New Firefox beta even faster than FF3
Mozilla fans can now play with the anticipated speedier JavaScript engine in the first beta for Firefox 3.1, as well as explore improvements to the Smart Location Bar and a slick interface for hotkey tab switching. Now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux users, the new JavaScript engine, called TraceMonkey, is not turned on by default.
The latest Firefox beta introduces a visual tab switcher and rolls in the Geode geolocator plug-in.
(Credit: CNET Networks)To activate it, type "about:config" into the Smart Bar, then type "javascript.options.jit.content" into the filter. Double-click on the preference listed to change the boolean setting from "false" to "true." Close the window and you should notice an immediate improvement to the JavaScript rendering speed.
Don't take my word for it, though. Using the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark test, Firefox 3.1 beta 1 completed the test in 2787.6 milliseconds--about twice as fast as the current stable release, Firefox 3.0.3, which clocked in at 5446.6 ms.
Using CTRL+Tab to jump between open tabs now has graphic overlay, much like the Windows Vista ALT+Tab program switcher. The Geode geolocator plug-in has been rolled into FF3.1. The Geode drop-down worked for me, but it wasn't always able to find my location.
You can now restrict searches in the Awesome Smart Bar using special characters such as "+" and "#". These and other aspects of the character restrictions are customizable through about:config.
Two much-anticipated features did not make it into this beta. Private Browsing, Mozilla's answer to Google Chrome's Incognito, and enhanced session management features were not available in this beta.
I found that several of my plug-ins were not compatible with the new tab switcher, so I just disabled all of them. Using a plug-in to force forward-compatibility in other plug-ins can lead to instability and crashes, arguably even more so because this is a beta. However, if you're interested in getting the fastest version of Firefox that we've seen to date, Firefox 3.1 beta 1 is going to deliver the goods.
You can read the full list of changes here.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter. 
www.browserasaplatform.com
The only drawback is that 80% of my add-ons don't work with it.
I also did the same test in google chrome, and it improved from 3.1beta(4800), to google chrome(4400), so google chrome if the fastest so far.
Chrome 2754ms
Firefox 3 4843ms
Firefox beta 3953ms
after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms
what does this option do exactly?
after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms
what does this option do exactly?
Personally, I've no real interest in running Javascript faster. I'm much more likely to block it.
If designers would write better code, be it Javascript, html, or whatever; I'm sure the performance boost would
be even better. Lazy web designers. They also need to stop running a lot of their junk client-side,
especially in the "web-apps" department.
Chrome = ~2200
Firefox 3.1 beta = ~2600
Firefox 3.0.3 = ~3100
IE 7 = ~29000
Ran each test twice. While Chrome and FF 3.1 are a little faster, I'm not seeing the leaps and bounds that some people are reporting...
Using a Lenovo T61, T7300 @ 2.0 Ghz, 2 GB DDR2 667.
Opera 9.6 = ~3800
FF 3.1 Beta: 1318.8ms
Chrome: 1518.0ms
FF 3.0.3: 2673.4ms
IE 7: 33884.8ms
We can see that the Beta version of FF is the fastest of the current Browsers, can anyone confirm my results .
Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms
Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms
IE 7: : 37817.0ms
If all of these browsers were each even faster than it's predecessor as the claims claim then double clicking on its icon should have no response to the naked eye because the browser had already opened, downloaded the page and closed again faster than the blink of an eye...
;)
Wasn't private browsing originally something that came with Safari and something that Chrome (and IE 8) copied? To give Google the credit is misleading.
i dont want to press the small "+" at the very right side, i want it right there next to home button.....
- by sims2k October 15, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
- Here are my results:
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms
Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms
IE 7: : 37817.0ms