Google reveals Chrome extensions plan
Google has published its plan to build into Chrome what is arguably its most requested feature: the ability to accept extensions that can customize how the open-source Web browser operates.
And guess what? Google's dependence on advertising notwithstanding, one of the extension examples the company points to is the ability to block advertisements.
The Chrome extensions document, spotlighted Saturday by Google programmer Aaron Boodman, doesn't include a timeline, but it does shed light on why the project is a priority for Chromium, the open-source project behind Chrome.
"Chromium can't be everything to all people," according to the document. "User-created extensions have been proposed to solve these problems: the addition of features that have specific or limited appeal; users coming from other browsers who are used to certain extensions that they can't live without; bundling partners who would like to add features to Chromium specific to their bundle."
When Google launched Chrome three months ago, it promised a Chrome extensions framework. Extensions are a popular feature of Chrome's most likely rival, Mozilla's Firefox, and one very popular extension is AdBlock Plus.
And AdBlock makes a specific appearance on the list of extension uses that Google said it would like to support eventually:
Bookmarking/navigation tools: Delicious Toolbar, StumbleUpon, Web-based history, new tab page clipboard accelerators.
Content enhancements: Skype extension (clickable phone numbers), RealPlayer extension (save video), Autolink (generic microformat data--addresses, phone numbers, etc.)
Content filtering: AdBlock, Flashblock, privacy control, parental control
Download helpers: video helpers, download accelerators, DownThemAll, FlashGot
Features: ForecastFox, FoxyTunes, Web Of Trust, GooglePreview, BugMeNot
Demand for extensions is real.
In an unscientific CNET News poll about why people don't use Chrome, about 19 percent pointed to the lack of an extensions feature. And on Google's issue tracking site for Chromium, a Chrome extensions feature is the top-requested item.
"Of all the Firefox plug-ins, this is the one essential one," said Firefox user Ole Eichhorn. "Chrome is faster until you factor in all the cruft that gets downloaded as ads, then it isn't faster anymore. When Chrome supports AdBlock, it will be the winner, but until it does, Firefox is the only choice."
In its document, Google described some of its goals for Chrome extensions. The extensions should silently update, just like Chrome does. They should be isolated for security reasons and only get access to resources it's entitled to use. Installation should be easy, taking only two clicks.
They should permit rich user interface options--rich enough to implement some parts of Chrome as extensions, Google said. Among the interface options should be "toolbars, sidebars, content scripts (for Greasemonkey-like functionality), and content filtering (for parental filters, malware filters, or AdBlock-like functionality)," Google said. Some interfaces will require the user to grant specific permissions, such as "access to the history database" or "access to mail.google.com," Google said.
Google will play a major role in extensions, providing a central service that can be used to issue updates and to blacklist "malicious or harmful extensions" so the browser won't use them.
"It's likely in the future we may want to provide a consumer front-end which would allow users to more easily find the most popular, highest quality and trustworthy extensions," Google also said.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 

Google: don't miss the boat on this one.
But this is what RoboForm has to says
Will RoboForm support the new Google Chrome Browser? When?
We are sorry, but RoboForm cannot integrate with Google Chrome.
Unfortunately, it is not possible due to the browser engine that Google chose, named WebKit.
We will look into possibility of integration.
Also, for me to even consider switching, they're gonna have to do something about being able to re-open inadvertently or prematurely closed tabs. I know it's part of the architecture that you can't directly re-open closed tabs, but there's got to be some kind of work-around other than re-browsing or rummaging in the History.
I don't think that will be happening.
Did I mention that being able to use Roboform is the only reason that I tried Chrome for half a day and then stopped!
Shoot, that's why I haven't downloaded Safari! Why even waste my time if I can't block annoying flash ads???
Did you know Apple spent over a BILLION in anti-microsoft ads ? And at the same time they poked fun at MSFT for spending a mere 300 million. Flashblock prevents any Apple-Crap-Ads from reaching my PC. The Syrian-Liar is a jack-ass. And I love making him waste money on ads that go unseen.
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2335242,00.asp
If they add similar features as FF and its faster than FF then you can say its competition. Supposedly FF 3.1 is supposed to even faster than the current version, so Google has a long ways to go. Also thought of personal info going from my computer to Google is reason enough for me not to switch from FF to Chrome.
It'll be a strange 2009 when further permeation of the Web 2.0 craze continues to push complexity and increase demands on the server infrastructure, but it is in the best hope that there are still those out there who in the interest of accessibility and fairness to make sure their goals are met with the bare minimal subset of these features to keep management reasonable and compatibility at top priority.
it saves your bookmarks online with ease, comes in real handy when u want to redo your system. it now even saves passwords..
- by dallas7 December 6, 2008 1:40 PM PST
- We wouldn't even be having this discussion if it weren't for the nature of the ads: with the "free this" and "free that" and "you will die without this" flashing, bouncing, spinning, pulsating and obnoxious audio. Type "nrumphlaxz" in shopping engines and get "buy nrumphlaxz at" frames and pop ups by the dozens from every Tom, Dick and Harry Web merchant on the planet. My recent experiences with Chrome and Safari confirm to me the noise is worse than ever - one of my favorite news sites having no less than nine totally intrusive ads and at least a dozen not quite as loud.
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (35 Comments)Having been a warrior in the battle against ad noise in my Web experience heralding back to pre-Lavasoft Ad-Aware days and maintaining hosts files ad nausea, the availability of Ad Block Plus in Firefox is mead from Asgard. I have become accustomed to "silent" browsing and I'm never going back. Or there needs to be a return to unobtrusive text and still graphic advertising. (OK. You can stop laughing now...)
Developers who ponder the public's cry for ad and flash (the app doesn't deserve capitalization) blocking need only to look to the harshest advertising motion on the Web site they're currently viewing.