February 27, 2009 2:12 PM PST

Cover Flow won't show in Safari 4 sans DirectX

by Seth Rosenblatt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 38 comments

As those of you with older PCs may have noticed the hard way, some of the new features in Apple's Safari 4 beta for Windows require a graphics card with at least 64MB of on-board RAM that supports at least DirectX 9. This makes it the first browser I've heard of with an explicit graphics card requirement, but is this really a big deal?

Missing from next to the Bookmark icon is the toggle for Top Sites.

(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

DirectX 9 has been around since 2004, and you can pick up a card for your desktop that supports it for around 20 bucks. This isn't quite analogous to Windows requiring a massive hardware upgrade for Vista, although it is definitely annoying.

What is strange is that Cover Flow on iTunes will work on these older machines, including the main Windows XP computer I use at work. The graphics card is older, yet, as you can see in the screenshots, Cover Flow works in iTunes and doesn't in Safari 4. This leads to my other complaint about the beta: Safari offers no notification when your graphics card is not compliant. Top Sites and Cover Flow merely don't appear. So if the browser must require an upgrade, when iTunes doesn't, the least Apple could do is include some kind of warning.

Taken on the same Windows XP machine, Cover Flow in iTunes works fine.

(Credit: Screenshot by Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

This isn't the biggest deal in the world, and Safari 4 is still in beta so there's plenty of time to work out the kinks. But this strikes me as a seriously annoying problem, if nothing else, when you consider that the graphics and design elements of Apple software are one of their big attractions.

Apple suggests that one solution could be to upgrade your graphics card drivers, which didn't work for me. Apple had not returned my call requesting comment at the time of publication.

If you have other problems or solutions to problems in Safari 4 beta, tell me about them in the comments.

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
New Android phone? Start with these free apps
Introducing the Utilities Starter Kit
Using Facebook and Twitter safely
Three free iPhone apps that make shopping easier
The last deal before Christmas
Opera 10.5 pre-alpha goes Chrome hunting
'Driver' races out of history and onto iPhones
Yelp for Android now uploading photos
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)
by myles taylor February 27, 2009 2:24 PM PST
I chalk it up to being in beta and it's probably something they will work out in the final release. I doubt it's something that they would leave be. Just doesn't sound right.

Don't criticize the beta too much. This isn't Google and it probably will be out of Beta shortly.
Reply to this comment
by ti99_forever February 27, 2009 2:37 PM PST
Ha! What a great crack about Google, and too very true!
Reply to this comment
by opticrealm February 27, 2009 2:54 PM PST
I had the same problem on XP in Parallels. It is very annoying. There's nothing in preferences, and I even opened up Help and found nothing useful. The Safari4 web-site was also lacking any information. Good job figuring this one out.
Reply to this comment
by Ilgaz February 27, 2009 3:20 PM PST
On Mac Mini G4 1.42 with 32MB of ATI 9200, Cover Flow on bookmarks work.
HOWEVER, on that top 10 site animation trick,
Feb 28 01:16:08 mini [0x0-0x76076].com.apple.Safari[976]: CoreAnimation: 1360 by 2098 image is too large for GPU, ignoring

There is no conspiracy. It is either Windows OpenGL or the amount of GDI space Apple uses since it is only method Windows gives to them.
Reply to this comment
by Ilgaz February 27, 2009 3:26 PM PST
Also note that I am using a real GPU with 32MB. It is very different from integrated graphics (one of reasons I don't buy Intel Mini).
I highly doubt Apple will use DirectX. They must be using OpenGL and if OpenGL doesn't support it on Windows, it is your graphics cards vendor to blame not offering up to date OpenGL support.
Apple's programming style is never breaking the core experience trying to do show off tricks if the hardware is uncapable of doing it without load.
by ausernamenoonehaschosen February 27, 2009 4:29 PM PST
Same here llgaz. I don't know why it would require 64 MB on a Windows computer, but on my old 12" PB with 32 MB graphics RAM, the browser and coverflow work fine.
Reply to this comment
by sungin-real February 27, 2009 5:29 PM PST
maybe its still in beta i can say safari 4 are ot ready but its really faster
but i see it have some bugs the one i see is when you touch the history button and you click the web site
it apper it load low performance but i see that safari change the web browser history.
Reply to this comment
by nixermac February 27, 2009 10:38 PM PST
Oxymoron - "Apple had not returned my call requesting comment at the time of publication."

When does Apple return a call? They do not unless they would like to comment on something and it is not asked by the press. :)

Moreover the above statement seems to have lost its gloss because the press has used it once too often.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian March 2, 2009 11:13 AM PST
You noticed that - scratch that, you *thought* about that? I have for years considered that phrase ("[company] had not returned my call ...") to be something to throw in when the writer of the article needed another dozen or so words to pad the article with. It doesn't actually mean anything, does it?
by shellcodes_coder February 28, 2009 6:09 AM PST
Go get a decent graphics card rather than blaming Apple
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 March 3, 2009 10:24 AM PST
Should we say that to the vista haters?


Go get some ram and stop blaming microsoft
by DrtyDogg April 3, 2009 3:07 AM PDT
yes you should
by dadsgravy February 28, 2009 2:03 PM PST
Don't worry. There's a company called Microsoft. They're all about cheap people with old gear.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 March 3, 2009 10:24 AM PST
Was only a matter of time.

Kind of funny as well that hardware made for pc is newer then hardware for mac
by saffroncapital February 28, 2009 3:16 PM PST
For God's Sake... its a BETA.... its not complete... whine whine whine....

If your going to be that picky about it wait until the final version is released
Reply to this comment
by random truth February 28, 2009 4:57 PM PST
All this means is that they are now using the gpu for rendering 3d effects instead of the cpu in windows. I thought of this as proof that they finally got developers that can program using provided api's in windows. Most of the reason that itunes is so slow in windows is because it has the cpu render animations and 3d effects instead of the gpu.
Reply to this comment
by shetaan819 February 28, 2009 6:33 PM PST
Coverflow/TopSites for Safari 4 beta is not showing up with even video cards that do meet the requirements, for example, its not working with the Radeon 9000 series video cards which are above the minimum requirements. This is even with the latest DirectX version, latest Quicktime, etc. Cover flow works in iTunes just fine though...
Reply to this comment
by cnetdummies March 1, 2009 10:59 AM PST
My specs don't work:
Graphic Card: NVIDIA GeForce 3 - 64MB
Latest DirectX 9
Reply to this comment
by themd March 2, 2009 9:11 AM PST
I found my solution... Firefox
Reply to this comment
by Lol_Epic_Fail March 3, 2009 12:39 PM PST
Well said :) though recently firefox has been running slow on me...
by master_mind413 March 3, 2009 12:46 AM PST
me too lol
Reply to this comment
by handofblood March 3, 2009 3:13 AM PST
That's something you have to expect since it's beta software. Apple isn't expecting Safari 4 to be in mass use yet. They have it out so geeks like you and me can point out what's wrong with it. =P

Aside from the prettier graphics, Safari just reminds me of Chrome anyway.
Reply to this comment
by jordanaustino March 3, 2009 5:20 AM PST
Not the fastest browser, chrome is faster, and the graphics interface is a complete rip off.
Reply to this comment
by Maarek Stele March 3, 2009 6:09 AM PST
getting a computer w/ out a card is ludicrous. Video processing saves tons of CPU cycles and keeps you computer running faster when playing your Yahoo games. Those computers without them are work computers to prevent distractions or netbooks.

Most websites, even newer flash or silverlight sites require more video processing power, so if you're spending more for the memory and CPU, you might as well make sure there's an NVIDIA or ATI video card in that PC.
Reply to this comment
by andrescity March 3, 2009 7:28 AM PST
bookmarks doesn't work for me, always i tried to add one the program crashes
Reply to this comment
by quiksilver1804 March 3, 2009 8:45 AM PST
Macbook Pro running Leopard (10.5.6): Install won't run unless Security Update 2009-001 is installed (which requires a reboot). Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5600: Safari won't show Cover art in history and the Top Sites button doesn't appear either.
E6400 @ 3.2ghz / XFX 9800GT on Vista64: All features work. However, constant time outs on all websites. Many times websites won't load at all. IE8 and Firefox 3 on the other hand loads multiple sites/tabs as fast as I create new tabs. So much for world's fastest browser!
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (38 Comments)

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics