AVG Free 9 offers speed, lacks etiquette
CORRECTED October 15, 2009, 11:45 a.m.: The default search choice is not changed, as was mistakenly reported earlier. Also, it's not the user's home page that gets changed, but the new tab page. I've clarified the nonmandatory nature of the LinkScanner toolbar, and added information on the identity theft feature in the toolbar.
After giving its paying customers a few weeks to upgrade to version 9, AVG has announced its update for AVG Free 9.
For those unfamiliar with the popular freeware security tool, it provides only the bare necessities for protecting your PC, but that should be enough for savvy Windows users. AVG Free 9 introduces few new features, with improvements focused on performance, including claims of faster scan and boot times. AVG is claiming that scans are 50 percent faster compared with AVG 8.
AVG comes with a combined antivirus and antimalware engine, the proprietary LinkScanner for Web browsing safety, and e-mail scanning. Developed independently and bought by AVG in 2007, the LinkScanner tech performs two functions. It protects you from third-party code exploits before they load in your browser and it ranks search results.
Annoyingly, the optional AVG LinkScanner toolbar commandeers your new tab page, decidedly inappropriate behavior that a security vendor should really know better than to do. LinkScanner can be downloaded separately from AVG, too. The scheduler is robust, automating both scans and updates with multiple options.
One new feature in the new version is the the Identity Theft Recovery Unit. Only for users in the United States, ITRU is a business partnership with Identity Guard which provides "consumer identity theft solutions." Accessible only from the browser toolbar, which only works in Firefox or Internet Explorer, the service provides "a dedicated identity theft recovery unit with fraud experts," to assist handling, getting and analysing a credit report, enrolling in credit file monitoring, and offering report-filing support.
The interface in AVG Free 9 remains nearly untouched from the last version, and generally it's easy to use. From the main window, though, you must double-click to get further information on any feature, whether virus scanning, LinkScanner settings, or updating. Streamlining this to one click would be helpful.
That ad in AVG Free 9 can be easily hidden.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)When starting a scan, a slider makes it easy to jump between Slow, Automatic, and Fast scans: the faster the scan, the less comprehensive it is, so it's a good idea to take the program's advice and optimize your scans when you install. This will make that first scan faster. A slow scan took nearly 2 hours, while the fast scan completed in under an hour. A progress meter for these regular scans would've been useful, though. Should a virus create serious problems, AVG creates a rescue disk to scan your computer in MS-DOS mode.
Besides the LinkScanner problem, there are some other concerns with AVG. It doesn't tax your system in an obvious way when scanning or when running in the background, although CNET Labs determined that it will significantly slow down your system's boot time and will slightly delay shutting down. AVG detected some image files as threats, when two other security programs decided they weren't--these were fairly obvious false positives. There is an advertisement to upgrade at the bottom of the program window, but it can be easily hidden using the Hide Notification button.
AVG might not be the fastest or the most effective free security option, but it still gets the job done and you're better off with it.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 






So what is? And how would you test the effectiveness of each one?
I too would like to know what other security options there are that are faster and more effective than AVG.
It installed in less than 2 min and I scanned my full system in less than 30 min...with over 500,000 files.
Another issue with the free version of AVG is the exclusion of Rootkit protection; there are some really nasty rootkits around, and they are a B*** to get rid of. As for MS security essentials, I'm giving it a try at the min, and it seems ok, if a bit basic, but i dont like the fact that it reports back to MS on what it finds, though many paid AV's do it too.
Fastfoward to 2008
The same system from back in 2002, i installed the newest version on AVG Free, and nearly cried, the system came to a screeching halt and i could barely click start much less open up a web browser.
AVG was the AV i recommended to everyone without batting an eyelid but all this extra stuff and the added time to system boot up, i really cant deal with anymore, epically on systems with limited RAM.
Maybe they should go the route of NOD32 or MSE and do a basic and lean Anti malware/spyware+antivirus app.
I loved AVG back in the day, hell i even looked forward to the scan icon in the system tray. It gave me a feeling of my system being protected.
IN all honesty, if you update you browser and stay away from questionable sites, you won't need that browser add on and just using some good common sense would minimize most of the possibility for trouble.
The Firewall in Windows Vista and 7 is pretty good and if ur behind a router ur safe enough.
AVG, go back to how u were i miss you!!!
For people having problems with the "Rogue Anti Virus" keep in mind that you might have to boot into safemode to get that cleaned and you might try using Malwarebytes.
The free programs are terrific because they offer good protection and provide the companies with valuable information such as threat analysis and testing data which can then be used to improve the paid versions of their software. Lots of people download the free versions which gives these companies a huge testing pool. Microsoft realized this when OneCare didn't sell so they re-jiggered it, offered it for free and will use the data to improve their award-winning enterprise security suite, Forefront. They explained it on their blog this past summer. http://blogs.technet.com/forefront/archive/2009/06/23/microsoft-security-essentials-formerly-morro-and-forefront.aspx
The user is provided options during the installation of AVG to:
1. Install the AVG Security Toolbar
2. Set Yahoo! as the default search provider
If the user does not choose Yahoo! as the default search provider during the initial setup, no changes are made to any of the users default search settings for Address Bar, or Chrome box search. It is only if the user specifically chooses Yahoo! will any changes be made to default settings. AVG gives the user complete control over whether they want the toolbar and if they want Yahoo as default search.
http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net/
http://distrowatch.com/
There's nothing weird about it. All AV and other anti-malware solutions have their very own signature databases. Therefore, each database is different. That is _why_ AV a can detect something that AV b didn't. That is also why it's an extremely good idea to use an online scanner like the one F-Secure offers (described in my main post titled "QUIBBLE!"
In addition to that, malware writers are putting this stuff out MUCH faster than any of the Anti-malware companies can keep up with.
(Windows XP waiting for Windows 7)
The installation of AVG9 detected a "partially incompatible" application, namely ZoneAlarm (why incompatible?) and gave the options to uninstall Zonealarm or skip this step. I skipped the step and the installation disabled ZoneAlarm anyway. Not even ?are you sure??.
This is the last straw for AVG as far as I am concerned.
I am dumping it and installing Avast.
I think it would be a LOT more accurate to say, "Some security programs don't 'play nicely' with other security programs. When this happens is when the two programs are conflicting with each other. This type of behavior is not limited to AVG."
Yet another grade school grammar lesson to be had there. ] : )
- by Andrea-L October 15, 2009 3:36 PM PDT
- Too much false positives. Again!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by veer01 October 16, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
- Another common problem, my cousin writes all sorts of nifty apps, but he doesn't fill in a lot of developer info and when avast reads thru the file ID's just assumes its a virus and bones me in the rear. Avast does the same as well. So annoying. Haven't had that problem with Msoft Security Essentials at all; fingers crossed and praying it keeps up XD
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (75 Comments)I'm sorry but AVG is not for me.