Microsoft Security Essentials not quite a must-have
Updated June 25 at 12:50 p.m. PDT: Several commenters pointed out a secondary scanning process that runs while a scan is running. While Microsoft Security Essentials uses little memory when not scanning, during a second round of tests it used 60MB to 70MB of RAM, while consuming around 200MB of Virtual Memory.
Updated June 24 at 11:30 a.m. PDT: The 75,000 available slots for testing Security Essentials have been taken. There is no word at the moment whether Microsoft will allow more testers to download the public beta in the future.
Microsoft on Tuesday released its latest foray into security software as a limited beta. Microsoft Security Essentials, known in development as Morro, is limited to 75,000 downloads in four countries: the United States, Israel, Brazil, and China.
Security Essentials contains all the basic features that users have come to expect from free security software: multiple built-in and customizable scan options, a scheduler, automatic definition file updates, a real-time defense shield, and rootkit protection.
It's been a bit hard to gauge user interest at this point. Despite the download limitations, I was able to download the installer onto one computer at 10:15 a.m. PDT, and another at 10:45 a.m. Microsoft has also said that the download cap might be lifted at a later date.
This hands-on will be limited to testing the on-board features since CNET doesn't maintain a virus zoo for security reasons. Also, users should note that Security Essentials will run a Windows Genuine Advantage check before installing. If you're running an illegal copy of XP or Vista, you're out of luck here. The program will run on Windows 7 RC, and there's a separate installer for users with 64-bit operating systems. The 32-bit installer for Windows Vista and Windows 7 was small, weighing in at 4.73MB.
The main interface of Microsoft Security Essentials is streamlined and uncluttered.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)If you're familiar with other free antivirus solutions such as AVG or Antivir, Security Essentials will probably strike you as an incredibly similar experience. The program opens with four tabs: Home, Update, History, and Settings. When you first start the program, it will ask you to update the definition files. This was a surprisingly fast process, taking about a minute when tested on two different Windows 7 computers.
After updating the definition files, it will ask you if you want to run a Quick Scan. On both of those Windows 7 machines, the Quick Scan worked true to its name and completed in less than 10 minutes. Quick Scans are good tools if you're worried about major infections, but deep scans are recommended regularly to maintain a higher level of protection.
The Home landing page summarizes your security status, indicating whether your system has been scanned successfully, whether real-time protection is on, and if your virus and spyware definitions are up to date. A pane on the right contains scanning controls, and a pane at the bottom tells you when your next scheduled scan is. There's a link to the scheduler, as well.
Security Essentials' Full Scan took nearly an hour and a half to finish, but only used 4MB of RAM while running.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)The Full Scan took about 86 minutes, which is a bit long for a deep scan on fairly new, regularly-scanned computers. I didn't think that the program would turn up any risks, but somewhat notably Security Essentials didn't turn up any false positives, either. The Custom Scan lets users select specific folders or drives to scan, but it doesn't allow for customizing the type of scan used. For example, you're not going to be able to choose to scan only for rootkits or heuristics, as you can with other security programs.
The program installs a context-menu option for on-the-fly scanning in Windows Explorer, too.
What did impress me was the shockingly small memory footprint. During the most resource-intensive action you can take with the program, the full system scan, it worked itself up to using only 4.6MB of RAM. More often than not, it hung around a few bytes lower, at 3.9MB.
The Update tab tells you your definition file version numbers, when your last update was, and has an Update button so you can force an update check. The History tab shows only files detected as potentially harmful. You can sort files it's detected according to All Detected Items, Quarantined Items, or Allowed Items.
User can customize some, but not all, aspects of the program.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)The last tab, Settings, is where most of the customization features reside. A left sidebar list contains options for Scheduling your scans, adjusting Default actions, tweaking Real-time protection, Excluding files, folders, file types, and processes from scans, Advanced controls, and managing your Microsoft SpyNet enrollment.
Yeah, Microsoft actually called something "SpyNet."
SpyNet, apparently, is a telemetry system Microsoft uses to quality-control definition-file updates after they've been sent out. According to the Microsoft news release, SpyNet reports back on the efficacy of old definition file removal and the implementation of new definitions, as well as how detection rates on false positives.
Security Essentials users must participate in SpyNet. The default option, Basic, reports to Microsoft on where a potentially infected file came from, what your action was, what the recommended action was, and whether the action taken was successful.
Security Essentials' SpyNet malware reporting feature.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)The Advanced membership in SpyNet will send even more information to Microsoft, including the location on disk of your potential infection, how it has affected your computer, and how it operates. For both Basic and Advanced SpyNet membership, Microsoft warns that, "personal information might unintentionally be sent to Microsoft," but that the company "will not use this information to identify or you or contact you."
On the surface of it, this sounds like a standard security software reporting process on malware behavior, although I don't know how deep other programs go into your system behavior. However, it's definitely odd that Microsoft has chosen to call it out in this way.
It's hard to gauge any antivirus program without reliable data on its detection and removal rates. Microsoft Live's OneCare security program has a reputation for low false positives and strong "new" detection rates, but it's not clear how much of Security Essentials is built on or from OneCare. At this point, I'd advise users who are curious about Microsoft Security Essentials to try it out, but I wouldn't recommend it yet as a primary security solution without more field testing.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 






Will it block intrusions? No
Does it have a firewall? No
Does it have a rescue disk? No
Does it have support? No
Great idea - let's put our security in the hands of half a product with no support.
You can't really complain considering its still beta and its a free software.
XP, Vista and Win7 all have firewalls. Vista and Win7 have "Defender", a malware detector, built in to the OS. This is a free product that *actually* appears to function well without bogging down the system.
What is the issue here? Looks like a reasonable product.
"So will this product block infected or malicious web pages? No"
Neither will most free security products. That's up to you, the end user, to be smart enough not to go to those sites in the first place. You surf porn and you're going to get infected.
"Will it block intrusions? No"
Actually, it will. Download and install it to find out.
"Does it have a firewall? No"
Doesn't need one- there's one in the OS already.
"Does it have a rescue disk? No"
You don't need one. This isn't Norton or Symantec. This is much easier to work with. Just Windows Recovery will work and that's built into your OS. It has been for years.
"Does it have support? No"
It's a beta. Of course it doesn't have support. Why would you expect it to? That isn't being very realistic.
I would suggest you try the product before you dismiss it so out of hand. Then you would have an informed opinion instead of just making things up as they suit you.
For what it is, MSE, is a fine anti-virus. It can't be bashed simply because it's made by Microsoft.
Does it have a firewall? Yes, one is built into Windows now; Windows Firewall.
Does it have a rescue disk? No, it's not 2003, back up to an external HDD or use System Restore which has been there for years.
Does it have support? It's free...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD1WfImw97E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tzKvA1cVZk
Anyone else interested, be sure to use IE, as you need to use the MS Download Manager.
What's to lose if it's all free?
One word though - do not met two AV products co-exist - it is not recommended since the two products will butt-head and show false negatives.
MS has already released at least 2 different malware detection systems, for even down to Windows XP; Windows Defender and Live OneCare.
As to "SpyNet", where's the big news? I've seen it mentioned and got enrolled into with the installation of Windows Defender on WINDOWS XP, not Vista nor 7.
As to support/usage, which idiot does actually rely on beta software, especially software that has just been released?
Sure, go on and install it, help MS make it better. But don't expect anything "big" like more features, etc.
If I read MS right, this could be used as an in/pre-built solution into future versions of windows.
Now, don't talk to me about anti-trust crap, Linux comes with it's own anti-virus the same with it's browser. Up to date no operating system comes with so much stuff missing.
Messing with MS on this issue is simply unacceptable.
Kind regards,
Christian Sciberras
MS SpyNet has been around for YEARS -- as anyone has ever used Windows Defender should know -- yet the author is writing as if this is the first time he's seen SpyNet, like it's a new feature of Security Essentials.
Scary to think this author has reviewed many anti-virus type products yet apparently didn't even know what SpyNet is. Makes me seriously doubt the quality of his reviews in its entirety.
So will this product block infected or malicious web pages? No
Will it block intrusions? No
Does it have a firewall? No
Does it have a rescue disk? No
Does it have support? No
Now why would someone want to download this if it does not offer total Security even when free and in its beta version? This is absolute junk and so was Windows Defender!
Does it have a firewall - the os does already - yes
does it rescue disk - ythe os does already - yes
does it have support - it's a beta duh no.
It works with defender and it's a virus scan package. defender is a component of the overall solution. Why must people be such idiots?
2nd the program potentially to crash your system and get virus infected if u installed it
3rd products from microsoft example BitDefender Internet Security, all JUNK! except some are useful
4th since the crap is useless i think i'll continue using Kaspersky Internet Security (always reliable and
trusted)
um.......... your post all GREAT! except the content....
Defender has had SpyNet for years and I find it extremely useful because if I DO become infected, it pops up a notification and tells me exactly where, what the file is, what registry entries are and what the malware does to the computer, that means I can easily manually remove the malware. Windows Firewall is just as good as any other 3rd party crapware out there on the market...you just need to KNOW how to operate it since there IS Inbound/Outbound capabilities to enable if you KNOW where to look. I definietely trust Microsoft on security because, hey...let's be honest, who makes Windows? Microsoft, who knows the underlying layers of Windows more than anyone else? Microsoft, therefore I feel safe with them working on security issues. Even OneCare has detected and removed malware on my computer that NO other 3rd party AV/Firewall program could see or detect, that says a lot. For example, playing some songs on www.playlist.com would stop playing, but I'd just move along to another song, but OneCare AND Security Essentials (Morro) detected many many trojans embedded into the songs that would not play at all...hmmm.
Microsoft FTW. Let's see Apple contain any kind of security breach once their OS becomes "mainstream"...if EVER.
-Microsoft is being helpful to its customers
-FREE. Whats wrong with that
-effective
Microsoft has given its customers all the tools they need to prevent pc security related problems. the issue remains that most computer users in general are to stupid to use them correctly.
Apple, on the other hand, is playing a different approach. they are playing the "We don't have a problem so we don't need to take preventative measures" approach.
-Apple takes Months to release patches for Flaws in OS X, which there are MANY
-There are no security solutions available directly from apple
-very few 3rd party security programs
Apple likes to grind on So-called "PC" users categorizing them as boring, business types. all that really does is insult many potential customers.
Macs are PCs too- the only difference is the operating system.
I guarantee you, within 1 years' time from now, there will be a widespread attack on the Macintosh operating system.
Thank You for Your insight.
_______________________________________________________________
Microsoft = Win Crapple = Fail
I said that to say that I think in many ways Microsoft still gets a bad rap over their previous failures (Vista ready fiasco & early Vista driver issues). If Microsoft can debut an effective Virus product that works well with Defender & the built in Firewall to essential take away most major security worries without needing too much customer interaction they will have hit a major home run. Security software is now recommended by Apple for its own products. With Windows 7 looking promising and more streamlined than Vista a free anti-virus software to work seamlessly with the OS's other security features will go a long way to stopping the defections over to the fruit fans. I can't wait to use Windows 7 & MSE together this fall.
Thank you for your interest in joining the Microsoft® Security Essentials Beta. We are not accepting additional participants at this time. Please check back at later a date for possible additional availability.
@dlevinson15 I don't think you understand what a free AV is about. Unless you get all those other features seperately free from other software makers.
Just my 2 cents!
- by badcam30 June 24, 2009 8:35 AM PDT
- i like this software i just downloaded it. this is used for the other half of anti virus software
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (70 Comments)