vista out already.
I have tried vista and I really see no advantage to it for the average user (other than DirectX10). All I see is a power hungry OS for which everyone will probably have to upgrade there computer. So the cost doesn't just end at purchasing a copy of windows.
Windows Xp is nearly perfect now and it does not need a supercomputer (exagerating) to run it.
It seems to me like its just a way for everyone (Not just microsoft) to make money. Thats why it was rushed out.
I would switch to linux like everyone else, I love linux! But one problem still exists with it, almost no game support. And I have alot of games! Yes you can get a emulator, but you have to have a fairly good computer to use it.
So I will stick with XP for now.
Reply to this comment
Essential Program
by spike70 August 14, 2007 1:38 PM PDT
I dont understand why Clipmate is never mentioned.
Imagine a clip board you can see....but a clipboard
with files and the size of your computer!
I honestly could not function without this prog.
Reply to this comment
Saving XP over Vista
by wildroot4 August 14, 2007 1:46 PM PDT
I am a software developer and I incorporated DotNet Framework into my application. When Vista came out, I knew it was a disaster. So I started testing Mono. It loads in Linux and then allows me to load and run my dotNET program native. I am getting ready to kiss Windows goodbye.
Reply to this comment
xp and linux is the way to go for now
by mario_echavarria August 14, 2007 1:46 PM PDT
I agree JLP xp and linux is the way to go. Linux is great for Surfing, emailing, chatting and research. Plus linux has an open office suite to install on many computer along with the operating system on as many computers and laptops as u wish with out paying for extra licenses or fees. XP is great OS and linux is a powerful OS capable of doing as well and microsoft and exceeding it. I personally like both. Like 3 month ago a brought a brand new laptop with vista in it nothing but disappointment and wireless conections would drop constantly outside the yard less than 50 feet from my wireless router. Kubuntu linux works great on laptops and its compatible with most of all hardware. Ubuntu linux is another one to try. xp is good also linux is the same, good to try and to keep.
Reply to this comment
VISTA vs XP
by ShamuPA August 14, 2007 1:47 PM PDT
Reason for me to stay with XP is gaming.

Apparently VISTA does not support OpenGL causing some games, such as MOH, to perform poorly.
Reply to this comment
Why to upgrade VISTA
by ankur_gupta555 August 14, 2007 1:55 PM PDT
I am using windows xp sp2. it is working fine and I have 1 GB of RAM so that I can do video editing in premiere.
If I upgrade to VIsta then I think premiere will need more RAM and all other app of creative suite.

The main reason I am not switching to vista is its High System confiuration requirement.

Mucrosoft should release another OS like vista which does not need aero(buit have nice theme) and tooks less RAM.

Also I need some start menu and windows explorer enhancements to work fast on windows xp. but for only two reasons I will not upgrade to vista.
Reply to this comment
Keeping Windows Working Properly
by weaverrr August 14, 2007 2:04 PM PDT
I have become a real fan of System Mechanic 7. I have long given up on the tools provided by some of the major software distributors. System Mechanic 7 works quietly in the background to keep my computers humming along without any major glitches.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 6 pages (122 Comments)

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics