• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
The Download Blog
advertisement
September 2, 2008 3:33 PM PDT

Google Chrome shines

by Robert Vamosi
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 29 comments

Google has released the beta version of a new browser, Chrome. In its comic-book pre-announcement, Google stated correctly that watching videos, chatting, and even playing Web-based games didn't exist when browsers were first invented. For the user, Google wants the browser to disappear and to focus on the applications and pages users are viewing, rather than on the border with its tools, and such. Google has rethought the Internet browser--some of its basic underpinnings are quite novel--but users will recognize some features as they exist in other, open-source browsers on the market today.

At the moment, only the Windows version of Chrome is available for download. Plans call for Mac OS X and Linux versions in the near future. That said, Google has released Chrome in 43 languages and in 122 countries.

Chrome is based on the open-source project Webkit, the same rendering engine used by Apple Safari. If a page renders in Safari, it will render in Chrome. Webkit is also the basis for Android, Google's mobile platform, so it seems that Google is planning to use Chrome in mobile environments.

For more details, see the Chrome First Take on CNET.

The interface in Chrome is very different from other browsers and takes a little getting used to. Instead of the traditional Netscape/IE-style toolbar across the top, Chrome uses tabs. Moreover, the tabs are detachable, so the terms "tabs" and "windows" become interchangeable within Chrome. Detached tabs can be dragged and dropped into the browser, and tabs can be rearranged at any time.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi / CNET)

Click here for full coverage of the Google Chrome launch.

As CNET's resident security expert, Robert Vamosi has been interviewed on the BBC, CNN, MSNBC, and other outlets to share his knowledge about the latest online threats and to offer advice on personal and corporate security. Listen to his podcast at securitybites.cnet.com or e-mail Robert with your questions and comments.
Recent posts from The Download Blog
Tell the time and destroy the Death Star: iPhone Apps of the week
Windows Starter Kit refreshed for 2010
Big changes in Security Starter Kit 2010
Why to embrace Firefox 3.6's new-tab ethos
Sale: CoPilot Live GPS for iPhone, $19.99
Three apps we're thankful for
Mozilla issues near-final Thunderbird 3
eBay opens auction app for BlackBerry
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (29 Comments)
by gerrrg September 2, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
Me like. Chrome is simple, not cluttered, uncomplicated and fast.
Reply to this comment
by onlyauser September 2, 2008 4:10 PM PDT
Fastest, best browsing experience so far. More features are needed though.

From the performance alone I cannot wait to switch form FF3. I can't believe I just typed that but I did!
Reply to this comment
by maceyr September 2, 2008 4:23 PM PDT
Now if they can allow extensions which MADE Firefox what it is (cough, cough, Adblocker, cough, cough), then it can really be great. I love how it doesn't EAT resources like Firefox, flock, etc does which totally shut down the browser minutes after running. But without the "extension" support, I'm not sure I can stick with it since those Flash ads are totally annoying.
Reply to this comment
by jjbraunius September 2, 2008 4:42 PM PDT
Can anyone say Opera????
Nothing all that different, just the fact that Google are using a prefabbed browser engine to throw some of their "magic" on top, with features that are existing in all the other browsers. Same thing as Camino on the Apple platform - rebranded FIrefox with a few nice extra features.
Reply to this comment
by sarah_oneill September 2, 2008 4:53 PM PDT
If three-quarters of people are using IE, no wonder so many people are so exciting. It's about time someone re-hauled the browser dinosaur. This interesting article talks about the effect on Windows and Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
by sigzero September 2, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
Blah for looks. All the current browsers can be made to look just a "simple".
Reply to this comment
by mholmes September 2, 2008 6:24 PM PDT
How much HD space does Google Chrome consume on C:? I'm getting low on that drive. Is there any way to install it on a different partition?

Thanks,
Mark
Reply to this comment
by fcs25 September 2, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
The bookmark program needs work.I don't like not having control over which bookmarks appear on the browsers tab bar.This is a major over sight on Googles part.
Reply to this comment
by tomj1969 September 2, 2008 7:47 PM PDT
It is easy to modify the bookmark toolbar...just drag the bookmarks to the toolbar....not sure why you would be having a problem...
by Mindgrinder September 2, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
its like copy of best of 3 worlds, its copied from IE, FF, and opera (the tab interface method is from opera) , i read it has multithreading i found its supports Javascript as good as IE as FF still has issues with it. Also it is basic browser it will be fast FF is slow due to extensions remove them and its quite fast. You can open and see multiple processes in developer tools and also in task manager i wonder if i open 30 odd tabs like FF and resume them on start up would Chrome be stable it will eat up my ram for each process like anything. Check Task Manager you will see Chrome.exe under process for each tab.
Reply to this comment
by Mindgrinder September 2, 2008 7:03 PM PDT
Also the auto suggest feature is faster that i agree.
Reply to this comment
by oludir September 2, 2008 7:25 PM PDT
I certainly do not trust Google.
Reply to this comment
by DarkHawke September 2, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
Mmmkay, I just made a liar out of myself on another talkback: Just downloaded and started Chrome. Gots to admit, the thing just flies! Unfortunately, I've already discovered three deal-breakers vis a vis supplanting Firefox. First, no Roboform support: I'm all in on that wonderful password manager and have no desire to use any single browser's manager. Second, no Adblock: I hope that will come eventually, being open-source and all, though I have my doubts that Google's only interest in this browser is faster web browsing and web apps.

Come to type about it, exactly how do you put add-ons on the thing? Or different themes? It's not immediately apparent, what with this quasi-IE7 look to it all. Then again I was surprised to note for all the hype about this thing, this "beta release" is version 0.2.149.27! In my humble, calling an app that's just a little north of version ZERO-POINT-TWO a beta release is a tad presumptuous. These things may come with future versions.

Anyhow, third: I miss my search box. Dunno 'bout y'all, but I've taken to that wonderful little thing quite lustily. It's changed my web shopping habits so much I don't remember quite how I did without it. It's more than a little addictive when all you have to do is put the search terms into the box, then just swap engines and hit enter to get all the varied results from Amazon, Price Grabber, Shopzilla, etc. I can't imagine how this "Omnibar" can match that.

And what's this I read on Vamosi's quick take that you CAN'T retrieve an accidentally closed tab? Yep, you sure can't! Maybe that's necessitated by the app's architecture, but I'm constantly popping tabs back open (lots easier than re-surfing). Bit of a strike there. But then how does it remember ALL the tabs you last had open when you re-start? Bit of a non-sequitur there as well. Ah, there's another one: just swapped the search box to OneLook.com to check the spelling of non-sequitur. Though it seems that a drag-'n-drop to the "Omnibar" works almost as well. Interesting that it has its own Task Manager. Replacement OS much, Google? ;)

Anyhow, more than a bit of a work in progress. If it does kick the other browsers into a higher gear, so much the better. And straight out, Firefox didn't close the deal with me till the 1.0 release, so I'll be fair and withhold final judgment (if there's such a thing with apps!) till then.
Reply to this comment
by DarkHawke September 3, 2008 3:03 AM PDT
One quick addendum: it'd be great if you could freely position controls on Chrome as with Firefox. Again, the latter browser has spoilt me, and I don't like what I consider to be a 'broken-up" set of controls. I do use the many buttons of my mouse for navigation more often than the browser buttons, but when I need/want to use them, I'd prefer it if it were up to me as to where they're located. And it's not just navigation; I have a button just for printing, placed just where I want it. A little thing, to be sure, but user-friendly niceties like this always are. As it stands, using Chrome's controls are as about irritating as the (happily few) times I have to use IE7.
by pslims September 2, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
I generally like the browser and especially the speed. But how do you change the font? When I go to some webpages, the words are a little blurry. I went to "option" and tried to change the fonts but they would not apply. Is it because this is just a beta?
Reply to this comment
by Kasserr September 3, 2008 3:57 AM PDT
If your using MS Windows then adjust your 'Clear Type' display setting that should do the trick
by mohdazhan September 2, 2008 10:42 PM PDT
This is what i'm waiting for... Hmmm Konqueror clones, fast browsing like a thunder, web page load as fast as eye blink.. simple and no clutter... 5 thumb up
Reply to this comment
by edwardr74 September 2, 2008 10:56 PM PDT
OMG! Chrome is one amazing browser! I just installed it and visited all of my favorite and most frequently visited sites. No problems! I cannot tell that it is a beta! And if the beta is this good than oh my god what do we have on the horizon!?? :) All I can say is BRAVO GOOGLE! One amazing job!
Reply to this comment
by stockyjoe September 2, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
Well its nice in regards to speed. Some sites do load very fast. On the other hand, I still find both FF and IE7 load other sites, especially tables based sites faster..(yes there are many table base sites out there OR CSS sites using tables for data)

Secondly, the interface is clean but in some ways a bit limited. I am a bit tired of the Google look (hospital white and arial/verdana). its needs some slight contrast in color before you are blinded by all the white.

Thirdly, although tabs are the "it" thing, many of us still use bookmarks and the bookmark tool and its placement are horrible. At least give me the option to move the bookmarks to the center or left. Having it on the far right is just stupid as all hell.

For a first run its not bad. Speed is pretty good but it definitely could use some improvment. Its nothing yet to pull me away from FF or even IE7
Reply to this comment
by jkaufman101 September 3, 2008 12:45 AM PDT
Yes, lots of improvements need to be made. One of the more egregious problems is the tendency for the browser to call up a mobile web page when a company's regular page is requested.
Reply to this comment
by kanstar September 3, 2008 2:34 AM PDT
Loyalties will be tested !!!

Perfect timing!

MS goes back to drawing board, IE 8 has requires rework, Firefox has time to fight it out on speed, consolidate on the addons.

As of now I have two default browers ;)

General websurfing = Chrome
Secured banking = Firefox

Surely Addons + Chrome ver xxx = unbeatable....

Good job Google
Reply to this comment
by Zipdude September 3, 2008 2:40 AM PDT
I tried to use Chrome to log in to my Google account.

It told me to login in using the login box, but there was no login box.

How broken is that?
Reply to this comment
by man-street September 3, 2008 3:51 AM PDT
from ware i can download it
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (29 Comments)

Search Download Blog posts

advertisement

About The Download Blog

Download.com editors cover the world of downloadable software and beyond.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Download Blog topics