• On BNET: Give your browser a panic button
June 3, 2009 6:42 PM PDT

Does Opera outperform iPhone's Safari browser?

by Jessica Dolcourt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 15 comments
Opera's 'browser' takes the clear lead. Unless you count Safari from the iPod Touch. (Credit: CNET/Screenshot by Jessica Dolcourt)

The problem with statistics is that it's too easy to jigger data down to numbers that prove in the end how quickly the exercise can resemble art as much as science. Take the latest stats regarding Opera's mobile performance, for instance. StatCounter's Tuesday graph showed proof of Opera's climb above the iPhone's Safari browser for the month of May.

Yet the claim that "Opera took 24.6 percent of the worldwide market compared to 22.3 percent for iPhone" is quickly followed by the admission that one only needs to calculate page views from the iPod Touch for mobile Safari to bypass Opera's lead. Web surfing from the Touch alone represents 14.9 percent of May's mobile browsing, according to StatCounter. Add it to iPhone's browser score and Safari's 37.2 percent overall market share quickly outpaces Opera's not-quite-25 percent.

The deeper you dive, the murkier it gets. What StatCounter didn't make clear in this report, and what is absolutely essential to gauging the popularity of one browser solution over another, is which Opera browser StatCounter counted. Was it Opera Mini, the build for Java phones? Or Opera Mobile, which works with Windows Mobile and Symbian platforms? Or was it both? If the final count indeed includes page views from all the browsers powered by Opera Software, then it could also cover white labeled browsing from a number of Archos personal media players and from the Nintendo DSI. If it doesn't, should it?

Even Opera isn't totally certain what StatCounter's methodology sucks in, though a spokesperson did tell CNET that the company puts a lot of faith into StatCounter's figures. A representative at StatCounter was not immediately available for comment.

Opera versus Safari, or iPhone versus everything else?

Opera O

You might also wonder if this statistical volley between Opera and Safari faithfully compares apples to apples, or if it is in effect one more measure that pits the iPhone and iPod Touch against other handsets. After all, iPhone accounts for 10 percent global smartphone market share while Symbian phones alone hold nearly 50 percent of the rest. By all logic, iPhone's Safari shouldn't come close to generating the greater-than-20 percent of the world's mobile traffic StatCounter says it has.

And yet, since Apple has shut out all browsing competition on the iPhone, I argue that the browser's seeming popularity is more a testament to the hardware's browsing-friendliness than it is to the browsing vehicle itself. In other words, it appears that more people browse more often on the iPhone than they do from other mobile phones. Would we see similar results were Nokia to lock out third-party browsers, too? Or perhaps Apple's minimalistic monopolistic limited approach to handsets and mobile browsers is one key to Safari's success. The irony, of course, is that Apple isn't ideologically selling its browser the way Opera is. It's selling devices, plus brand confidence and Apple's "cool factor" appeal.

So, does all this add up to a hollow numbers victory for Opera?

Not necessarily. Whether Opera or iPhone's Safari (plus iPod Touch) is truly in the lead, the mobile browser's (or browsers') numbers are up. Following StatCounter's stats, Opera's mobile browser almost fully recovered in May from a steady three percent decline since January to April 2009. In January, StatCounter called Opera out at 24.69 percent of the mobile browsing market, 0.05 percent higher than it is this month. However the usage numbers shake out this month, that turnaround, at least, is something Opera can unquestioningly be proud of.

Jessica Dolcourt reviews the latest and greatest smartphone apps, in addition to a healthy dose of Windows software. E-mail Jessica and follow her on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Tell the time and destroy the Death Star: iPhone Apps of the week
Windows Starter Kit refreshed for 2010
Big changes in Security Starter Kit 2010
Why to embrace Firefox 3.6's new-tab ethos
Sale: CoPilot Live GPS for iPhone, $19.99
Three apps we're thankful for
Mozilla issues near-final Thunderbird 3
eBay opens auction app for BlackBerry
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dkuntz2 June 3, 2009 7:14 PM PDT
does it matter? Opera is for desktop, iPhone safari is for a handheld.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 June 3, 2009 7:20 PM PDT
Opera has mobile browsers..
by 253916 June 4, 2009 3:33 AM PDT
which I'm finding much better btw.
by tipoo_ June 4, 2009 7:44 AM PDT
Opera excels on mobile, compared to their mobile marketshare their desktop marketshare is nothing.
by car4dave June 3, 2009 7:16 PM PDT
I do not think that statcounter is accurate. I do not think you can take their stats and say that one definitely did better than the other. I would want to say that the stats cannot be trusted and they are probably tied.
Reply to this comment
by rr11ccee June 3, 2009 7:18 PM PDT
thanks
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 June 3, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
What it really shows is the iPhone/iTouch sales have declined relative to the overall market over the last few months in anticipation of iPhone 3.0 on Friday.

I know many people who are waiting.

And once the Pre is released, the dominant/default browser on that platform will start to take a chunk out of others. We just don't know which phone sales will be most impacted by the Pre.
Reply to this comment
by retnep June 3, 2009 8:06 PM PDT
I have WinMobile and I use Opera Mini. I actually have both installed, Opera Mini and Opera Mobile. Opera Mini is by far the best browser I've used on a mobile device. Opera Mobile is too slow and clunky.
Reply to this comment
by bonesbautista June 3, 2009 9:06 PM PDT
I use an iPhone and a VZW Storm, the latter with Opera Mini installed - they're both awesome mobile browsers. The ability to render sites is top notch - even though the Opera version uses proxy servers, the ability to sync bookmarks with a desktop browser, and the bonus readability of sites on mobile devices makes both great products - I wish this stuff was around when I was a kid!

Numbers, schnumbers - keep up the great work!
Reply to this comment
by retnep June 3, 2009 9:45 PM PDT
BTW, Microsoft and Sun need to come to some sort of licensing agreement. Java should come pre-installed on all WinMobile devices. They are compatible and running Java on a WinMobile device makes WinMobile devices, imo, without a doubt the most powerful and useful devices on the market.
Reply to this comment
by simelane June 3, 2009 11:49 PM PDT
This is so stupid. How does one compare Opera to Safari. Surely the comparison should be between Opera and Webkit; which would then include Safari, Android (aka G1), Palm Pre, etc. hand sets.

Opera is used on dozens of handsets, none of which even come close to the iPhone in market share, while Safari is used on just the iPhone and iPod Touch.

If the intention is to compare handset market share, then Opera does not have a handset and cannot even be counted. If the intention is to compare mobile browser market share, then we should compare Opera with Webkit, Mozilla and any other mobile browsers out there.
Reply to this comment
by sbose64 June 4, 2009 10:10 AM PDT
i do not own a smartphone but is fully aware of their os and browser softwares. for my notebook i,m using a bevy of browsers,as many as 20 of them. cnet classifies opera as one of windows basics musthave,but i find opera,since last 4 years,no better than firefox or even chrome.i think its a bit overhyped. however,i just got opera 10 beta and immediately took a liking for it,impressed by its speed,particularly the turbo feature.opera mini is mobile standard,very good but overwhelmed by safari in iphone.i find boltbrowser and skyfire browser,both webware 100 award nominee,excellent though with a miniscule marketshare.overall in mobile segment safari is miles ahead,winning hands down,because of its parent apples runaway success iphone,now flooded with most apps. in history.
Reply to this comment
by renGek June 4, 2009 12:27 PM PDT
I use opera mobile on my pvp and its biggest advantage over iphone's safari is that Opera mobile 9 supports flash. About 30% of the sites I visit have flash content so thats a big advantage. My friend (who has an iphone) and I at one point both took out our gadgets to go to the us open website to look up some live scores. He couldn't because the site was flash heavy.

I think firefox mobile (based on what I have seen so far) is far superior to opera mobile so thats an even better alternative.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor June 4, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
You know, the exclusive Safari browser on the iPhone is one of the least complained about things on the iPhone, given that it's a great browser and anyone who uses it seems to be happy with it.

Also, iPhone users can only use Safari and no one but iPhone users can use Safari (on mobile devices). So this isn't even a battle or a competition since they can't even compete on the same devices.
Reply to this comment
by BigMG June 8, 2009 9:48 AM PDT
Don't know about you all, but I've stopped using Safari altogether. There is something that slows it down to a halt after a couple weeks of use. It's gotten to the point that if I must use it, I'll click it, go get a sandwich, watch tv, play a video game and come back in an hour.
Read the cache cleaning tips and such blogivating, but really don't care to spend a lot of hubcap polishing for just another browser.
Safari could be beat by anything under this scenario.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics