Safari 4 fast, but only minor tweaks from beta
Updated, June 17: The sandboxing of plug-ins, such as Flash, in Safari 4 will be limited to users running Mac OS X 10.6, which will be available this fall. The feature is currently not available, nor will it be available to Windows users. Windows users should also note that changing the default search provider is limited to either Google or Yahoo.
The public version of Safari 4 was released Monday amid all the iPhone noise at WWDC, and Apple confirmed what those who played around with the beta version already knew: Safari is now a serious browser for serious Windows users, and its position on Macs has been bolstered.
You can download Safari 4 for Windows and Mac from CNET Download.com.
If you're unfamiliar with Safari 4, I strongly recommend checking out Stephen Shankland's analysis of the Safari beta version that was released in January. The biggest overall changes are the graphics improvements, including the new interface and the new JavaScript engine called Nitro, but since the beta little else is dramatically different.
Users of Safari 3 will be hard-pressed to not notice that the interface is completely new, with a look and feel much more in line with the other major Webkit-based browser, Google Chrome. The browser launches with the menu bar, tab bar, and status bar all hidden, presenting you with the location bar, bookmark bar, and the slick Top Sites interface. Top Sites is essentially Opera's Speed Dial feature, presenting your most commonly visited Web sites, with a Cover Flow-style skin. The black background, curvature, and reflective window bottom make this the most professional-looking Web browser around. A blue star and an upturned corner indicate that a site has been updated since your last visit to it. Tap the Edit button in the bottom left corner to remove a site or pin a site permanently to Top Sites.
One major change to the interface from the beta involves tabs. In the beta, Apple experimented with a Chrome-style "tabs-on-top" that it has abandoned in the public release. The font for the tabs was often hard to read, and made Safari look excessively like Chrome. The new tab style now looks much like the old tab style.
Safari's visual speed dial is one of the new browser's best features--if your system is new enough.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)Cover Flow is now available as a graphic way to browse your bookmarks and history, however, if you've got a somewhat older computer you still won't be able to use any of these graphics improvements.
Another new change for Mac users in Snow Leopard will be the sandboxing of browser crashes caused by plug-ins such as Flash and Shockwave. The page that they're on will continue to function, and you can reactivate the plug-in by reloading the page.
Safari 4 is also the first nonbeta browser to fully complete the Acid3 Web standards compliance test.
The URL bar does feature "smart" surfing, but only for including your history and bookmarks--much like Internet Explorer. Chrome and Firefox remain the only browsers to default to Google's "feeling lucky" style of searching from the location bar.
Cover Flow in Safari gives your Bookmarks and History a graphics lesson.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)Apple's big claim with Safari is that it's the fastest browser on the market, and Apple just might be right on that count. On an Intel Core Duo T400 ThinkPad, with 3GB of RAM and a 2.53GHz processor, I ran both Webkit's SunSpider JavaScript test and Mozilla's Dromaeo test on Firefox 3.5 Preview, Google Chrome 2, and Safari 4. Safari came out on top in Dromaeo by a long shot, but Chrome eked by in SunSpider.
For the SunSpider test, Chrome hit 597.0 milliseconds, while Safari scored 620.4 ms and Firefox comparatively chugged along at 952.2 ms. On Dromaeo, Safari reached 175.06 runs per second, Chrome managed 67.92 runs/s, and Firefox came in last again at 48.48 runs/s. However, Chrome only led in two categories, and it tied both with Safari. Safari definitively led in 36 tests, and Firefox led in 12.
Keeping in mind that although these tests are affected by background computer processes, your hardware, and other factors, Safari is definitely one of the fastest browsers out there. However, it still lacks extensions, and for many Firefox users that's enough to keep them from switching. Even Internet Explorer supports some form of extensibility with its Web Slices and Accelerators.
Like many other browsers, Safari's location bar offers suggested sites.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)Safari is still a RAM-devouring beast, too. With two tabs open, one to Dromaeo and one to SunSpider, it was using a shocking amount of RAM--more than 500MB after running both tests. Google Chrome consumed about 75MB of RAM across the same two sites under the same circumstances, while Firefox required 120MB.
With about 8.5 percent of the browser market, it's clear that Apple is positioning Safari as more than a developer's tool on Windows, and that its successes at building a faster JavaScript engine should be taken seriously even with its other drawbacks.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 

But I will give Apple credit for enhancing the browser.
Apple, quit trying to force people to use things you want them to use. I decide, NOT YOU!
To respond to some:
I am running Safari 4 on my iMac and Macbook and it runs fine on both.
I actually like it better than the previous version.
The bug reporting tool is actually much more useful.
The Top Sites feature is a must have. I use it all the time.
When Snow Leopard arrives, I will buy the family pack to install on both of my Macs.
Apple is doing a fine job. Much better than Microsoft could ever hope for.
Apple probably has around 15% market share (if not more), but 7% of Mac users are dual booting Windows.
Since I used Google anyway, this has never been a problem for me.
I *would* like to be able to specify google.co.uk instead of google.com, but that's not a big issue.
After today's line of BS with the iPhone, Snow Kitty, pitiful OS3 update. I really need a compass to say I'm as cool as Android.
Safari is used on iPhones, even Apple users hate it as a browser.
4.0 still doesn't work with my Lotus Notes web work email account.
It's as useless to me as upgrading my iPhone 3G to 3Gssssssssss for $499.00.
APPLE JUST LOST BY GREED! Snow Kitty is a bargain for $29.00 since it's Leapord with support for Windows Email. Apple at least got smart in that area. Imagine that, giving their email users (8%) email support for 89% of the market share.
Apple. FTL
Do you feel better for that ?
I've already heard fshea's answers. How accurate are they?
If this was Microsoft the EU would have a hay day and fine them another 100 billion.
Can you change the default search engine in Explorer? Seriously I don't know because there is no current version for OSX and I use Windows very rarely.
In what alternate universe?
I wonder if I should upgrade to Safari 4 now? Does Safari 4 need a machine with better RAM than mine?
What the author probably doesn't understand is that a lot of Mac OS X applications will use as much RAM as possible to get the job done, to avoid paging to the hard disc. When other applications or the Mac OS itself needs that RAM back, it'll get it. Don't listen to this blogger. Run Safari 4 final and enjoy.
(And did you see which browser was #3 in the i-Bench Javascript test? I thought so. And Opera v10 is even faster.)
It's still OK to try Opera 10 Beta...it won't bite, but it may impress the heck out of you. But whatever it is about CNET's childish editorial blackout and marginalization of Opera...that, I'm not impressed by. It's even unprofessional.
I'll stick with 3.1.1 on my Xp box !
it's the UI why did they change it to match the horrible windows luna theme
and it takes up too much ram on a already slow XP box !
3.1.1 is still much better as far as usability is concerned
but I've switched to chrome anyway
I upgraded and didn't do any more than restart the computer aftward. And everything is hunky dory.
AICAP, if you need a stable browser, don't download the beta. As far as Safari 4 goes, run software updates (to make sure you're actually running the newest version), reset your browser, and try again. It's been out less than a day and it sounds like the reviewer ran it through it's paces quite well. Remember this is what these people do for a living. They know what they're doing and I usually find their reviews objective and accurate.
You're putting a little too much faith and credence in what a blogger says. I found his "tests" to be severely lacking. Test it for yourself, then make a decision. The final release is a bit more stable than the beta (although I never had any trouble with the beta, just hated the tabs on top.)
"Uses too much RAM" - because we tell people to buy lots of RAM for rich web experience - but we complain when software companies use that memory for caching.
The interface is "completely new"? Funny, looks pretty much 95% the same. But hey - when you're used to Internet Exploder, I guess every browser looks the same.
I've been using Safari 4 for several hours now. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, since it seems faster, has the same controls, and renders better than IE or Firefox - and quicker - than any other browser on the market.
Bully much, Redmond?
--shelly
I got used to the tabs on the top. It is like driving a different vehicle with the headlight switch or something in a different location, you adapt.
Safari 4 w'd have been my favorite browser if it was released 10 years ago .
if you still use windows 95/98 , this browsr is for you :)
and thats what i said..
if you have windows 95/98 use it over IE6 , but on XP/Vista/7 it just looks like a stoned age software that was compiled in 1990s
"Safari looks polished compared to IE 6 and the original version of Firefox"
lol now thats the joke , if you said Opera 10 looks more polished than Firefox..that w'd be right, but safari ?? and if you dont like the original version of Firefox..you got over a million theme for firefox , but how many theme Safari got ??
My iMac - 3 years old - is still not snap quick like most Windows machines.
i prefer Jonnygthedrummer's way though
I especially find the Top Sites the most used feature.
User typed input will be delayed nearly one second when filling in a "Report bugs to Apple"
CPU usage will climb to 50...90%
Scrolling will be very jerky.
This problem has existed before with Safari.
- by ArsFragica June 9, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
- Safari 4 crashed too much, Opera 10 provides the same speed plus customization.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by kcotham June 9, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
- I've tried Opera many, many, many times over the years. I can't get used to the clunky UI. It's fast, I'll give it that. And it has an uncanny ability to render those "Internet Explorer only" web sites when nothing else will. But until they do something about the UI, it'll never get me using it full time. Maybe it's because it tries to do everything?
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (81 Comments)