• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
The Download Blog
advertisement
May 16, 2007 11:24 AM PDT

Google's malware witch hunt

by Jessica Dolcourt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments
Malware worm (Credit: CNET Networks)

Ten percent of the 4.5 million URLs Google researchers analyzed for a malware expos? harbored malicious code. The code executes through widgets, ads, compromised downloads, server vulnerabilities, browser holes, phishing lures, and links, making infection possible for even ordinarily safe users.

CNET.com's Robert Vamosi has the full story, and CNET Download.com has programs to add muscle to your antivirus armor. Netcraft Toolbar (for Internet Explorer and Firefox), is an antiphishing browser extension that sniffs out suspicious hosting locations common in spoofed sites.

LinkScanner Pro and LinkScanner Lite, both from Exploit Prevention Labs, analyze URLs for real-time threats. The tool rates pages with a color-coded system. Green, yellow, and red ratings indicate that pages are, respectively, safe, suspicious, or threatening. The free "Lite" version identifies threats, and the "Pro" version blocks threats and adds an additional security layer.

McAfee SiteAdvisor (for Internet Explorer and Firefox) and McAfee SiteAdvisor Plusalso use the three-color rating system. The green, yellow, or red rankings are based on the "safety" of hosted links and downloads, and the number of spammy e-mail messages received in a week.

With the exception of the Plus version (commercial software), the results reflect the status of the site the last time it was tested, so a slippery Trojan or browser hijack could burrow into a site marked "green," or "safe," without immediately changing the site's color-coded status. February's Super Bowl hack of the Dolphin Stadium Web site is an example.

SiteAdvisor's most obvious benefit is in highlighting known danger-sites, for example sites advertising free music or services--these are notorious for hosting or attracting malicious code. Visual clues that broadcast a site's security status or specifically seek to block threats are a key ingredient to staying safe online.

Correction: A previous version of this post incorrectly described how McAfee SiteAdvisor tests and rates Web sites. McAfee SiteAdvisor uses automated testing programs to test for the three criteria described above.

Jessica Dolcourt reviews the latest and greatest smartphone apps, in addition to a healthy dose of Windows software. E-mail Jessica and follow her on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Multiservice chat and 3D racing: iPhone apps of the week
Seize Seesmic Twitter app on BlackBerry, Android
What's new in Google Earth 5.1? Not much
DJ from your iPhone with TouchDJ
Star Wars Trench Run for iPhone: The Force is strong with this one
Browser security features compared
Touch up your iPhone photos--with cats!
After long wait, Trillian finally comes to iPhone
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
It's 1 in 1,000 sites, not 1 in 10
by strayer May 29, 2007 4:54 PM PDT
Google's own security blog corrected the mistaken impression that 1 in 10 internet sites was bad. In their study, they looked only at sites that were already considered suspicious and found that 1 in 10 of the suspicious sites were in fact bad. However, they said, only 1 in 1,000 sites on the Internet meets their criteria for malware.

Other studies, such as McAfee's Site Advisor search safety study, posted on the site's blog, say that 1 in 25 sites searched on Google are rated red by Site Advisor.

While the two studies vary greatly in their assessment of what constitutes a dangerous site, no one is suggesting that 1 in 10 sites is malicious.
Reply to this comment
Ku Ku je ti sante A
by LindonLuli August 16, 2007 2:30 PM PDT
Naniqkoooo A po te pelqen comenti
Reply to this comment

Search Download Blog posts

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics