The Download Blog
advertisement
September 7, 2009 5:00 AM PDT

Opera 10 browser: First Look video

by Jessica Dolcourt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments

Opera 10 (for Windows, Mac, and Linux) is less than a week old, and the browser has already caused quite a stir among fans (just check out the comments). It has also inspired many a comparison with the more-often downloaded (and extension-rich) Firefox, and with the upstart browser Google Chrome which, despite its newness, has managed to unseat Opera as the fourth most popular browser.

That leaves you asking how Google's young Chrome browser, just a mewling infant in its lifetime, has already ousted a browser that's been publicly available since 1996. Is Opera really that bad?

Not at all. In fact, Opera pioneered some of the industry's features, including the Speed Dial feature that has since been adopted and adapted in Google Chrome. It also includes useful hooks to your Web mail, mouse gestures to help you navigate with that favorite of peripheral devices, and a built-in RSS reader.

How, then, does one explain Opera's uncomfortable fifth place in the consumer browser category? As with most situations of market share, there is a range of factors we could debate at length. One push factor, I'll argue, is Opera's lack of extensions support. True, it does have its own version of third-party apps for developers, called Opera widgets, which are mini standalone apps that float around the screen (here's a collection of game widgets rounded up by one of CNET's bloggers). However, widgets aren't the same as Firefox's popular, incredibly numerous, and quite inventive extensions. For a start, they pop up independently of the browser, so you need to keep track of them yourself. More significantly, they're limited in number. With my picks, performance has ranged from not-very-exciting to a letdown.

As for Google Chrome's ascendancy, its famous pedigree is an undeniable draw, and as Chrome grows in strength, Google will have even greater advantage to advertise its new browser around its network, as it does now on YouTube.com. However, Chrome's other great advantage, and one constant threat to its browser rivals, is its speed. For awhile there, Google made an intensive push to outperform Firefox, with the two leapfrogging each other in the final pushes of their beta builds. Opera, while working on its own back-end speed enhancements, hasn't produced the kinds of test results to steal the others' thunder.

Opera claims it has increased its browsing speed, and is offering an interesting solution to global users with fitful browser speed to boot. Opera says that Turbo, its compression engine, can increase browsing speeds up to eight times faster than on other browsers suffering from the same network holdup--but we still haven't seen independent test results on this.

Regardless, while browsing speed is important, on our fast data connections on multiple computers, Opera 10's performance never came into question in our tests. We suggest you try it out to see how you like its new look and its take on browsing enhancements, but for a view of its new features before you commit either way, check out the First Look video above.

Jessica Dolcourt reviews the latest and greatest smartphone apps, in addition to a healthy dose of Windows software. E-mail Jessica and follow her on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
The 17 best iPhone games of 2009
Mozilla hopes to finish Thunderbird 3.1 in April
Woo-hoo! Simpsons Arcade game coming to iPhone
Adobe adds raw support for newer cameras
Mozilla releases fifth Firefox 3.6 beta
What's next for social gaming on the iPhone?
Fences Pro: New ways to conquer clutter
TomTom slashes iPhone GPS app to $49.99
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by forever4now September 7, 2009 5:34 AM PDT
People need to stop "polluting" the internet!

Try the following Acid3 test, on IE 8 (or earlier) and compare the results to Firefox 3.5, Chrome 2, Safari 4 and/or Opera 10. IE fails miserably, while the other browsers pass with flying colors (see Wikipedia, for a description of Acid3).

http://acid3.acidtests.org/

Now...try viewing the following HTML5 video, with IE 8 (or earlier). You CANNOT!

http://demo.sproutcore.com/video/

Try viewing this same video with Chrome or Safari. You CAN! And, it looks AWESOME!

Face it. Microsoft resists standards. It prefers to do what it wants, the way it wants, whenever it wants. And, as a result of IE's large market share, this makes the lives of web developers miserable & stifles web innovation.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF POSSIBLY WAITING YEARS, FOR IE's PAINFULLY SLOW MARKET DECLINE, TO BE ABLE TO BENEFIT FROM AN INTERNET BASED ON OPEN STANDARDS?

The internet community can make it happen NOW!

- Encourage/help your family & friends, to move to standards-compliant browsers.
- Encourage your employer, to use a standards-compliant browser (or install a 2nd, if there's an IE dependency).
- Have standards-compliant browsers installed on shared computers (libraries, schools, internet cafes, ...).
- Buy PCs from vendors who default to a standards-compliant browser (e.g. Sony).
- Buy smartphones, eReaders & other mobile devices, equipped with standards-compliant browsers.
- Buy game consoles, TVs, set-top boxes, etc., equipped with standards-compliant browsers.

Perhaps, the W3C should even offer stickers, that can be placed on a vendor's box, that say "X.X-compliant browser installed", to help consumers & businesses choose products that support the latest web standards. This would have the added benefit of giving vendors, who support & promote open web standards, a marketing advantage over their competitors.

REMEMBER: Every time you launch a non-standards-compliant browser you are, in essence, "polluting" the internet. Please, STOP polluting the internet, so that EVERYONE (developers & users) can enjoy the benefits of it!
Reply to this comment
by SX10 IS September 7, 2009 10:52 AM PDT
Hm, for some reason Firefox 3.5 only scores a 93/100 on the Acid3.
by Lennron September 8, 2009 11:25 AM PDT
HAHAHA! It's comments like this one from forever4now that make me all the more proud to be using IE8. I don't care what the acid3 tests says, IE8 runs faster and smoother on my computer than any other browsers I've tried with the exception of Opera. Even then, there are plenty of websites that don't load correctly with Opera, so it's still not worth using as my default. I'll keep on proudly "polluting" the internet, and encourage that others do so as well. Thanks, but no thanks. :)
by keepitsimpleengr1 September 7, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
I like and use Opera.

But why does drag & drop for URL links not work?
Reply to this comment
by Cradelikz September 7, 2009 12:53 PM PDT
I have all current versions of the five contenders (Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Safari and IE).
And I love somehow all of them, just like a father loves his sons I believe. And in the very same way I do have my favorite, which is Opera nowadays.

It started being FF, but even with all the extensions and all the improvements, trust me, the feeling using Opera is different and I'm a Firefox fan too. Chrome it's cool, but all that blazing speed cannot compare to the vibe too. Safari well it has it's cool features, but I think there's plenty of work needed to be an actual winner. And IE, we all know how it is with IE...

Try Opera, you won't be disappointed, trust me.

PD: I haven't had a single crash on Opera not even on the Beta. But for all the other choices I must admit even Chrome has crashed with simple tasks.
Reply to this comment
by Hellspork September 7, 2009 5:00 PM PDT
Very interesting. I must say that Chrome still feels buggy and slow, benchmarks notwithstanding. Script speed is not as important as drawing speed. When Firefox went to v3, I soon switched back to Opera for most of my browsing. Safari is fast, but has page issues and the special effects can stutter. IE8 is fine for Microsoft sites that purposely hinder other browsers.

There have been comments about speed and memory use. To this I respond that Opera can be very spartan with its needs. The below link contains some detail of what Opera can accomplish:
http://my.opera.com/hellspork/albums/showpic.dml?album=875612&picture=11984306

I have more than 400 tabs open in this copy of Opera, with several less intensive installs also running. I have been switching among all of them. Everything has been up for three hours now. This largest install has averaged 25% of my cpu. My smallest session is a Firefox3.5.2 window with 10 tabs and no extensions, averaging 15% of my cpu. I have 480MB available memory from 2GB, XP-SP2. Firefox with 10 tabs is drawing 100MB-RAM/150MB-Paging, Opera with >400 tabs is drawing 710MB/1.2GB. When I minimize Firefox, there is no change; minimizing Opera reduces memory use to 190MB/1.2GB. A bare install of Opera with four tabs open, minimizes to less than 1MB on my computer.

I find that turbo is most useful when other programs are competing for connection speed. My downloads finish faster in the background, and the effect is strongest when rapidly skimming through sites that use too many banners with plugin content. Turbo uses less memory, cpu, and bandwidth, leaving more resources for other tasks.
Reply to this comment
by exactlyy September 7, 2009 5:48 PM PDT
i am a firefox user , and tbh i am liking this version of opera , its just fast, light and ready to rock .. i only have one question to the opera experts ..
i like everything in opera but the only thing that i miss and i dont know if it can be fixed is ..
when you want to search using the search box in speed dial or in the tool bar, is there a way to make it suggest keyword while i am typing ?? like the search bar in Firefox .
thanks in advance.
Reply to this comment
by SX10 IS September 7, 2009 6:47 PM PDT
Here is my analysis of why Opera is at 5th place in the line-up.

It is not affiliated with anything BIG.

- Internet Explorer is by Microsoft
- Safari is by Apple
- Chrome is by Google

(Mozilla Firefox is at the 2nd spot because of its expandability and open-source nature, as well as a hell of a lot of promotion.)

Opera, on the other hand, is by some Norwegian company people rarely hear of. Opera Software, anyone?

Agree/Disagree?
Reply to this comment
by Lennron September 8, 2009 9:27 AM PDT
Agreed. IE is #1 because it's standard on Windows, Safari is #3 because it's standard on Macs. Combine those two and you get (for the most part) people that are satisfied with their defaults. Firefox is #2 because it brought on many ideas while IE6 sat on it's fat ass. And Chrome only got to where it is because it's Google's baby and everybody knows Google. Otherwise Chrome would be pretty much unheard of just like Avant.
by JamsFL September 8, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
IE 8 from Microsoft sucks, it's slow and unresponsive compared to Firefox, Firefox has 1 Billion downloads, supports standards and is one of the fastest browsers out competing with Google Chrome, Opera waited too long to drop the Paid version of it's browser and now it's playing the catch up game in terms of popularity. Once Google chrome gets full extension support Opera will be left in the dust,
by SX10 IS September 7, 2009 6:49 PM PDT
Here is my analysis of why Opera is at 5th place in the line-up.

It is not affiliated with anything BIG.

- Internet Explorer is by Microsoft
- Safari is by Apple
- Chrome is by Google

(Mozilla Firefox is at the 2nd spot because of its expandability and open-source nature, as well as a hell of a lot of promotion.)

Opera, on the other hand, is by some Norwegian company people rarely hear of. Opera Software, anyone?

Agree/Disagree?
Reply to this comment
by khamma September 8, 2009 6:30 AM PDT
I can't get the video to play. Why?
Reply to this comment
by sexyandy81 September 13, 2009 3:38 PM PDT
If you got the turbo set to on then the video won't play you need to set the turbo to automatic and then it should solve your problem.
by victorcrums September 8, 2009 11:26 PM PDT
Yeah, I'm agree...
Reply to this comment
by thorpelad September 13, 2009 7:12 AM PDT
It makes me smile reading all this dribble by so called computer buffs! Who needs all these big five browsers(sounds like big banks) My default browser is simple,fast, attractive and reliable. You know what its called THE WORLD BROWSER! Try it and you will find out.
Reply to this comment
by flex2k10 September 13, 2009 10:40 AM PDT
I agree as well. Firefox has always been my default. Not because of its popularity or has a high market share, but simply cause it works. Firefox has let me down on a number of situations in terms of crashing, slow speed, and rendering incompatibilities.I'm always open to new technologies, and Opera well, it's in a world of its own. I don't think you could 100% compare other browsers to this one. Lets not forget that just because there based out in some other country that they don't have a higher market share anywhere else (Europe, Russia, Japan, China, Philippines, etc...) I have to say Opera 10 has greatly improved to support standards and is almost equally fast as any other. I'm hooked on Opera now and the best thing is I don't have to look around thousands of extensions. to get what I need.(all the extensions I have in Firefox has greatly slowed and put my PC at risk for invulnerabilities as I have notice throughout the years.) Opera isn't perfect, But has done enough to get me as a user. Everything out of the box, and they work flawlessly. I honestly don't care about market share to say the least. All I know is that Opera has got me hooked and with very good reason. This is how browsers should really be in terms of out of the box. I have taken the time to learn all of its features and can now say this is the best of the best. If your a simple Internet user who just need to surf, download and log off by all means use IE, FF. Opera in my own opinion, was made for those who really want to get the best out of the Internet and faster, Such as the tech savvy. It's not for everybody but it could be.

Extension are great, (FF) but really, many have suffered crashes and a decrease in performance. As in Opera you always get the same performance and experience less or no crashes at all. I will keep using FF for those pages that do not not support Opera, but that has become something I hardly ever have to do now. I like Firefox, the new IE8, the speedy cool looking chrome, but I am really glad to have Opera as my default..Cheers!
Reply to this comment
by sivapratap September 13, 2009 8:05 PM PDT
One of the biggest disadvantage that Opera has is it does not give an option for you to bypass the security warning that it shows for some site. All the other browsers leave it to my justification on whether or not i want to browse that site. Showing a warning is not a problem, but it should allow me to browse whatever site i need. In fact, it does not allow me to open my office email because "Security can not be trusted!!!???". That is why, i installed Opera and used for sometime, and when i want to see my office email i try that, and Opera does not allow me to do that, i get frustrated and uninstall the browser itself. I have done this for so many times till now. And Opera 10 is not different than that.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics