• On CHOW: Can girls use the guys' bathroom?
October 14, 2008 5:00 PM PDT

New Firefox beta even faster than FF3

by Seth Rosenblatt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 37 comments

Mozilla fans can now play with the anticipated speedier JavaScript engine in the first beta for Firefox 3.1, as well as explore improvements to the Smart Location Bar and a slick interface for hotkey tab switching. Now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux users, the new JavaScript engine, called TraceMonkey, is not turned on by default.

The latest Firefox beta introduces a visual tab switcher and rolls in the Geode geolocator plug-in.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

To activate it, type "about:config" into the Smart Bar, then type "javascript.options.jit.content" into the filter. Double-click on the preference listed to change the boolean setting from "false" to "true." Close the window and you should notice an immediate improvement to the JavaScript rendering speed.

Don't take my word for it, though. Using the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark test, Firefox 3.1 beta 1 completed the test in 2787.6 milliseconds--about twice as fast as the current stable release, Firefox 3.0.3, which clocked in at 5446.6 ms.

Using CTRL+Tab to jump between open tabs now has graphic overlay, much like the Windows Vista ALT+Tab program switcher. The Geode geolocator plug-in has been rolled into FF3.1. The Geode drop-down worked for me, but it wasn't always able to find my location.

You can now restrict searches in the Awesome Smart Bar using special characters such as "+" and "#". These and other aspects of the character restrictions are customizable through about:config.

Two much-anticipated features did not make it into this beta. Private Browsing, Mozilla's answer to Google Chrome's Incognito, and enhanced session management features were not available in this beta.

I found that several of my plug-ins were not compatible with the new tab switcher, so I just disabled all of them. Using a plug-in to force forward-compatibility in other plug-ins can lead to instability and crashes, arguably even more so because this is a beta. However, if you're interested in getting the fastest version of Firefox that we've seen to date, Firefox 3.1 beta 1 is going to deliver the goods.

You can read the full list of changes here.

Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Log in with your face
See what's under McAfee's new interface
Tales2Go: Get on-demand audiobooks for children
Microsoft, Google split over browser bug bounty
Mozilla plans to drop Mac OS X 10.4 support
TweetDeck gets a few tweaks
Adobe promises faster Flash on Macs
Security software maker Vitamin D exits beta
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)
by RashidiB October 14, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
Seth, how does the speed of this new release compare to Google's Chrome? <br />www.browserasaplatform.com
Reply to this comment
by BlitzBoy1120 October 14, 2008 6:25 PM PDT
holy crap im using it right now, and is it fast!<br /><br />The only drawback is that 80% of my add-ons don't work with it.
Reply to this comment
by kylebuttermore October 15, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
same thing happened to me, its faster but there are too many bugs...
by Anysia October 16, 2008 6:01 PM PDT
Install Nightly Tester Tools. That will solve the problem of addons not working, with the exception of AIRoboForm. (that's the only one I have having problem with using)
by rhicrunner October 14, 2008 7:50 PM PDT
Seth, I dont know whats up with your Firefox 3.0.3, but I scored 2792.6 ms on the JavaScript benchmark test with 3.0.3 here..
Reply to this comment
by dbodizzle October 14, 2008 10:05 PM PDT
I did the same test from 3.0.3, to 3.1 beta. And the test showed a small improvement about 300ms, but nothing substantial like 5000 to 2700
Reply to this comment
by dbodizzle October 14, 2008 10:11 PM PDT
I did the same test from 3.0.3, to 3.1 beta. And the test showed a small improvement about 300ms, but nothing substantial like 5000 to 2700<br /><br />I also did the same test in google chrome, and it improved from 3.1beta(4800), to google chrome(4400), so google chrome if the fastest so far.
Reply to this comment
by goodspeed8701 October 15, 2008 12:58 AM PDT
Whatever i will stick to IE
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor October 16, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
Enjoy using what is known as the worst browser. :)
by evanxxxm October 15, 2008 1:12 AM PDT
IE 71975ms<br />Chrome 2754ms<br />Firefox 3 4843ms<br />Firefox beta 3953ms
Reply to this comment
by NickChaplin October 15, 2008 1:31 AM PDT
After enabling javascript.options.jit.content i got 2006.0ms in sunspider BUT<br /><br />after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms<br /><br />what does this option do exactly?
Reply to this comment
by NickChaplin October 15, 2008 1:33 AM PDT
After enabling javascript.options.jit.content i got 2006.0ms in sunspider BUT<br /><br />after enabling javascript.options.jit.chrome i was getting 1606.0ms<br /><br />what does this option do exactly?
Reply to this comment
by Doctor Entropy October 16, 2008 8:30 PM PDT
Switches the Javascript engine to the new one.<br /><br />Personally, I've no real interest in running Javascript faster. I'm much more likely to block it.<br />If designers would write better code, be it Javascript, html, or whatever; I'm sure the performance boost would<br />be even better. Lazy web designers. They also need to stop running a lot of their junk client-side,<br />especially in the "web-apps" department.
by ASaringer October 15, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
My results:<br /><br />Chrome = ~2200<br />Firefox 3.1 beta = ~2600<br />Firefox 3.0.3 = ~3100<br />IE 7 = ~29000<br /><br />Ran each test twice. While Chrome and FF 3.1 are a little faster, I'm not seeing the leaps and bounds that some people are reporting...<br /><br />Using a Lenovo T61, T7300 @ 2.0 Ghz, 2 GB DDR2 667.
Reply to this comment
by ASaringer October 15, 2008 8:09 AM PDT
I forgot to include Opera 9.6! My bad... :)<br /><br />Opera 9.6 = ~3800
Reply to this comment
by SoulHunterF October 15, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
Ive gotten different rsults were firefox beta was faster then chrome<br />FF 3.1 Beta: 1318.8ms<br />Chrome: 1518.0ms<br />FF 3.0.3: 2673.4ms<br />IE 7: 33884.8ms<br /><br />We can see that the Beta version of FF is the fastest of the current Browsers, can anyone confirm my results .
Reply to this comment
by sims2k October 15, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
Here are my results:<br />Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms<br />Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms <br />IE 7: : 37817.0ms
by imacpwr October 15, 2008 9:27 AM PDT
Define "even faster"..? <br />If all of these browsers were each even faster than it's predecessor as the claims claim then double clicking on its icon should have no response to the naked eye because the browser had already opened, downloaded the page and closed again faster than the blink of an eye...<br /><br />;)
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor October 15, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
There are too many variables to the browsing experience. Your computer has to power the browser so no matter how fast it is, if your computer is slow, it will render slowly. Then you have to take the speed of your internet into account. If your internet is slow, doesn't matter what browser you are using, browsing will be slow. A faster browser is only faster if your computer is fast and your internet connection is fast.
by myles taylor October 15, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
"Private Browsing, Mozilla's answer to Google Chrome's Incognito." <br /><br />Wasn't private browsing originally something that came with Safari and something that Chrome (and IE 8) copied? To give Google the credit is misleading.
Reply to this comment
by srosenblatt October 15, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
@myles taylor, i referenced incognito and not the safari innovation because although safari's had been around for years, and mozilla had made a decision not to implement the feature in FF3, it wasn't until chrome came along that we got the official announcement that Private Browsing would drop in FF3.1.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor October 16, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
I see the connection now. Thanks for clarifying. :)
by anmath2 October 15, 2008 2:23 PM PDT
Hey seth im havin sum problems with the 3d tabs. i did wot u asked be to do to enable tracemonkey by typin in about:config and then changing the bootlean from flase to tru, i restarted firefox and when i click ctrl-tab, its still 2d and just flips between pages, no 3d preview or aything, can u help me?
Reply to this comment
by coffee_shop October 15, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
anmath im having the same problem i dont have any 3d tabs
Reply to this comment
by The User October 15, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
What's the point of having Chrome, again?
Reply to this comment
by evanxxxm October 15, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
i have 3d tabs when i press Ctrl+tab, but where did the navigation bar "new tab" button go?<br />i dont want to press the small "+" at the very right side, i want it right there next to home button.....
Reply to this comment
by SoulHunterF October 16, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
go in view, toolbar and then customize, then just drag it in wear ever you want
by sims2k October 15, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
Here are my results:<br />Safari 4.0 for Windows: 2822.0ms<br />Firefox 3.03 : 4345.6ms <br />IE 7: : 37817.0ms
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics