Speedy Opera 10 beta reconfigures as Web suite
Opera 10 has entered beta with the unstated goal of becoming more than a mere browser. Available for Windows, Mac, and Linux, the Norwegian program hopes to become a speedy utility--Turbo-charged, in their words--that handles browsing, e-mail, RSS, and torrents with robust features.
Improvements to Speed Dial give users more customization power than before.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)The most obvious changes in Opera 10 are the new default skin, created by British designer Jon Hicks, and a revamped Tab bar. The skin, Opera says, will continue to evolve before Opera 10 is finalized. Double-click or pull down on the bar below the tabs and above the location bar and you get thumbnail previews of each tab. The previews are resizable, so users who want to see only a small sliver of a tab to identify it visually don't have to worry about sacrificing screen real estate. The bar doesn't remember your last position for it when manually adjusted and then closed by double-clicking, but it does remember when you restart Opera.
One change Opera has yet to make is to rejigger the location bar to perform "smart searches." Whereas Firefox and Chrome have both forced their location bar search protocol to do this by default, Opera's still takes you to a search results page. This may not bother some users, but after spending the majority of the past few months on Firefox and Chrome, I found it mildly irritating.
Opera's revamped Tab Bar can show (or hide) tab previews.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)You'll have an easier time tweaking the look of Opera 10, with improvements to Speed Dial and toolbar customizations. Speed Dial has received a refresh. You can expand it to show as many as 25 Web sites and set a background image. You can also set it to never appear. Customization is easier, too. Right-click on any toolbar to reveal a Customize option. From there, you can hide a toolbar or a particular widget such as the search box, download and change skins on the fly, add or remove buttons, and add or adjust Panels. Opera has had the features in Panels, such as Notes, for a long time.
In this version, though, they round them all up behind one unified sidebar interface. Notes, Bookmarks, History, and Transfers are standard, as is a Widgets option from which you can download more panels. These widgets include things like a Facebook interface, a to-do list, and a Google services manager.
In addition to improvements to the browser, users can create panels to manage to their e-mail, newsfeeds, and chat, as well as select default clients to manage those services outside of Opera. The Opera default e-mail client, however, should be noted as the slickest of the baked-in browser e-mail clients. The e-mail folder tree smoothly integrates in a collapsible panel, while message composition opens in a new browser tab. Combined with Opera's MyOpera synchronization service, it provides users with a full-featured e-mail and browsing experience.
Opera's had e-mail integration for a while, but this is the most seamless it's been.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)Web developers will appreciate further improvements to Opera Dragonfly. In addition to the changes introduced in the alpha, developers can now edit the DOM and inspect HTTP headers from within the browser.
Opera 10 continues development of its Turbo mode, which uses proprietary compression technology to accelerate page loading. It's recommended for users in crowded Wi-Fi spots or on slow DSL lines or 56k modems, and users might even see slower page load times if they use it on a broadband connection, according to the company. According to their press release for this beta, Turbo "can offer broadband-like speeds on dial-up." If you have personal experience verifying this, please let me know in the comments below.
The Opera 10 beta 1 is definitely faster than its previous publicly available predecessor, the Opera 10 alpha, which in turn was dramatically faster than the most recent stable Opera, version 9.6. On a Windows XP desktop, with Service Pack 3, 2 GB of RAM, and a 2.8GHz processor, Opera 10 beta scored 5836.6 milliseconds on WebKit's SunSpider JavaScript test. The Opera 10 alpha hit 6068.7 ms on the same machine, while Opera 9.62 scored 7008.2 ms. This works out to be about 13 percent faster, although previous tests that I had done on a different computer found Opera 10 alpha to be three times faster than Opera 9.62.
Customizing toolbars is easier in Opera 10.
(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)Keeping in mind that the test only looks at JavaScript run times and that running the test on different computers can result in shockingly different results, we're still seeing performance improvements, although not as drastic as the jump from version 9 to version 10. Also, due to time constraints, I was unable to run Opera through tests on Mozilla's Dromaeo at the time the story was published. These will be updated later in the day on Wednesday.
Opera 10 remains the only browser to successfully complete all aspects of the test. While the new version of Chrome scores 100 out of 100 on the Acid3 standards compliance test, it fails the linktest. For users looking for the most complete feature experience, and one that's cross-platform and synchronizable out of the box, Opera 10 remains an excellent alternative browser.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 
Then, of course, it becomes Opera > Chrome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox/IE :-)
" assuming of course you have cleaned out the "bugs" introduced stealthily by Microshaft to make Firefox as vulnerable as its own IE.
Then, of course, it becomes Opera > Chrome >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox/IE :-) "
if u look around cnet u'd find that chrome has about 464 bugs.. if google doesnt fix or patch its browser it doesnt mean the browser is bug free .
Firefox keeps on patching whenever a bug is found ..that doesnt mean its less secure, they could simply ignore the bug and for so many ignorant people it'll mean the browser is secure since no bugs were found .
Yes, I'm sure Firefox patches as quickly as possible, as Opera also does. I was, however, referring to the article
Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability see http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1716
My apologies, I should have posted this in my original comment.
Speed? I don't have any hard data to back up my gut feelings, but it seems to be about the same as Firefox and Chrome. Better than IE? Don't know - won't allow IE on my computer!
Ummmmm .... Seth ... quite a while is quite a LONG while - like since Opera was first introduced unless I'm mistaken. It was called M2 then. And don't forget, if you don't like Opera's email client, then you can tell opera to open ANY email program of your choice.
Am I an Opera fanboy? Nope. Just someone who continually compares all the browsers out there for security, W3C standards conformity and richness of features, and keep coming back to Opera. Just go to Secunia and see how many outstanding vulnerabilities there are for the different browsers, and see that Opera virtually always has NONE, and if it does, then there is a fix usually within 24 hrs or a week at the most. Now THAT's security in my mind.
The primary reason popular plugins "just work" on the most common browsers is that they are specifically designed to do just that on those platforms because that's the way the plugin developers think and what they code for. There is no technical limitation here. If Opera had IE's marketshare, all those plugin compatibility issues would be reversed.
When it comes to website rendering, the same thing would happen, since we are stuck with all these braindead site developers who don't know Opera (or anything other than IE and maybe Firefox) exists, so instead they code sites to IE and Firefox idiosyncracies and proprietary extensions, rather than Opera's more accurate W3C standards-compliant way of rendering websites.
Don't believe me? Use the Opera "Validate" function (right click on the page) which sends the page's source code to W3C and see how many errors you get. For instance THIS page (as I write this comment) reports
"Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! 276 Errors, 120 warning(s) "
Now go to the Opera home page [www.opera.com] and you get
"This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Strict!"
Say no more. Yeah, I know - they would HAVE to have a perfectly written home page, wouldn't they?
25%??? I don't know what sites you visit. Can't be porn sites, as they are at the leading edge of technology and web standards. Any sites that don't render properly in Opera (I get maybe 1 a week) are sites that I wouldn't want to do business with, anyway. (ie I reckon poorly designed web sites = sloppy business practices.) The ONLY sites I have problems with are usually in the finance sector, who stil believe IE is the most secure browser around. Hah!
Probably explains the HUGE amount of internet banking fraud?
For example, my Credit Union uses externally created internet banking software written for, and I kid you not, IE5, Opera 7.x and Firefox 1.0. Sigh. Please see paragraph above about crappy programming - or maybe programmers.
That said, Opera 9.64 & 10 still work reasonably well (a few warning messages) on this site.
Plug-ins (I have IrfanView, Flash, Foxit PDF reader, etc, etc) all work fine in Opera 9.64 without any manual tweaking, and I have had no problems with 10a
Does YOUR browser of choice render the Acid3 test perfectly? [http://acid3.acidtests.org/] Acid2 test? [http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html]. Please read the caveat for BOTH these sites - your browser MUST be in the default (ie as in out-of-the-box) settings.
Opera10a does. My version of Opera 9.64 (which is highly customised with regard to page rendering (my choice)) gets to 87% for Acid3. I don't have IE8 but it reportedly fails Acid3 (I actually saw a forum entry about someone BOASTING that one of the beta versions of IE8 got to 42% on Acid3!!!). Maybe HE was on acid :-) Maybe IE8 has changed by now.
Lastly, there's more to a browser than gloss, speed and Firefox-type plug-ins (which can be security risks in themselves). Take the time to check the important stuff. Security, security, security then standards compatibility.
Again, this is the site's crappy programming. You are not doing anyone any favours by using the "Mask as IE" function - it simply means the site's browser reporting software tells the designer that "see - everyone is using IE"
BUT ... the sites code still sees your "masked as IE" browser as "other than IE" and so directs you to non-IE code. Hence your changing web viewing.
As for Chrome being the last yet still more compliant: Chrome uses Webkit, which powers Safari as well (among others). Besides, Apple and Google are both big companies with plenty of resources. What's more, many Opera issues I know are related to Google services (Mail, Docs.. etc.), so it's not a surprise, that they work well with Chrome...
I Like Opera because I easily to remove images, animation (GIF and Flash). Even some websites that we cannot copy with right mouse click, it does work in Opera.
When I enlarge the page, there is a menu 'fit to page' that I like so much.
When I copy the page, it does not copy the link unlike FF and IE. Sometimes I like this because I do not want to keep those links and have to remove manually, and in case I need those links I will copy it in FF or Chrome.
GBU all!
First of all, this article forgot to mention some new features, that may existed in other browsers, but not in Opera prior to 10. Like in line spell checking, that works pretty good, and on many language. Or the auto-update feature found in Firefox for a while.
As for the written part:
"Customization is easier, too. Right-click on any toolbar to reveal a Customize option."
Well, this part actually became more time consuming. In the old days you could simply drag'n'drop buttons. Now, you have to press Shift simultaneously. Prior to Opera 10, you could remove a button from UI, by simply right clicking on it and selecting Remove from toolbar... Now, you have right click, Customize, and then Remove from toolbar... It doesn't sound too much, but if you want to remove 10 buttons or so, you"ll definitely see the difference...
"In this version, though, they round them all up behind one unified sidebar interface."
Well, maybe I misunderstood these sentences, but this Panel thingy is in Opera for a long time (at least in Opera 5-6..)
"Combined with Opera's MyOpera synchronization service"
MyOpera sync has nothing to do with Opera Mail (yet).
"If you have personal experience verifying this, please let me know in the comments below."
Using some kind of bandwidth-limiter, you can experience it for yourself... :)
"Opera 10 remains the only browser to successfully complete all aspects of the test."
As far as I know, it's 100/100, pixel perfect, but not enough "smooth" to pass. Anyway, I don't really get these benchmarking needs. Is it fast on the sites I use? Yes or no? I don't really care, how much point Opera acquires if it is fast enough. Besides SunSpider was created for WebKit, and Dromaeo for Gecko.
http://download.cnet.com/8301-2007_4-10113913-12.html
In terms of resource use and speed
Opera, SR Iron ware > Firefox 3.x
In terms of security.
Firefox 3, Mozilla Minefield
In terms of extendabiltiy
I have no loyalty to browsers... I change as I see fit...
- by Poupy1979 June 3, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
- i love Opera a lot. However, 1 thing they MUST have is ADDons. i use firefox despite liking opera more coz it got loads of addons that i must use everday. The widget isnt that good or comparable to the firefox addons.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Freedomstarfox June 3, 2009 5:35 PM PDT
- Opera isn't going to get add-ons and extensions any day soon. They clearly state in their Help Center that they will not be opening up for extensions.
- Like this
-
- by jake3373 June 7, 2009 8:41 PM PDT
- Add-ons can really slow down a browser, especially on slower computers
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (73 Comments)SO PLS put in the next version ADDONS function and loads of ppl will not even think of changing browsers again.