Opera 10 alpha: Compliant and faster--but not fastest
A correction was made to this story. See below for details.
Testing Opera 10 alpha confirms it can boast that it's the second browser in development that is fully compliant with the Acid3 benchmarks. It's also markedly faster than Opera 9.62 at processing JavaScript, but it's half as fast as the fastest Web browser currently available.
Opera 10 alpha is Acid3-standards compliant.
(Credit: CNET Networks)On both Windows and Mac OS, it was no surprise to see the Acid3 standards test come up 100 out of 100 since that was the big news from Opera Software earlier today. The browser is also three times faster than the current stable release, with the SunSpider Java test clocking in at 5,740.8 milliseconds. That compares very favorably to Opera 9.62, which I benchmarked at 15,468.8 ms, but is still slower than the Firefox 3.1 beta. Mozilla's latest developer build zips in at 2,787.6 ms when running its new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine.
The majority of the changes in this Opera alpha release are aimed at developers. The average user will rarely, if ever, come into contact with them. That doesn't mean they're not important, though, with further support for CSS3. These changes include sourcing fonts, transparency rendering, animation framerates, and two key evolutions in Opera Dragonfly. You can use the DOM inspector to determine the source of traffic, useful for Ajax debugging, and the ability to edit attributes in real-time.
There are three minor but important user-level changes. It's hard to believe that HTML support in Opera Mail was missing before now, but you'll now be able to see all those holiday e-cards within Opera. There's also a spell-checker rolled in for text fields, not just e-mail.
Opera 10 features an auto-install option for updates.
(Credit: CNET Networks)The last new feature, automatic program updates, could be potentially risky. Certainly in Firefox it would likely lead to the disabling of many extensions, although there's not much of a chance of that happening in Opera with its smaller developer community. The bigger concern is one of control: do you choose which version of a program you get to use, or does the publisher of the program? As annoying as Apple's update monitor and nag screen are, they don't force users to update; you can opt out.
It took a little hunting to find, but the default setting in Opera 10 seems to be the more standard notification behavior. If you'd like to tweak your update settings, go to Tools, Preferences, choose the Advanced tab on the right and then Security from the list of options. The Opera update drop-down menu allows you to change the default to "Don't check for updates" or "Automatic updates".
The big news of the standards compliance will only take Opera so far if other browsers match that mark. It'll be interesting to see, as Google Chrome introduces extensibility, whether Opera will go that route or if it'll try to maintain its niche market as a solid and fast out-of-the-box browser. However, Opera 10 was surprisingly stable during a half-day of testing for an alpha release, crashing not even once.
Correction: This story initially gave the wrong name of the Java test I ran. It is called SunSpider.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 

After about 10 hours on 10a, I am satisfied with the performance. It doesn't crash like IE8 and is not a memory hog like FF3. It has 'features' unlike the naked chrome and it is really fast.
I look forward to the release!
Of course it's hard, because it's not true... You can VIEW HTML mails in Opera for ages (although not always by default for security reasons), as you can expect that from a browser. The new thing is, that you can actually MAKE a rich text mail (also with pictures) if you like. Until now, you were only able to send plain text messages (or forward HTML ones).
Inline spell check is great, but it doesn't seem to work with other languages (it's buggy)...
I don't really get all these hassles with auto-update. It's now there, it's great, we'll see, if it actually works, so far nothing to upgrade to :).
"Certainly in Firefox it would likely lead to the disabling of many extensions, although there's not much of a chance of that happening in Opera with its smaller developer community."
Well, that's Firefox's problem, but Opera is NOT Firefox, as you may noticed. Everything is packed in and that ensures consistency. And this thing has nothing to do about the size of Opera community... If the latter would be twice as big as FF's, it still won't be the same. But Oper has some kind of extensions, that could be affected, like widgets, user JavaScripts, skins and so on. I think, I can live with that.
At one work place it is not far fetched for me to open 60+ tabs, and if i close one by mistake I can re-open it from the trash and it will have all my previous pages visited on that tab available AND still have my form data. Its a beautiful piece of work - I would even pay for this software (it is that efficient).
I have no use for much other web apps as Opera in this release listened to its users and has html in outgoing emails support. Oh and the new develope tools, built in, are now suprassing firebug imo. I cant imagine what the full release will hold in it - goodies of some sort I presume.
Opera suffers from a marketplace chicken/egg problem: they were committed to web standards for years before it became fashionable, but web designers today still stubbornly code to browser idiosyncracies instead of web standards. (Despite all the good work of the W3C and Tim Berners-Lee to convince them otherwise)
Most of the people who gripe about their abbreviated experience with Opera simply never spent a trivial amount of time learning about it's flexibility and power. For example, the vast majority of sites that don't work with Opera these days fail not because Opera is incapable of rendering the page, but because the site designer is using some stupid canned script that fails anything that doesn't report itself as IE or maybe 1 or 2 other alternatives. That's easily fixed in most cases by pressing "F12" and selecting another user-agent string - takes about 3 seconds. (another default capability that Firefox doesn't have without going deep into arcane config menus or installing another add-on)
Another thing: Why does nobody ever comment on start-up speed? On my older laptop, Firefox sometimes takes a full minute to start up! Opera, never more than 20. And by the way, in this test, CHROME always wins.....but it's not fast enough in actual usage for me to switch to it.
Finally, with Firefox, if I install all the extensions I need to get the same things I can get already installed in Opera, inevitably something will conflict with something else and make Firefox unstable. So for a perfect blend of speed and stability, Opera is, I believe, the world's best browser.
The ___fastest___ but very2 unstable 'n no support at all , what forrrr,,,,,,,,,,,
- by nirvan5a December 6, 2008 10:44 AM PST
- Opera is good but in my taste opera is kinda not yet food. Firefox is number 1 still. Addons and themes are big weapon firefox.
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by operaman777 December 20, 2008 5:04 PM PST
- . themes?? opera has numerous skins, and great number of ways to personalize it. and all of that "weapons" doesn't mean SLOWING DOWN your browser as adding add-ones does to FF. only some add-ones i find valuable most of them are trash.
-
-
(24 Comments)