Log toggling speeds up Cloud Antivirus
By pushing as much resource usage as possible into the clouds, Panda Security's new Cloud Antivirus aims to free up the RAM hogging that plagues many security programs. However, testing the new beta revealed slower-than-anticipated scan speeds when doing an on-demand full hard drive scan. Panda's got a solution that might help some users: turn off logging while running the scan.
Cloud Antivirus splits the usual scanning process into three separate processes. The OnAccess Scan detects executing threats, the OnPrefetch Scan detects non-executing threats that are likely to run in the future, and the OnBackground Scan checks all local files when the computer is idle. Because of the way that the scans utilize idle CPU time, the background scan could still be logging when you start an on-demand scan.
The solution is to deactivate the logging feature when you're running a heavy-duty, system-wide scan. This is risky if you forget to turn it back on after you're done, and highlights the lack of advanced options available through the interface. "It's something we're aware of and still fine-tuning," said Pedro Bustamante, senior research adviser at Panda Security, in an e-mail.
Deactivating the advanced logging works, although users shouldn't expect dramatic changes. Scan times increased from 45 percent completed in 30 minutes to 45 percent done in 25 minutes. To toggle the log, download the two Registry keys found at the top of this blog post. Double-click on LoggingOff.reg and reboot your computer to turn off the log, then when you're finished double-click on LoggingOn.reg and reboot to re-activate it. I strongly recommend reading the entire post, though. Bustamante has included a lot of information on how Cloud Antivirus works. The known problems blog post is also worth looking at.
If you do try this Registry tweak out, post your results in the comments below.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 
From then on, users get the free version and benefit from special conditions when they *buy* the full service.
:-(
Checkout in-depth review on speed and detection capabilities in Tech Herald: http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200918/3565/Review-Panda-Cloud-Antivirus
I?ve read that before writing my first post here, thanks.
Why you think the developer didn?t write "the version you now use will be free WITH cloud computing forever"? All he wrote was that there is a free version. Read his words. Like the FAQ say... "there will be a free version".. but the normal version will cost something. If Panda really would want to give users free anti virus with cloud computing forever, then they would write that in big letters on their main page,.. or after a user asked (in their blog) they would have added "MISTAKE.. SORRY... FREE CLOUD COMPUTING FOREVER..."...
Look at Trillian... users sign up for Trillian Astra.. download it.. use all the features like the never-working webcam thing etc. and then beta is over and users can decide if they want to contineu to use all features for $$$... or just some of the features but for free. In both cases, they don?t need to enter a new ID or even re-install/uninstall anything. They *continue with the software they downloaded*.
Sounds familiar? ;-)
It?s just good marketing blabla :-D
- by Master_Trusted_Reviewer May 3, 2009 8:32 PM PDT
- Hello Download.com Team,
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)I have to apologize for commenting here bringing about an "off-topic".
I would like to give a few tips to make your website an even better site, satisfying customer. I realise however, it will be more work for you and just plain yapping from my side.
I would like to know who wrote the review for Ghost Navigator 2.7.4 from your side. Here's a quick access to it: http://download.cnet.com/Ghost-Navigator/3000-2144_4-10656399.html :)
Improvements can be made in the following areas:
1) Please include the contact page for the reviewer, I had to re-route to Google for other cnet reviewers in order to contact them. So, please include reviewer's information.
2) I like his "personal-style" review but she/he lacks vital information, he did not provide me with her/his top recommended IP masker program although he mentioned to "check out some of the other IP maskers". This will save time instead of going through another search query all over again.
Other suggestion to improve cnet Download:
Please provide instant, seamless access to a "Contact Us" Page.
I love DOWNLOAD.com, just so you know... Thanks for all the great softwares, software reviews, Editorial Reviews and the having the best download community.
To a more better review times ahead.
Sincerest regards,
MTR